Dedicated Rapid Response Team Implementation Associated with Reductions in Hospital Mortality and Hospital Expenses: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jacob Sessim Filho, Renato Palacio de Azevedo, Antonildes Nascimento Assunção, Marcia Martiniano de Sousa E Sá, Felipe Duarte Silva, Laerte Pastore Jnr, Luiz Francisco Cardoso, Fernando Ganem
{"title":"Dedicated Rapid Response Team Implementation Associated with Reductions in Hospital Mortality and Hospital Expenses: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.","authors":"Jacob Sessim Filho, Renato Palacio de Azevedo, Antonildes Nascimento Assunção, Marcia Martiniano de Sousa E Sá, Felipe Duarte Silva, Laerte Pastore Jnr, Luiz Francisco Cardoso, Fernando Ganem","doi":"10.1093/intqhc/mzaf030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The clinical impact of the implementation of rapid response teams remains controversial in the literature. Furthermore, data on the financial impact of this intervention remain scarce. Therefore, we aim to assess the impact of the implementation of a dedicated RRT on hospital mortality and hospital expenses of patients experiencing acute clinical deterioration requiring an unplanned ICU admission.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective single-centre cohort study of adult patients experiencing acute clinical deterioration requiring an unplanned ICU admission before and after the transition of the rapid response team leadership to a dedicated group on June 1, 2014. Admissions that occurred 30 days before and 30 days after were excluded because they included the training period of the team members. Therefore, the PRE group encompassed patients who required an unplanned ICU admission between May 1, 2012, and April 30, 2014, and the POST group included those admitted to the ICU between July 1, 2014, and June 30, 2016. Patients were matched by propensity score according to a calibration of 0.2 and at a 1:1 ratio using the nearest neighbour matching method. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, with secondary outcomes including intensive care unit mortality, hospital and intensive care unit length of stay, intensive care unit readmission rate within 48 hours, and hospital expenses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 977 consecutive patients: 470 in the PRE group and 507 in the POST group. Following propensity score matching, 343 pairs (totalling 686 patients) were identified. Analyses revealed reductions in in-hospital mortality rate (34.7% PRE vs. 22.7% POST; odds ratio 0.590 [95% CI: 0.254-0.927], P < 0.001) and intensive care unit mortality rate (19.5% PRE vs. 12.8% POST; odds ratio 0.501 [95% CI: 0.087-0.915]; P = 0.022). Decreases in hospital and intensive care unit length of stay and use of intensive care unit support measures were also observed, accompanied by a 23.2% reduction in hospital expenditure (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Transitioning to a dedicated rapid response team was associated with reduced in-hospital mortality and hospital resource utilisation. Future research in diverse settings and cost-effectiveness analyses are warranted to confirm these findings and explore the economic impacts of rapid response teams.</p>","PeriodicalId":13800,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Quality in Health Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Quality in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzaf030","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The clinical impact of the implementation of rapid response teams remains controversial in the literature. Furthermore, data on the financial impact of this intervention remain scarce. Therefore, we aim to assess the impact of the implementation of a dedicated RRT on hospital mortality and hospital expenses of patients experiencing acute clinical deterioration requiring an unplanned ICU admission.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective single-centre cohort study of adult patients experiencing acute clinical deterioration requiring an unplanned ICU admission before and after the transition of the rapid response team leadership to a dedicated group on June 1, 2014. Admissions that occurred 30 days before and 30 days after were excluded because they included the training period of the team members. Therefore, the PRE group encompassed patients who required an unplanned ICU admission between May 1, 2012, and April 30, 2014, and the POST group included those admitted to the ICU between July 1, 2014, and June 30, 2016. Patients were matched by propensity score according to a calibration of 0.2 and at a 1:1 ratio using the nearest neighbour matching method. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, with secondary outcomes including intensive care unit mortality, hospital and intensive care unit length of stay, intensive care unit readmission rate within 48 hours, and hospital expenses.

Results: The study included 977 consecutive patients: 470 in the PRE group and 507 in the POST group. Following propensity score matching, 343 pairs (totalling 686 patients) were identified. Analyses revealed reductions in in-hospital mortality rate (34.7% PRE vs. 22.7% POST; odds ratio 0.590 [95% CI: 0.254-0.927], P < 0.001) and intensive care unit mortality rate (19.5% PRE vs. 12.8% POST; odds ratio 0.501 [95% CI: 0.087-0.915]; P = 0.022). Decreases in hospital and intensive care unit length of stay and use of intensive care unit support measures were also observed, accompanied by a 23.2% reduction in hospital expenditure (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Transitioning to a dedicated rapid response team was associated with reduced in-hospital mortality and hospital resource utilisation. Future research in diverse settings and cost-effectiveness analyses are warranted to confirm these findings and explore the economic impacts of rapid response teams.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.80%
发文量
87
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal for Quality in Health Care makes activities and research related to quality and safety in health care available to a worldwide readership. The Journal publishes papers in all disciplines related to the quality and safety of health care, including health services research, health care evaluation, technology assessment, health economics, utilization review, cost containment, and nursing care research, as well as clinical research related to quality of care. This peer-reviewed journal is truly interdisciplinary and includes contributions from representatives of all health professions such as doctors, nurses, quality assurance professionals, managers, politicians, social workers, and therapists, as well as researchers from health-related backgrounds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信