Modified percutaneous needle aponeurotomy for Dupuytren's disease: case series with functional outcome.

Q1 Medicine
Anil K Bhat, P K Navaneeth, G Mithun Pai
{"title":"Modified percutaneous needle aponeurotomy for Dupuytren's disease: case series with functional outcome.","authors":"Anil K Bhat, P K Navaneeth, G Mithun Pai","doi":"10.1007/s12306-025-00899-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Over the past three decades, percutaneous needle aponeurotomy (PNA) for Dupuytren's disease has become increasingly prevalent and offers numerous potential benefits. However, significant rates of recurrences are observed in literature. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of our technical modifications of percutaneous needle aponeurotomy that significantly separates the cord in the palm and digits, thereby minimizing recurrences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We treated 23 consecutive patients with our modified technique. We use a larger-bore needle in the dorsovolar direction which involves a more controlled extensive disruption of the cord under local anesthesia. The mean total passive extension deficit (TPED) and the Dupuytren's contracture-specific Unité rhumatologique desaffections de la main (URAM) scores were calculated at final follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three patients underwent the procedure, involving 28 affected hands and 38 fingers, including 22 ring fingers, 6 little fingers, and 10 middle fingers. The average follow-up period was 22 months, ranging from 12 to 28 months. At presentation, the mean total passive extension deficit TPED was 50°. At the time of the final follow-up, the mean (TPED) was 10°, with a mean percent correction of 83% which was found to be statistically significant. This included 82% correction at the metacarpophalangeal joint and 81% at the proximal interphalangeal joint. Only four experienced recurrences, accounting for 14.2% of the total with a mean TPED of 30°. Lower URAM score indicated a significant short-term functional improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our modified PNA technique enhances cord division in the palm and fingers, leading to improved contracture correction and lower recurrence rates. However, further studies with larger cohorts and control groups are needed to validate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":18875,"journal":{"name":"MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-025-00899-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Over the past three decades, percutaneous needle aponeurotomy (PNA) for Dupuytren's disease has become increasingly prevalent and offers numerous potential benefits. However, significant rates of recurrences are observed in literature. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of our technical modifications of percutaneous needle aponeurotomy that significantly separates the cord in the palm and digits, thereby minimizing recurrences.

Methods: We treated 23 consecutive patients with our modified technique. We use a larger-bore needle in the dorsovolar direction which involves a more controlled extensive disruption of the cord under local anesthesia. The mean total passive extension deficit (TPED) and the Dupuytren's contracture-specific Unité rhumatologique desaffections de la main (URAM) scores were calculated at final follow-up.

Results: Twenty-three patients underwent the procedure, involving 28 affected hands and 38 fingers, including 22 ring fingers, 6 little fingers, and 10 middle fingers. The average follow-up period was 22 months, ranging from 12 to 28 months. At presentation, the mean total passive extension deficit TPED was 50°. At the time of the final follow-up, the mean (TPED) was 10°, with a mean percent correction of 83% which was found to be statistically significant. This included 82% correction at the metacarpophalangeal joint and 81% at the proximal interphalangeal joint. Only four experienced recurrences, accounting for 14.2% of the total with a mean TPED of 30°. Lower URAM score indicated a significant short-term functional improvement.

Conclusion: Our modified PNA technique enhances cord division in the palm and fingers, leading to improved contracture correction and lower recurrence rates. However, further studies with larger cohorts and control groups are needed to validate these findings.

改良经皮针刺腱神经切开术治疗Dupuytren病:具有功能结局的病例系列。
目的:在过去的三十年中,经皮针刺腱神经切开术(PNA)治疗Dupuytren病越来越普遍,并提供了许多潜在的益处。然而,在文献中观察到显著的复发率。我们的目的是评估经皮针刺腱神经切开术的技术改进的有效性,该技术显著地分离了手掌和手指的脊髓,从而减少了复发。方法:对23例患者进行改良手术治疗。在局部麻醉下,我们在背掌方向使用更大口径的针,这涉及到更可控的广泛脊髓断裂。在最后随访时计算平均总被动伸展缺陷(TPED)和Dupuytren's挛缩特异性单一风湿病衰竭(URAM)评分。结果:23例患者完成手术,涉及28只患手,38个手指,其中22只无名指,6只小指,10只中指。平均随访22个月,12 ~ 28个月不等。在就诊时,平均总被动延伸缺损TPED为50°。在最后一次随访时,平均(TPED)为10°,平均百分比校正率为83%,具有统计学意义。其中掌指关节矫正82%,近端指间关节矫正81%。只有4例复发,占总数的14.2%,平均TPED为30°。较低的URAM评分表明短期功能显著改善。结论:我们改良的PNA技术增强了手掌和手指的脐带分裂,从而改善了挛缩的矫正,降低了复发率。然而,需要对更大的队列和对照组进行进一步的研究来验证这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY
MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Musculoskeletal Surgery – Formerly La Chirurgia degli Organi di Movimento, founded in 1917 at the Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, is a peer-reviewed journal published three times a year. The journal provides up-to-date information to clinicians and scientists through the publication of original papers, reviews, case reports, and brief communications dealing with the pathogenesis and treatment of orthopaedic conditions.An electronic version is also available at http://www.springerlink.com.The journal is open for publication of supplements and for publishing abstracts of scientific meetings; conditions can be obtained from the Editors-in-Chief or the Publisher.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信