Saline nasal irrigation for acute sinusitis (SNIFS II): a randomised controlled pilot trial with nested process evaluation.

IF 2 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
BJGP Open Pub Date : 2025-08-26 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0307
Roderick P Venekamp, Ben Ainsworth, Tammy Thomas, Beth Stuart, Joanna Slodkowska-Barabasz, Fiona Mowbray, Christopher C Butler, Nick Francis, Samantha Richards-Hall, Anthony Harnden, Alastair D Hay, Claire Hopkins, Michael Moore, Lucy Yardley, Theo Jm Verheij, Shihua Zhu, Paul Little
{"title":"Saline nasal irrigation for acute sinusitis (SNIFS II): a randomised controlled pilot trial with nested process evaluation.","authors":"Roderick P Venekamp, Ben Ainsworth, Tammy Thomas, Beth Stuart, Joanna Slodkowska-Barabasz, Fiona Mowbray, Christopher C Butler, Nick Francis, Samantha Richards-Hall, Anthony Harnden, Alastair D Hay, Claire Hopkins, Michael Moore, Lucy Yardley, Theo Jm Verheij, Shihua Zhu, Paul Little","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite having marginal beneficial effects, antibiotics are routinely prescribed in adults with acute sinusitis. Alternative interventions for this common condition are urgently needed.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the feasibility and acceptability of saline nasal irrigation for acute sinusitis.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>Randomised controlled pilot trial with nested process evaluation in 24 English general practices between October 2019 and May 2021.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants were randomised to advice to high-volume hypertonic saline nasal irrigation with a delayed antibiotic prescription or usual care. Feasibility outcomes included recruitment and follow-up rates, adherence, and acceptability of the intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of those invited, <i>n</i> = 81/107 (76%) consented and were randomised (42 intervention, 39 usual care). Two participants were excluded owing to ineligibility. Antibiotic prescribing strategies were recorded at baseline for <i>n</i> = 79/79 (100%), with no or delayed antibiotics prescribed in 60% (<i>n</i> = 24/40) of the saline group versus 38% (<i>n</i> = 15/39) of the usual care group. At follow-up, 80% (<i>n</i> = 63/79) of participants recorded whether they consumed antibiotics or not. Among those from the intervention group who returned a symptom diary, 96% (<i>n</i> = 22/23) and 65% (<i>n</i> = 15/23) reported using saline nasal irrigation during the first and second week, respectively. Semi-structured interviews with 16 participants revealed that most were positive about trial participation and viewed saline nasal irrigation as acceptable, noting it as an alternative to antibiotics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Saline nasal irrigation is deemed acceptable for adults with acute sinusitis and a trial of such intervention is feasible. A large trial is warranted to assess the effectiveness of this intervention for this common condition.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite having marginal beneficial effects, antibiotics are routinely prescribed in adults with acute sinusitis. Alternative interventions for this common condition are urgently needed.

Aim: To assess the feasibility and acceptability of saline nasal irrigation for acute sinusitis.

Design & setting: Randomised controlled pilot trial with nested process evaluation in 24 English general practices between October 2019 and May 2021.

Method: Participants were randomised to advice to high-volume hypertonic saline nasal irrigation with a delayed antibiotic prescription or usual care. Feasibility outcomes included recruitment and follow-up rates, adherence, and acceptability of the intervention.

Results: Of those invited, n = 81/107 (76%) consented and were randomised (42 intervention, 39 usual care). Two participants were excluded owing to ineligibility. Antibiotic prescribing strategies were recorded at baseline for n = 79/79 (100%), with no or delayed antibiotics prescribed in 60% (n = 24/40) of the saline group versus 38% (n = 15/39) of the usual care group. At follow-up, 80% (n = 63/79) of participants recorded whether they consumed antibiotics or not. Among those from the intervention group who returned a symptom diary, 96% (n = 22/23) and 65% (n = 15/23) reported using saline nasal irrigation during the first and second week, respectively. Semi-structured interviews with 16 participants revealed that most were positive about trial participation and viewed saline nasal irrigation as acceptable, noting it as an alternative to antibiotics.

Conclusion: Saline nasal irrigation is deemed acceptable for adults with acute sinusitis and a trial of such intervention is feasible. A large trial is warranted to assess the effectiveness of this intervention for this common condition.

盐水鼻冲洗治疗急性鼻窦炎(SNIFS II):一项随机对照试验,嵌套过程评估。
背景:尽管有边际的有益效果,抗生素是常规处方成人急性鼻窦炎。目前迫切需要针对这一常见疾病的替代干预措施。目的:探讨生理盐水鼻冲洗治疗急性鼻窦炎的可行性和可接受性。设计与设置:2019年10月至2021年5月期间,在24个英国全科实践中进行随机对照试验,并进行嵌套过程评估。方法:参与者被随机分组,建议大容量高渗盐水鼻腔冲洗,延迟抗生素处方或常规护理。可行性结果包括招募和随访率、依从性和干预的可接受性。结果:在受邀者中,81/107(76%)同意并随机分组(42例干预,39例常规治疗)。2名受试者因不合格而被排除。在基线时记录了79/79(100%)的抗生素处方策略,60%(24/40)的生理盐水组没有或延迟使用抗生素,而38%(15/39)的常规护理组。在随访中,80%(63/79)的参与者记录了他们是否使用抗生素。在返回症状日记的干预组中,96%(22/23)和65%(15/23)分别报告在第一周和第二周使用盐水鼻腔冲洗。对16名参与者进行的半结构化访谈显示,大多数人对参与试验持积极态度,并认为盐水鼻冲洗是可以接受的,并指出它可以替代抗生素。结论:生理盐水鼻冲洗治疗成人急性鼻窦炎是可接受的,该干预试验是可行的。有必要进行一项大型试验来评估这种干预对这种常见疾病的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信