Tarek Khalife, Selim Afsar, Amy L Brien, Aakriti R Carrubba, Megan P Griffith, Katie Casper, Kristina A Butler, Sarah L Cohen Rassier
{"title":"Hysteroscopy-Guided Endometrial Sampling Diagnostic Performance in Endometrial Intraepithelial Neoplasia Patients.","authors":"Tarek Khalife, Selim Afsar, Amy L Brien, Aakriti R Carrubba, Megan P Griffith, Katie Casper, Kristina A Butler, Sarah L Cohen Rassier","doi":"10.1016/j.jmig.2025.03.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the diagnostic performance of hysteroscopy-guided versus blind sampling in detecting concurrent endometrial carcinoma in patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia and to identify factors associated with missing cancer diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Integrated academic and community healthcare system in Minnesota and Wisconsin, USA, January 1, 2018, and January 1, 2023 PARTICIPANTS: This included 151 patients diagnosed with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia during endometrial sampling who underwent a hysterectomy within three months. Patients with concurrent cancer diagnoses were excluded.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Patients diagnosed with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia using hysteroscopy-directed biopsy were compared to those diagnosed with blind-sampling methods using the pathology results of the subsequent hysterectomy specimen as the gold standard comparator to analyze rates of missed endometrial cancer diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>The primary outcome was a reduced risk of unanticipated concurrent endometrial cancer on the final hysterectomy pathology result for patients diagnosed with endometrial intraepithelial hyperplasia via a hysteroscopy-directed biopsy (OR=0.44, 95% CI=0.20-0.95, p = 0.033). In multivariate analysis, body mass index ≥30 and patient age >60 were associated with an elevated risk of endometrial cancer on final pathology (OR=4.17, 95% CI=1.51-11.51, p = 0.004; OR=5.56, 95% CI=1.22-35.21, p<0.001), respectively, and diabetes mellitus was the only independent variable associated with a higher risk of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia on final hysterectomy pathology (OR=7.01, 95% CI=1.40-35.04, p = 0.018). Age, BMI, and endometrial thickness on pre-biopsy ultrasound were not associated with an increased risk of overlooking concurrent endometrial carcinoma on final hysterectomy pathology on univariate and multivariate analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hysteroscopy-directed biopsy may reduce the risk of missing a concurrent endometrial malignancy during endometrial sampling in women with endometrial Intraepithelial neoplasia. The results affirm the superior diagnostic accuracy of hysteroscopy-directed endometrial evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":16397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2025.03.021","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To compare the diagnostic performance of hysteroscopy-guided versus blind sampling in detecting concurrent endometrial carcinoma in patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia and to identify factors associated with missing cancer diagnosis.
Design: This is a retrospective cohort study.
Setting: Integrated academic and community healthcare system in Minnesota and Wisconsin, USA, January 1, 2018, and January 1, 2023 PARTICIPANTS: This included 151 patients diagnosed with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia during endometrial sampling who underwent a hysterectomy within three months. Patients with concurrent cancer diagnoses were excluded.
Interventions: Patients diagnosed with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia using hysteroscopy-directed biopsy were compared to those diagnosed with blind-sampling methods using the pathology results of the subsequent hysterectomy specimen as the gold standard comparator to analyze rates of missed endometrial cancer diagnosis.
Measurements and main results: The primary outcome was a reduced risk of unanticipated concurrent endometrial cancer on the final hysterectomy pathology result for patients diagnosed with endometrial intraepithelial hyperplasia via a hysteroscopy-directed biopsy (OR=0.44, 95% CI=0.20-0.95, p = 0.033). In multivariate analysis, body mass index ≥30 and patient age >60 were associated with an elevated risk of endometrial cancer on final pathology (OR=4.17, 95% CI=1.51-11.51, p = 0.004; OR=5.56, 95% CI=1.22-35.21, p<0.001), respectively, and diabetes mellitus was the only independent variable associated with a higher risk of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia on final hysterectomy pathology (OR=7.01, 95% CI=1.40-35.04, p = 0.018). Age, BMI, and endometrial thickness on pre-biopsy ultrasound were not associated with an increased risk of overlooking concurrent endometrial carcinoma on final hysterectomy pathology on univariate and multivariate analyses.
Conclusion: Hysteroscopy-directed biopsy may reduce the risk of missing a concurrent endometrial malignancy during endometrial sampling in women with endometrial Intraepithelial neoplasia. The results affirm the superior diagnostic accuracy of hysteroscopy-directed endometrial evaluation.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, formerly titled The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, is an international clinical forum for the exchange and dissemination of ideas, findings and techniques relevant to gynecologic endoscopy and other minimally invasive procedures. The Journal, which presents research, clinical opinions and case reports from the brightest minds in gynecologic surgery, is an authoritative source informing practicing physicians of the latest, cutting-edge developments occurring in this emerging field.