Emergency Medical Services Utilization of Medication for Opioid Use Disorder: A Narrative Review of the Literature and Analysis of Prehospital Buprenorphine Protocols.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Kasha Bornstein, David Rayburn
{"title":"Emergency Medical Services Utilization of Medication for Opioid Use Disorder: A Narrative Review of the Literature and Analysis of Prehospital Buprenorphine Protocols.","authors":"Kasha Bornstein, David Rayburn","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2025.2486292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This narrative review examines the current literature and prehospital buprenorphine protocols, discusses the available outcomes data of existing protocols, identifies protocol variations, and highlights challenges and opportunities associated with prehospital medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) initiation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed was searched for articles from 1/1/2010 to 2/1/2025, using keywords \"Prehospital Buprenorphine,\" \"Emergency Medical Services Buprenorphine,\" \"EMS Medication for Opioid Use Disorder,\" and \"Prehospital MOUD.\" All EMS protocols from the website http://www.emsprotocols.org (Acid Remap, LLC) were reviewed, supplemented with internet searches. A data dictionary was developed to categorize protocol characteristics; categories of responses included minimum Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS) scores, initial and maximum buprenorphine dosages, adjunct medications for withdrawal symptoms, online medical control (OMC) consultation requirements, minimum age, contraindications and exclusion criteria, and post-induction follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six statewide prehospital MOUD protocols were identified, along with regional protocols in 21 states and Washington, DC. Details were available for 42 state or regional protocols. Initial dosing across all protocols ranged between 4-24mg. Maximum dosing ranged between 8-48mg. Median initial and total dosage was 16mg and 24mg, respectively. Adjunctive medication for withdrawal was available in 61.9% of protocols. Treatment with MOUD was limited to mobile integrated health/community paramedicine programs in 19% of protocols. Otherwise, administration was permitted via standing order in 52.4% and required physician authorization in 26.2% of protocols. The minimum COWS scores ranged between 5-8, with 71.5% of protocols requiring a COWS score >7. Most (59.5%) protocols specified 18 years as the minimum age, while 23.8% specified 16 years. Buprenorphine was contraindicated for pregnant patients in 38% of protocols, while 9.6% of protocols required OMC consultation. Ten peer-reviewed studies evaluating EMS MOUD protocols outcomes were identified, most of which reported successful initiation, linkage to care, and retention for significant proportions of patients evaluated for opioid overdose and/or opioid withdrawal symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prehospital MOUD protocol design varies significantly, and best practices remain unknown, particularly regarding protocol inclusion criteria, dosing regimens, adjunctive medications, and resources to ensure continuity. The available data suggest protocols with more permissive inclusion criteria and comprehensive service provision are associated with higher rates of linkage to care.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2025.2486292","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This narrative review examines the current literature and prehospital buprenorphine protocols, discusses the available outcomes data of existing protocols, identifies protocol variations, and highlights challenges and opportunities associated with prehospital medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) initiation.

Methods: PubMed was searched for articles from 1/1/2010 to 2/1/2025, using keywords "Prehospital Buprenorphine," "Emergency Medical Services Buprenorphine," "EMS Medication for Opioid Use Disorder," and "Prehospital MOUD." All EMS protocols from the website http://www.emsprotocols.org (Acid Remap, LLC) were reviewed, supplemented with internet searches. A data dictionary was developed to categorize protocol characteristics; categories of responses included minimum Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS) scores, initial and maximum buprenorphine dosages, adjunct medications for withdrawal symptoms, online medical control (OMC) consultation requirements, minimum age, contraindications and exclusion criteria, and post-induction follow-up.

Results: Six statewide prehospital MOUD protocols were identified, along with regional protocols in 21 states and Washington, DC. Details were available for 42 state or regional protocols. Initial dosing across all protocols ranged between 4-24mg. Maximum dosing ranged between 8-48mg. Median initial and total dosage was 16mg and 24mg, respectively. Adjunctive medication for withdrawal was available in 61.9% of protocols. Treatment with MOUD was limited to mobile integrated health/community paramedicine programs in 19% of protocols. Otherwise, administration was permitted via standing order in 52.4% and required physician authorization in 26.2% of protocols. The minimum COWS scores ranged between 5-8, with 71.5% of protocols requiring a COWS score >7. Most (59.5%) protocols specified 18 years as the minimum age, while 23.8% specified 16 years. Buprenorphine was contraindicated for pregnant patients in 38% of protocols, while 9.6% of protocols required OMC consultation. Ten peer-reviewed studies evaluating EMS MOUD protocols outcomes were identified, most of which reported successful initiation, linkage to care, and retention for significant proportions of patients evaluated for opioid overdose and/or opioid withdrawal symptoms.

Conclusions: Prehospital MOUD protocol design varies significantly, and best practices remain unknown, particularly regarding protocol inclusion criteria, dosing regimens, adjunctive medications, and resources to ensure continuity. The available data suggest protocols with more permissive inclusion criteria and comprehensive service provision are associated with higher rates of linkage to care.

急诊医疗服务对阿片类药物使用障碍的药物利用:文献综述及院前丁丙诺啡方案分析
目的:本文回顾了目前的文献和院前丁丙诺啡方案,讨论了现有方案的可用结果数据,确定了方案的变化,并强调了与阿片类药物使用障碍(mod)启动的院前用药相关的挑战和机遇。方法:检索2010年1月1日至2025年2月1日的PubMed论文,关键词为“院前丁丙诺啡”、“紧急医疗服务丁丙诺啡”、“阿片类药物使用障碍的EMS用药”和“院前mod”。审查了网站http://www.emsprotocols.org (Acid Remap, LLC)上的所有EMS协议,并辅以互联网搜索。开发了数据字典对协议特征进行分类;反应类别包括最低临床阿片戒断量表(COWS)评分、丁丙诺啡的初始和最大剂量、戒断症状的辅助药物、在线医疗控制(OMC)咨询要求、最低年龄、禁忌症和排除标准,以及诱导后随访。结果:确定了6个全州院前mod协议,以及21个州和华盛顿特区的区域协议。42个州或地区协议的细节可以获得。所有方案的初始剂量范围为4-24mg。最大剂量范围为8-48mg。初始和总中位剂量分别为16mg和24mg。61.9%的方案提供了戒断时的辅助药物。在19%的方案中,mod治疗仅限于移动综合卫生/社区辅助医疗方案。此外,52.4%的方案允许通过长期订单给药,26.2%的方案需要医生授权。最低奶牛评分在5-8分之间,71.5%的协议要求奶牛评分为bb70分。大多数(59.5%)协议将18岁定为最低年龄,23.8%的协议将16岁定为最低年龄。38%的方案中丁丙诺啡是孕妇的禁忌症,而9.6%的方案需要OMC咨询。确定了10项同行评议的评估EMS mod方案结果的研究,其中大多数报告成功启动,与护理联系,并保留了相当比例的评估为阿片类药物过量和/或阿片类药物戒断症状的患者。结论:院前modd方案设计差异很大,最佳实践仍然未知,特别是在方案纳入标准、给药方案、辅助药物和确保连续性的资源方面。现有数据表明,更宽松的纳入标准和全面的服务提供方案与更高的护理联系率相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prehospital Emergency Care
Prehospital Emergency Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
137
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信