Evaluation of neuropathic pain in lower extremity wounds using different assessment tools: A cross-sectional study.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pain Practice Pub Date : 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1111/papr.70029
Lubna Sabah, Finn Borgbjerg Moltke, Christine J Moffatt, Simon Francis Thomsen
{"title":"Evaluation of neuropathic pain in lower extremity wounds using different assessment tools: A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Lubna Sabah, Finn Borgbjerg Moltke, Christine J Moffatt, Simon Francis Thomsen","doi":"10.1111/papr.70029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with lower extremity wounds often experience neuropathic pain; however, there is no validated assessment tool to specifically measure wound-related neuropathic pain. The study aimed to assess the prevalence of neuropathic pain in lower extremity wounds using different assessment tools and to identify factors associated with neuropathic pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study of 130 patients with lower extremity wounds of different etiologies assessed neuropathic pain through clinical examinations, the Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 (SF-MPQ-2), and the Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questions (DN4). Pain intensity was measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 38 (29%) experienced neuropathic pain (DN4 score ≥ 4), and 75% (n = 97) described pain using one or more neuropathic pain descriptors on the SF-MPQ-2. The frequently reported descriptors on the neuropathic sub-scale were \"pain caused by light touch\" (59%) and \"tingling or pins and needles\" (49%). There was a positive correlation between DN4 and the neuropathic sub-scale of SF-MPQ-2, and the major difference between the tools is the design and time consumption. Univariate analysis revealed that younger age, arterial wound type, infection, and morphine consumption were associated with neuropathic pain (DN4 score ≥ 4). In multivariate analysis, arterial wound type increased the risk of neuropathic pain five-fold. Younger age and morphine consumption were also significantly associated with neuropathic pain, whereas infection was not.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Neuropathic wound pain is frequent, and the prevalence relies on the applied assessment tool. Arterial wound type, younger age, and morphine consumption are associated with neuropathic wound pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":19974,"journal":{"name":"Pain Practice","volume":"25 4","pages":"e70029"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11960041/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.70029","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with lower extremity wounds often experience neuropathic pain; however, there is no validated assessment tool to specifically measure wound-related neuropathic pain. The study aimed to assess the prevalence of neuropathic pain in lower extremity wounds using different assessment tools and to identify factors associated with neuropathic pain.

Methods: A cross-sectional study of 130 patients with lower extremity wounds of different etiologies assessed neuropathic pain through clinical examinations, the Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 (SF-MPQ-2), and the Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questions (DN4). Pain intensity was measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).

Results: In total, 38 (29%) experienced neuropathic pain (DN4 score ≥ 4), and 75% (n = 97) described pain using one or more neuropathic pain descriptors on the SF-MPQ-2. The frequently reported descriptors on the neuropathic sub-scale were "pain caused by light touch" (59%) and "tingling or pins and needles" (49%). There was a positive correlation between DN4 and the neuropathic sub-scale of SF-MPQ-2, and the major difference between the tools is the design and time consumption. Univariate analysis revealed that younger age, arterial wound type, infection, and morphine consumption were associated with neuropathic pain (DN4 score ≥ 4). In multivariate analysis, arterial wound type increased the risk of neuropathic pain five-fold. Younger age and morphine consumption were also significantly associated with neuropathic pain, whereas infection was not.

Conclusion: Neuropathic wound pain is frequent, and the prevalence relies on the applied assessment tool. Arterial wound type, younger age, and morphine consumption are associated with neuropathic wound pain.

使用不同评估工具评估下肢创伤神经性疼痛:一项横断面研究。
背景:下肢创伤患者常经历神经性疼痛;然而,目前还没有有效的评估工具来专门测量与伤口相关的神经性疼痛。本研究旨在使用不同的评估工具评估下肢创伤神经性疼痛的患病率,并确定与神经性疼痛相关的因素。方法:对130例不同病因的下肢创伤患者进行横断面研究,通过临床检查、简易McGill疼痛问卷-2 (SF-MPQ-2)和双重神经病理4题(DN4)评估神经性疼痛。采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)测量疼痛强度。结果:共有38人(29%)经历神经性疼痛(DN4评分≥4),75% (n = 97)在SF-MPQ-2上使用一种或多种神经性疼痛描述符来描述疼痛。在神经性亚量表上,经常报告的描述词是“轻触引起的疼痛”(59%)和“刺痛或针痛”(49%)。DN4与SF-MPQ-2的神经性分量表呈正相关,主要差异在于工具的设计和所用时间。单因素分析显示,年龄小、动脉伤口类型、感染和吗啡用量与神经性疼痛相关(DN4评分≥4)。在多变量分析中,动脉伤口类型使神经性疼痛的风险增加了5倍。年龄较小和吗啡用量也与神经性疼痛显著相关,而感染无关。结论:神经性创面疼痛是一种常见的创伤性疼痛,其发生率取决于所采用的评估工具。动脉伤口类型、年龄和吗啡用量与神经性伤口疼痛有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Practice
Pain Practice ANESTHESIOLOGY-CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.80%
发文量
92
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pain Practice, the official journal of the World Institute of Pain, publishes international multidisciplinary articles on pain and analgesia that provide its readership with up-to-date research, evaluation methods, and techniques for pain management. Special sections including the Consultant’s Corner, Images in Pain Practice, Case Studies from Mayo, Tutorials, and the Evidence-Based Medicine combine to give pain researchers, pain clinicians and pain fellows in training a systematic approach to continuing education in pain medicine. Prior to publication, all articles and reviews undergo peer review by at least two experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信