Effects of an extended MRI approval of an implantable spinal cord stimulation device on compliance with manufacturer's recommendations.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pain Practice Pub Date : 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1111/papr.70022
Marco Reining, Dirk Winkler, Klaus Kirchhof, Joachim Boettcher, Michael Kretzschmar
{"title":"Effects of an extended MRI approval of an implantable spinal cord stimulation device on compliance with manufacturer's recommendations.","authors":"Marco Reining, Dirk Winkler, Klaus Kirchhof, Joachim Boettcher, Michael Kretzschmar","doi":"10.1111/papr.70022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The current approval for all available spinal cord stimulation (SCS) devices set several limitations for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). As a result, most of the necessary examinations are not possible within the scope of the restrictive approvals and, if legally permitted, must be carried out off-label. This retrospective subgroup analysis investigates if the currently extended MRI approval of one specific device allows more MRI scans to be conducted within the manufacturer's recommendations.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Technical MRI data (saved in the DICOM headers) and medical treatment data for all MRI examinations on patients with Proclaim® implantable pulse generators (IPG; Proclaim® spinal cord stimulation systems, Abbott Laboratories, Plano, TX, USA) were examined. Due to a major change in our standard operating procedures for MRI scans in 2019, the two time periods (before and after 2019) were separately analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 62 MRI scans with the IPG. The entire implanted system was approved for MRI examinations in just over 50% of the cases, regardless of old and new approval. Options for lead placement were expanded in the new approval; however, this did not significantly improve the number of MR conditional devices. By contrast, for a higher specific absorption rate, significantly more scans within the recommendations are possible in Period 2 (p = 0.011). However, the number of possible scans did not reach statistical significance in Period 1 (p = 0.078). No device-related adverse events were noted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The new MRI approval is suitable for performing more scans within the manufacturer's specifications. Cervical leads remain problematic because longer leads are required, and the lower impedances inhibit the MRI mode.</p>","PeriodicalId":19974,"journal":{"name":"Pain Practice","volume":"25 4","pages":"e70022"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.70022","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The current approval for all available spinal cord stimulation (SCS) devices set several limitations for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). As a result, most of the necessary examinations are not possible within the scope of the restrictive approvals and, if legally permitted, must be carried out off-label. This retrospective subgroup analysis investigates if the currently extended MRI approval of one specific device allows more MRI scans to be conducted within the manufacturer's recommendations.

Materials and methods: Technical MRI data (saved in the DICOM headers) and medical treatment data for all MRI examinations on patients with Proclaim® implantable pulse generators (IPG; Proclaim® spinal cord stimulation systems, Abbott Laboratories, Plano, TX, USA) were examined. Due to a major change in our standard operating procedures for MRI scans in 2019, the two time periods (before and after 2019) were separately analyzed.

Results: We identified 62 MRI scans with the IPG. The entire implanted system was approved for MRI examinations in just over 50% of the cases, regardless of old and new approval. Options for lead placement were expanded in the new approval; however, this did not significantly improve the number of MR conditional devices. By contrast, for a higher specific absorption rate, significantly more scans within the recommendations are possible in Period 2 (p = 0.011). However, the number of possible scans did not reach statistical significance in Period 1 (p = 0.078). No device-related adverse events were noted.

Conclusion: The new MRI approval is suitable for performing more scans within the manufacturer's specifications. Cervical leads remain problematic because longer leads are required, and the lower impedances inhibit the MRI mode.

可植入脊髓刺激装置的延长MRI批准对依从制造商建议的影响。
目的:目前所有可用的脊髓刺激(SCS)设备的批准对磁共振成像(MRI)设置了几个限制。因此,大多数必要的检查不可能在限制性批准的范围内进行,如果法律允许,则必须在标签外进行。本回顾性亚组分析调查了当前延长的一种特定设备的MRI批准是否允许在制造商推荐的范围内进行更多的MRI扫描。材料和方法:使用declare®植入式脉冲发生器(IPG;宣告®脊髓刺激系统,雅培实验室,普莱诺,德克萨斯州,美国)进行了检查。由于2019年我们的核磁共振扫描标准操作程序发生了重大变化,因此我们分别分析了两个时间段(2019年前后)。结果:我们确定了62个MRI扫描与IPG。整个植入系统在超过50%的病例中被批准用于核磁共振检查,无论旧的还是新的批准。在新的批准中,铅芯放置的选择范围扩大了;然而,这并没有显著提高MR条件装置的数量。相比之下,对于更高的特定吸收率,在第2阶段可能进行更多的推荐扫描(p = 0.011)。然而,在第一阶段,可能的扫描次数没有达到统计学意义(p = 0.078)。未发现与器械相关的不良事件。结论:新的MRI批准适用于在制造商的规格范围内进行更多的扫描。颈椎导联仍然存在问题,因为需要更长的导联,而较低的阻抗抑制了MRI模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Practice
Pain Practice ANESTHESIOLOGY-CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.80%
发文量
92
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pain Practice, the official journal of the World Institute of Pain, publishes international multidisciplinary articles on pain and analgesia that provide its readership with up-to-date research, evaluation methods, and techniques for pain management. Special sections including the Consultant’s Corner, Images in Pain Practice, Case Studies from Mayo, Tutorials, and the Evidence-Based Medicine combine to give pain researchers, pain clinicians and pain fellows in training a systematic approach to continuing education in pain medicine. Prior to publication, all articles and reviews undergo peer review by at least two experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信