Dedicated rapid response team implementation associated with reductions in hospital mortality and hospital expenses: a retrospective cohort analysis.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jacob Sessim-Filho, Renato Palacio de Azevedo, Antonildes N Assuncao-Jr, Marcia Martiniano de Sousa E Sá Morgado, Felipe Duarte Silva, Laerte Pastore, Luiz Francisco Cardoso, Fernando Ganem
{"title":"Dedicated rapid response team implementation associated with reductions in hospital mortality and hospital expenses: a retrospective cohort analysis.","authors":"Jacob Sessim-Filho, Renato Palacio de Azevedo, Antonildes N Assuncao-Jr, Marcia Martiniano de Sousa E Sá Morgado, Felipe Duarte Silva, Laerte Pastore, Luiz Francisco Cardoso, Fernando Ganem","doi":"10.1093/intqhc/mzaf030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The clinical impact of the implementation of rapid response teams (RRTs) remains controversial in the literature. Furthermore, data on the financial impact of this intervention remain scarce. Therefore, we aim to assess the impact of the implementation of a dedicated RRT on hospital mortality and hospital expenses of patients experiencing acute clinical deterioration requiring an unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admission.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective single-centre cohort study of adult patients experiencing acute clinical deterioration requiring an unplanned ICU admission before and after the transition of the RRT leadership to a dedicated group on 1 June 2014. Admissions that occurred 30 days before and 30 days after were excluded because they included the training period of the team members. Therefore, the PRE group encompassed patients who required an unplanned ICU admission between 1 May 2012, and 30 April 2014, and the POST group included those admitted to the ICU between 1 July 2014, and 30 June 2016. Patients were matched by propensity score according to a calibration of 0.2 and at a 1:1 ratio using the nearest neighbour matching method. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, with secondary outcomes including ICU mortality, hospital and ICU length of stay, ICU readmission rate within 48 h, and hospital expenses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 977 consecutive patients: 470 in the PRE group and 507 in the POST group. Following propensity score matching, 343 pairs (totalling 686 patients) were identified. Analyses revealed reductions in in-hospital mortality rate (34.7% PRE vs. 22.7% POST; odds ratio 0.590 [95% CI: 0.254-0.927], P < .001) and ICU mortality rate (19.5% PRE vs. 12.8% POST; odds ratio 0.501 [95% CI: 0.087-0.915]; P = .022). Decreases in hospital and ICU length of stay and use of ICU support measures were also observed, accompanied by a 23.2% reduction in hospital expenditure (P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Transitioning to a dedicated RRT was associated with reduced in-hospital mortality and hospital resource utilization. Future research in diverse settings and cost-effectiveness analyses are warranted to confirm these findings and explore the economic impacts of RRTs.</p>","PeriodicalId":13800,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Quality in Health Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12036571/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Quality in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzaf030","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The clinical impact of the implementation of rapid response teams (RRTs) remains controversial in the literature. Furthermore, data on the financial impact of this intervention remain scarce. Therefore, we aim to assess the impact of the implementation of a dedicated RRT on hospital mortality and hospital expenses of patients experiencing acute clinical deterioration requiring an unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admission.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective single-centre cohort study of adult patients experiencing acute clinical deterioration requiring an unplanned ICU admission before and after the transition of the RRT leadership to a dedicated group on 1 June 2014. Admissions that occurred 30 days before and 30 days after were excluded because they included the training period of the team members. Therefore, the PRE group encompassed patients who required an unplanned ICU admission between 1 May 2012, and 30 April 2014, and the POST group included those admitted to the ICU between 1 July 2014, and 30 June 2016. Patients were matched by propensity score according to a calibration of 0.2 and at a 1:1 ratio using the nearest neighbour matching method. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, with secondary outcomes including ICU mortality, hospital and ICU length of stay, ICU readmission rate within 48 h, and hospital expenses.

Results: The study included 977 consecutive patients: 470 in the PRE group and 507 in the POST group. Following propensity score matching, 343 pairs (totalling 686 patients) were identified. Analyses revealed reductions in in-hospital mortality rate (34.7% PRE vs. 22.7% POST; odds ratio 0.590 [95% CI: 0.254-0.927], P < .001) and ICU mortality rate (19.5% PRE vs. 12.8% POST; odds ratio 0.501 [95% CI: 0.087-0.915]; P = .022). Decreases in hospital and ICU length of stay and use of ICU support measures were also observed, accompanied by a 23.2% reduction in hospital expenditure (P < .001).

Conclusion: Transitioning to a dedicated RRT was associated with reduced in-hospital mortality and hospital resource utilization. Future research in diverse settings and cost-effectiveness analyses are warranted to confirm these findings and explore the economic impacts of RRTs.

专门的快速反应小组实施与降低医院死亡率和医院费用相关:回顾性队列分析。
引言:在文献中,实施快速反应小组的临床影响仍然存在争议。此外,关于这种干预的财政影响的数据仍然很少。因此,我们的目的是评估实施专门的RRT对经历急性临床恶化需要非计划ICU住院的患者的医院死亡率和医院费用的影响。方法:我们对2014年6月1日快速反应小组领导转变为专门小组之前和之后经历急性临床恶化需要非计划入住ICU的成年患者进行了回顾性单中心队列研究。之前30天和之后30天的录取被排除在外,因为它们包含了团队成员的培训期间。因此,PRE组包括2012年5月1日至2014年4月30日期间需要非计划入住ICU的患者,POST组包括2014年7月1日至2016年6月30日期间入住ICU的患者。采用最近邻匹配法,根据校准值0.2和1:1比例的倾向评分对患者进行匹配。主要结局是住院死亡率,次要结局包括重症监护病房死亡率、住院和重症监护病房住院时间、48小时内重症监护病房再入院率和医院费用。结果:该研究包括977例连续患者:PRE组470例,POST组507例。根据倾向评分匹配,确定了343对(共686例患者)。分析显示住院死亡率降低(术前34.7% vs术后22.7%;优势比0.590 [95% CI: 0.254-0.927], P < 0.001)和重症监护病房死亡率(术前19.5% vs.术后12.8%;优势比0.501 [95% CI: 0.087-0.915];P = 0.022)。医院和重症监护病房的住院时间和重症监护病房支持措施的使用也有所减少,同时医院支出减少了23.2% (P < 0.001)。结论:过渡到专门的快速反应小组与降低住院死亡率和医院资源利用率有关。未来有必要在不同的环境下进行研究,并进行成本效益分析,以证实这些发现,并探讨快速反应小组的经济影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.80%
发文量
87
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal for Quality in Health Care makes activities and research related to quality and safety in health care available to a worldwide readership. The Journal publishes papers in all disciplines related to the quality and safety of health care, including health services research, health care evaluation, technology assessment, health economics, utilization review, cost containment, and nursing care research, as well as clinical research related to quality of care. This peer-reviewed journal is truly interdisciplinary and includes contributions from representatives of all health professions such as doctors, nurses, quality assurance professionals, managers, politicians, social workers, and therapists, as well as researchers from health-related backgrounds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信