Continuous QTc Monitoring for Patients Intoxicated with QTc Prolonging Medication in the Emergency Department: A Proof of Principle Study.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Marit Bot, Raymond J van Wijk, Hermie J Hermens, David N van der Kooi, Thomas Luttmer, Eva M Boetje, Jan C Ter Maaten, Hjalmar R Bouma, Ewoud Ter Avest
{"title":"Continuous QTc Monitoring for Patients Intoxicated with QTc Prolonging Medication in the Emergency Department: A Proof of Principle Study.","authors":"Marit Bot, Raymond J van Wijk, Hermie J Hermens, David N van der Kooi, Thomas Luttmer, Eva M Boetje, Jan C Ter Maaten, Hjalmar R Bouma, Ewoud Ter Avest","doi":"10.1016/j.jemermed.2024.11.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It can be challenging to determine when patients presenting with an overdose of QT interval prolonging drugs can be discharged safely, especially when the moment of intoxication or the substance ingested is unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In a proof of principle study, we aimed to determine whether continuous corrected QT interval (QTc) analysis can be used to establish optimal observation duration of patients intoxicated with QTc prolonging medication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For patients presenting with an intoxication with QT interval prolonging drugs in the emergency department, electrocardiography signals sampled at 500 Hz were preprocessed and the mean heart rate QTc per 5 min was calculated and plotted against time. A third order polynomial was fitted to visualize when the QTc would be highest (i.e., electrophysiological time to maximum concentration [T<sub>max</sub>]). This point in time was compared with the estimated T<sub>max</sub> based on pharmacokinetic properties of the ingested substance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a retrospective biobank-based study, a total of 22 emergency department visits (of 15 patients) were analyzed. An electrophysiological T<sub>max</sub> could be calculated for 17 of 22 visits. The remaining 5 patients presented either long after the electrophysiological T<sub>max</sub> (n = 4) or were admitted to the ward before reaching the T<sub>max</sub> (n = 1). The mean (SD) difference between the estimated T<sub>max</sub> based on drug properties and the calculated electrophysiological T<sub>max</sub> was 18 (133) min (range -158 to 296 min). Despite the wide range, there was a significant correlation between recorded electrophysiological T<sub>max</sub> and estimated T<sub>max</sub> (r = 0.67, p = 0.012).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Continuous electrophysiological monitoring can be used as an adjunct to determine the toxicokinetic T<sub>max</sub> for patients presenting with an intoxication, especially when the time of ingestion or the substance ingested is unknown.</p>","PeriodicalId":16085,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2024.11.007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: It can be challenging to determine when patients presenting with an overdose of QT interval prolonging drugs can be discharged safely, especially when the moment of intoxication or the substance ingested is unknown.

Objective: In a proof of principle study, we aimed to determine whether continuous corrected QT interval (QTc) analysis can be used to establish optimal observation duration of patients intoxicated with QTc prolonging medication.

Methods: For patients presenting with an intoxication with QT interval prolonging drugs in the emergency department, electrocardiography signals sampled at 500 Hz were preprocessed and the mean heart rate QTc per 5 min was calculated and plotted against time. A third order polynomial was fitted to visualize when the QTc would be highest (i.e., electrophysiological time to maximum concentration [Tmax]). This point in time was compared with the estimated Tmax based on pharmacokinetic properties of the ingested substance.

Results: In a retrospective biobank-based study, a total of 22 emergency department visits (of 15 patients) were analyzed. An electrophysiological Tmax could be calculated for 17 of 22 visits. The remaining 5 patients presented either long after the electrophysiological Tmax (n = 4) or were admitted to the ward before reaching the Tmax (n = 1). The mean (SD) difference between the estimated Tmax based on drug properties and the calculated electrophysiological Tmax was 18 (133) min (range -158 to 296 min). Despite the wide range, there was a significant correlation between recorded electrophysiological Tmax and estimated Tmax (r = 0.67, p = 0.012).

Conclusions: Continuous electrophysiological monitoring can be used as an adjunct to determine the toxicokinetic Tmax for patients presenting with an intoxication, especially when the time of ingestion or the substance ingested is unknown.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Emergency Medicine
Journal of Emergency Medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
339
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Emergency Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed publication featuring original contributions of interest to both the academic and practicing emergency physician. JEM, published monthly, contains research papers and clinical studies as well as articles focusing on the training of emergency physicians and on the practice of emergency medicine. The Journal features the following sections: • Original Contributions • Clinical Communications: Pediatric, Adult, OB/GYN • Selected Topics: Toxicology, Prehospital Care, The Difficult Airway, Aeromedical Emergencies, Disaster Medicine, Cardiology Commentary, Emergency Radiology, Critical Care, Sports Medicine, Wound Care • Techniques and Procedures • Technical Tips • Clinical Laboratory in Emergency Medicine • Pharmacology in Emergency Medicine • Case Presentations of the Harvard Emergency Medicine Residency • Visual Diagnosis in Emergency Medicine • Medical Classics • Emergency Forum • Editorial(s) • Letters to the Editor • Education • Administration of Emergency Medicine • International Emergency Medicine • Computers in Emergency Medicine • Violence: Recognition, Management, and Prevention • Ethics • Humanities and Medicine • American Academy of Emergency Medicine • AAEM Medical Student Forum • Book and Other Media Reviews • Calendar of Events • Abstracts • Trauma Reports • Ultrasound in Emergency Medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信