Spontaneous recovery from rocuronium measured by mechanomyography during 100- or 200-Hz tetanic stimulations compared to normalized train-of-four with acceleromyography.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Philippe E Dubois, Fabien Moreillon, Benoit Bihin, Clotilde De Dorlodot, Sabrina Meyer, Adrien Maseri, Philippe A Passeraub, Alain A d'Hollander
{"title":"Spontaneous recovery from rocuronium measured by mechanomyography during 100- or 200-Hz tetanic stimulations compared to normalized train-of-four with acceleromyography.","authors":"Philippe E Dubois, Fabien Moreillon, Benoit Bihin, Clotilde De Dorlodot, Sabrina Meyer, Adrien Maseri, Philippe A Passeraub, Alain A d'Hollander","doi":"10.1007/s10877-025-01282-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neuromuscular block recovery was evaluated using high-frequency tetanic ulnar nerve simulations compared to normalized train-of-four (NTOF) in anesthetized patients. Under intravenous general anesthesia, we compared rocuronium-induced neuromuscular recovery using 5 s 100- and 200-Hz tetanic stimulations via isometric mechanomyography to acceleromyographic NTOF in 20 consenting patients. The primary outcome was the comparison by Student's t-tests of 100- and 200-Hz tetanic fade ratios (residual force at the end of the contraction / maximal force reached during the 5 s) before rocuronium administration and at different recovery levels. The secondary outcome was the quantification of any significant fade occurring with 100- and 200-Hz stimulations after reaching the acceleromyographic NTOF ratio of 0.9 during subsequent stages of spontaneous recovery until their fade ratios exceeded 0.9. During early (TOF count ≥ 1) and intermediate (NTOF ratio ≥ 0.5) stages of recovery, both 100- and 200-Hz tetanic fade ratios were similarly low. However, during late recovery when NTOF ratio ≥ 0.9, 200-Hz stimulation induced a significantly deeper muscular fade than 100-Hz (tetanic fade ratio 0.20 ± 0.23 vs. 0.64 ± 0.29, P < 0.001). The delays between the recovery of NTOF ratio 0.9 and 100- or 200-Hz tetanic fade ratio 0.9 were 7.7 ± 7.1 and 43.6 ± 14.6 min, respectively. In anesthetized humans, mechanomyographic 200-Hz tetanic stimulation detects lighter levels of residual paralysis than NTOF and 100-Hz tetanic stimulation during a valuable additional period. Registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov Registry NCT05474638 on July 15th 2022.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-025-01282-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Neuromuscular block recovery was evaluated using high-frequency tetanic ulnar nerve simulations compared to normalized train-of-four (NTOF) in anesthetized patients. Under intravenous general anesthesia, we compared rocuronium-induced neuromuscular recovery using 5 s 100- and 200-Hz tetanic stimulations via isometric mechanomyography to acceleromyographic NTOF in 20 consenting patients. The primary outcome was the comparison by Student's t-tests of 100- and 200-Hz tetanic fade ratios (residual force at the end of the contraction / maximal force reached during the 5 s) before rocuronium administration and at different recovery levels. The secondary outcome was the quantification of any significant fade occurring with 100- and 200-Hz stimulations after reaching the acceleromyographic NTOF ratio of 0.9 during subsequent stages of spontaneous recovery until their fade ratios exceeded 0.9. During early (TOF count ≥ 1) and intermediate (NTOF ratio ≥ 0.5) stages of recovery, both 100- and 200-Hz tetanic fade ratios were similarly low. However, during late recovery when NTOF ratio ≥ 0.9, 200-Hz stimulation induced a significantly deeper muscular fade than 100-Hz (tetanic fade ratio 0.20 ± 0.23 vs. 0.64 ± 0.29, P < 0.001). The delays between the recovery of NTOF ratio 0.9 and 100- or 200-Hz tetanic fade ratio 0.9 were 7.7 ± 7.1 and 43.6 ± 14.6 min, respectively. In anesthetized humans, mechanomyographic 200-Hz tetanic stimulation detects lighter levels of residual paralysis than NTOF and 100-Hz tetanic stimulation during a valuable additional period. Registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov Registry NCT05474638 on July 15th 2022.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.60%
发文量
144
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing is a clinical journal publishing papers related to technology in the fields of anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, emergency medicine, and peri-operative medicine. The journal has links with numerous specialist societies, including editorial board representatives from the European Society for Computing and Technology in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (ESCTAIC), the Society for Technology in Anesthesia (STA), the Society for Complex Acute Illness (SCAI) and the NAVAt (NAVigating towards your Anaestheisa Targets) group. The journal publishes original papers, narrative and systematic reviews, technological notes, letters to the editor, editorial or commentary papers, and policy statements or guidelines from national or international societies. The journal encourages debate on published papers and technology, including letters commenting on previous publications or technological concerns. The journal occasionally publishes special issues with technological or clinical themes, or reports and abstracts from scientificmeetings. Special issues proposals should be sent to the Editor-in-Chief. Specific details of types of papers, and the clinical and technological content of papers considered within scope can be found in instructions for authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信