Emergency department opioid prescribing trends among provider types: an analysis of the NHAMCS, 2019-2021.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Carrson French, Jace Jackson, Zach Monahan, Kelly Murray, Micah Hartwell
{"title":"Emergency department opioid prescribing trends among provider types: an analysis of the NHAMCS, 2019-2021.","authors":"Carrson French, Jace Jackson, Zach Monahan, Kelly Murray, Micah Hartwell","doi":"10.1007/s11739-025-03923-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite efforts to mitigate high opioid prescription frequencies, previous research showed minimal change within emergency departments (ED) in the United States, and a few studies investigate prescription provider types. Thus, our primary objective was to assess opioid prescribing rates by differing healthcare team members using data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS). Using the 2019-2021 NHAMCS, we calculated the overall opioid prescription rate during ED visits by provider type. Next, we estimated opioid prescription rates by provider type annually and determined differences by year using design-based X<sup>2</sup> tests and regression models. From 2019 through 2021, 7428 of 50,548 visits involved opioids, representing 15.62% of all ED visits. During this timeframe, 16.59% of total encounters with opioid prescriptions were among attending/consulting physicians. This was followed by physician assistants (13.91%), nurse practitioners (10.67%), and residents (7.28%). Compared to 2019, opioid prescribing rates showed no significant changes; however, resident physicians showed a significant decrease, and RNs showed a significant increase. From our analysis, opioid prescribing rates in the ED were highest among attending/consulting physicians, and rates among physician assistants and nurse practitioners were higher than 10%. Resident physicians had a significant decrease in opioid prescriptions, while RNs had an increase-likely due to new laws enacted during this timeframe. Removing barriers to alternative pain management for acute and long-term care may lessen rates of opioid prescriptions-including patient and provider training, physical therapists inclusion, and osteopathic manipulative therapy incorporation.</p>","PeriodicalId":13662,"journal":{"name":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-025-03923-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite efforts to mitigate high opioid prescription frequencies, previous research showed minimal change within emergency departments (ED) in the United States, and a few studies investigate prescription provider types. Thus, our primary objective was to assess opioid prescribing rates by differing healthcare team members using data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS). Using the 2019-2021 NHAMCS, we calculated the overall opioid prescription rate during ED visits by provider type. Next, we estimated opioid prescription rates by provider type annually and determined differences by year using design-based X2 tests and regression models. From 2019 through 2021, 7428 of 50,548 visits involved opioids, representing 15.62% of all ED visits. During this timeframe, 16.59% of total encounters with opioid prescriptions were among attending/consulting physicians. This was followed by physician assistants (13.91%), nurse practitioners (10.67%), and residents (7.28%). Compared to 2019, opioid prescribing rates showed no significant changes; however, resident physicians showed a significant decrease, and RNs showed a significant increase. From our analysis, opioid prescribing rates in the ED were highest among attending/consulting physicians, and rates among physician assistants and nurse practitioners were higher than 10%. Resident physicians had a significant decrease in opioid prescriptions, while RNs had an increase-likely due to new laws enacted during this timeframe. Removing barriers to alternative pain management for acute and long-term care may lessen rates of opioid prescriptions-including patient and provider training, physical therapists inclusion, and osteopathic manipulative therapy incorporation.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Internal and Emergency Medicine
Internal and Emergency Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
258
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Internal and Emergency Medicine (IEM) is an independent, international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal designed for internists and emergency physicians. IEM publishes a variety of manuscript types including Original investigations, Review articles, Letters to the Editor, Editorials and Commentaries. Occasionally IEM accepts unsolicited Reviews, Commentaries or Editorials. The journal is divided into three sections, i.e., Internal Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment, with three separate editorial boards. In the Internal Medicine section, invited Case records and Physical examinations, devoted to underlining the role of a clinical approach in selected clinical cases, are also published. The Emergency Medicine section will include a Morbidity and Mortality Report and an Airway Forum concerning the management of difficult airway problems. As far as Critical Care is becoming an integral part of Emergency Medicine, a new sub-section will report the literature that concerns the interface not only for the care of the critical patient in the Emergency Department, but also in the Intensive Care Unit. Finally, in the Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment section brief discussions of topics of evidence-based medicine (Cochrane’s corner) and Research updates are published. IEM encourages letters of rebuttal and criticism of published articles. Topics of interest include all subjects that relate to the science and practice of Internal and Emergency Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信