Luca M Heising, Frank Verhaegen, Stefan G Scheib, Maria J G Jacobs, Carol X J Ou, Viola Mottarella, Yin-Ho Chong, Mariangela Zamburlini, Sebastiaan M J J G Nijsten, Ans Swinnen, Michel Öllers, Cecile J A Wolfs
{"title":"Toward a human-centric co-design methodology for AI detection of differences between planned and delivered dose in radiotherapy.","authors":"Luca M Heising, Frank Verhaegen, Stefan G Scheib, Maria J G Jacobs, Carol X J Ou, Viola Mottarella, Yin-Ho Chong, Mariangela Zamburlini, Sebastiaan M J J G Nijsten, Ans Swinnen, Michel Öllers, Cecile J A Wolfs","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Many artificial intelligence (AI) solutions have been proposed to enhance the radiotherapy (RT) workflow, but limited applications have been implemented to date, suggesting an implementation gap. One contributing factor to this gap is a misalignment between AI systems and their users. To address the AI implementation gap, we propose a human-centric methodology, novel in RT, for an interface design of an AI-driven RT treatment error detection system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 5-day design sprint was set up with a multi-disciplinary team of clinical and research staff and a commercial company. In the design sprint, an interface was prototyped to aid medical physicists in catching treatment errors during daily treatment fractions using dose-guided RT (DGRT) with a portal imager.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The design sprint resulted in a simulated prototype of an interface supported by all stakeholders. Important features of an interface include the AI certainty metric, explainable AI features, feedback options, and decision aid. The prototype was well-received by expert users.</p><p><strong>Conclusion/discussion: </strong>Using a co-creation strategy, which is a novel approach in RT, we were able to prototype a novel human-interpretable interface to detect RT treatment errors and aid the DGRT workflow. Users showed confidence that the overall design method and the proposed prototype could lead to a viable clinical implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":" ","pages":"e70071"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.70071","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Many artificial intelligence (AI) solutions have been proposed to enhance the radiotherapy (RT) workflow, but limited applications have been implemented to date, suggesting an implementation gap. One contributing factor to this gap is a misalignment between AI systems and their users. To address the AI implementation gap, we propose a human-centric methodology, novel in RT, for an interface design of an AI-driven RT treatment error detection system.
Methods: A 5-day design sprint was set up with a multi-disciplinary team of clinical and research staff and a commercial company. In the design sprint, an interface was prototyped to aid medical physicists in catching treatment errors during daily treatment fractions using dose-guided RT (DGRT) with a portal imager.
Results: The design sprint resulted in a simulated prototype of an interface supported by all stakeholders. Important features of an interface include the AI certainty metric, explainable AI features, feedback options, and decision aid. The prototype was well-received by expert users.
Conclusion/discussion: Using a co-creation strategy, which is a novel approach in RT, we were able to prototype a novel human-interpretable interface to detect RT treatment errors and aid the DGRT workflow. Users showed confidence that the overall design method and the proposed prototype could lead to a viable clinical implementation.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission.
JACMP will publish:
-Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500.
-Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed.
-Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references.
-Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents.
-Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews.
-Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics.
-Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic