Dainis Krievins, Sanda Jegere, Gustavs Latkovskis, Aigars Lacis, Edgars Zellans, Indulis Kumsars, Davis Putrins, Janis Vetra, Edgars Supols, Ligita Zvaigzne, Arnis Kirsners, Andrejs Erglis, Patricija Ivanova, Janis Jurkans, Christopher K Zarins
{"title":"Ischemia targeted coronary revascularization improves five-year survival following carotid endarterectomy.","authors":"Dainis Krievins, Sanda Jegere, Gustavs Latkovskis, Aigars Lacis, Edgars Zellans, Indulis Kumsars, Davis Putrins, Janis Vetra, Edgars Supols, Ligita Zvaigzne, Arnis Kirsners, Andrejs Erglis, Patricija Ivanova, Janis Jurkans, Christopher K Zarins","doi":"10.1016/j.jvs.2025.03.197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Long-term survival following carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is limited by adverse cardiac events with 5% annual mortality. We sought to determine whether diagnosis of silent coronary ischemia together with elective ischemia-targeted coronary revascularization can reduce death and myocardial infarction (MI) and improve long-term survival of patients following CEA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Observational cohort study of patients with no cardiac history or coronary symptoms undergoing elective CEA. Patients enrolled in a prospective study of pre-operative cardiac evaluation using coronary CT-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR<sub>CT</sub>) to detect silent (asymptomatic) coronary ischemia together with elective post-operative ischemia-targeted coronary revascularization were compared to matched Controls with standard pre-operative cardiac evaluation and no elective coronary revascularization. Lesion-specific coronary ischemia was defined as FFR<sub>CT</sub> ≤0.80 distal to >30% stenosis with severe ischemia defined as FFR<sub>CT</sub> ≤0.75. Endpoints included all-cause death, cardiac death, MI, stroke and MACE (major adverse cardiovascular events = cardiovascular (CV) death, MI or stroke) during 5-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>FFR<sub>CT</sub> (n=100) and Control (N=100) cohorts were well matched with no significant differences in age, gender, comorbidities or indications for CEA. Asymptomatic lesion-specific coronary ischemia (FFR<sub>CT</sub> ≤0.80) was present in 57% of FFR<sub>CT</sub> patients, with severe ischemia in 44%, and left main ischemia in 7%; 43% had no coronary ischemia (FFR<sub>CT</sub> >0.80). The status of coronary ischemia was unknown in Controls. CEA was performed successfully in both cohorts with no deaths or neurologic events and all patients received optimal post-operative medical therapy. Elective ischemia-targeted coronary revascularization was performed in 33% of FFR<sub>CT</sub> patients within 3 months of CEA. Controls had no elective coronary revascularization. During 5-year follow up, compared to Control, the FFR<sub>CT</sub> group had fewer all-cause deaths (11% vs 24%, hazard ratio [HR] 0.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.17-0.77, P=.016); fewer cardiac deaths (3% vs 13%, HR 0.15, 95% CI 0.03-0.69, P=.009); fewer MIs (3% vs 21%, HR 0.07, 95% CI 0.02-0.31, P<.001) and fewer MACE events (10% vs 33%, HR 0.21, 95% CI 0.10-0.44, P<.001) with no difference in stroke. There were no cardiac deaths or MIs among patients with no coronary ischemia (FFR<sub>CT</sub> >0.80). Annual mortality in FFR<sub>CT</sub> was 2.2% per year compared to 4.8% per year in Control.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Diagnosis of silent coronary ischemia together with elective ischemia-targeted coronary revascularization following CEA reduced the 5-year risk of all-cause death, cardiac death, MI and MACE by more than 50% and improved survival (89%) compared to patients receiving standard cardiac evaluation and care (76%).</p>","PeriodicalId":17475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2025.03.197","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Long-term survival following carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is limited by adverse cardiac events with 5% annual mortality. We sought to determine whether diagnosis of silent coronary ischemia together with elective ischemia-targeted coronary revascularization can reduce death and myocardial infarction (MI) and improve long-term survival of patients following CEA.
Methods: Observational cohort study of patients with no cardiac history or coronary symptoms undergoing elective CEA. Patients enrolled in a prospective study of pre-operative cardiac evaluation using coronary CT-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) to detect silent (asymptomatic) coronary ischemia together with elective post-operative ischemia-targeted coronary revascularization were compared to matched Controls with standard pre-operative cardiac evaluation and no elective coronary revascularization. Lesion-specific coronary ischemia was defined as FFRCT ≤0.80 distal to >30% stenosis with severe ischemia defined as FFRCT ≤0.75. Endpoints included all-cause death, cardiac death, MI, stroke and MACE (major adverse cardiovascular events = cardiovascular (CV) death, MI or stroke) during 5-year follow-up.
Results: FFRCT (n=100) and Control (N=100) cohorts were well matched with no significant differences in age, gender, comorbidities or indications for CEA. Asymptomatic lesion-specific coronary ischemia (FFRCT ≤0.80) was present in 57% of FFRCT patients, with severe ischemia in 44%, and left main ischemia in 7%; 43% had no coronary ischemia (FFRCT >0.80). The status of coronary ischemia was unknown in Controls. CEA was performed successfully in both cohorts with no deaths or neurologic events and all patients received optimal post-operative medical therapy. Elective ischemia-targeted coronary revascularization was performed in 33% of FFRCT patients within 3 months of CEA. Controls had no elective coronary revascularization. During 5-year follow up, compared to Control, the FFRCT group had fewer all-cause deaths (11% vs 24%, hazard ratio [HR] 0.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.17-0.77, P=.016); fewer cardiac deaths (3% vs 13%, HR 0.15, 95% CI 0.03-0.69, P=.009); fewer MIs (3% vs 21%, HR 0.07, 95% CI 0.02-0.31, P<.001) and fewer MACE events (10% vs 33%, HR 0.21, 95% CI 0.10-0.44, P<.001) with no difference in stroke. There were no cardiac deaths or MIs among patients with no coronary ischemia (FFRCT >0.80). Annual mortality in FFRCT was 2.2% per year compared to 4.8% per year in Control.
Conclusions: Diagnosis of silent coronary ischemia together with elective ischemia-targeted coronary revascularization following CEA reduced the 5-year risk of all-cause death, cardiac death, MI and MACE by more than 50% and improved survival (89%) compared to patients receiving standard cardiac evaluation and care (76%).
目的:颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)后的长期存活率受到不良心脏事件的限制,年死亡率为 5%。我们试图确定无声冠状动脉缺血的诊断和选择性缺血靶向冠状动脉血运重建是否能减少CEA术后患者的死亡和心肌梗死(MI),并提高其长期生存率:对无心脏病史或冠状动脉症状的择期接受 CEA 的患者进行观察性队列研究。参加一项前瞻性研究的患者在术前进行了心脏评估,使用冠状动脉 CT 导出的分数血流储备(FFRCT)检测无声(无症状)冠状动脉缺血,并在术后进行了选择性缺血靶向冠状动脉血运重建,与接受标准术前心脏评估且未进行选择性冠状动脉血运重建的匹配对照组进行了比较。病变特异性冠状动脉缺血定义为 FFRCT ≤0.80,远端 >30% 狭窄,严重缺血定义为 FFRCT ≤0.75。终点包括随访5年期间的全因死亡、心源性死亡、心肌梗死、中风和MACE(主要不良心血管事件=心血管(CV)死亡、心肌梗死或中风):结果:FFRCT(100 人)和对照组(100 人)在年龄、性别、合并症或 CEA 适应症方面无明显差异,匹配度很高。57%的FFRCT患者存在无症状病变特异性冠状动脉缺血(FFRCT≤0.80),44%为重度缺血,7%为左主干缺血;43%无冠状动脉缺血(FFRCT>0.80)。对照组的冠状动脉缺血状况不明。两组患者均成功实施了 CEA,无死亡或神经系统事件,所有患者均接受了最佳的术后药物治疗。33% 的 FFRCT 患者在 CEA 术后 3 个月内进行了选择性缺血靶向冠状动脉血运重建。对照组没有进行选择性冠状动脉血运重建。在5年随访期间,与对照组相比,FFRCT组的全因死亡人数较少(11% vs 24%,危险比[HR] 0.37,95% 置信区间[CI] 0.17-0.77,P=.016);心源性死亡人数较少(3% vs 13%,HR 0.15,95% CI 0.03-0.69,P=.009);心肌梗死人数较少(3% vs 21%,HR 0.07,95% CI 0.02-0.31,PCT >0.80)。FFRCT每年的死亡率为2.2%,而对照组每年的死亡率为4.8%:结论:与接受标准心脏评估和护理的患者(76%)相比,诊断出静止冠状动脉缺血并在CEA后进行选择性缺血靶向冠状动脉血运重建可将5年全因死亡、心源性死亡、心肌梗死和MACE的风险降低50%以上,并提高生存率(89%)。
期刊介绍:
Journal of Vascular Surgery ® aims to be the premier international journal of medical, endovascular and surgical care of vascular diseases. It is dedicated to the science and art of vascular surgery and aims to improve the management of patients with vascular diseases by publishing relevant papers that report important medical advances, test new hypotheses, and address current controversies. To acheive this goal, the Journal will publish original clinical and laboratory studies, and reports and papers that comment on the social, economic, ethical, legal, and political factors, which relate to these aims. As the official publication of The Society for Vascular Surgery, the Journal will publish, after peer review, selected papers presented at the annual meeting of this organization and affiliated vascular societies, as well as original articles from members and non-members.