Support Person Holding Back Information in Medical Interactions: The Role of Empathic Communication and Disclosure Efficacy.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Lauren E Lee, Maria K Venetis, Elizabeth Broadbridge, Katie A Devine, Kathryn Greene
{"title":"Support Person Holding Back Information in Medical Interactions: The Role of Empathic Communication and Disclosure Efficacy.","authors":"Lauren E Lee, Maria K Venetis, Elizabeth Broadbridge, Katie A Devine, Kathryn Greene","doi":"10.1080/10410236.2025.2484256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Support people are often both physically and emotionally involved in patients' cancer-care trajectories with first-hand knowledge of the patient's health; they also harbor their own fears and concerns. When present in the medical interaction, support people report hesitancy to share patient information and concerns with clinicians, although they deem this information is important for patient care. Framed in the disclosure decision-making model, this study examines how support people's perceptions of clinician empathic communication affect their disclosure efficacy, and how these concepts relate to outcomes of holding back information about patient health or their own fears and concerns. Participants included support people (<i>N</i>  = 129) recruited from the Love Research Army® who completed an online survey. Analyses investigated how disclosure efficacy influences the association between perceived clinician empathic communication and support person holding back patient health information (model 1) and support person holding back their own fears and concerns (model 2). Overall, results identify differences in support people's holding back when making disclosure decisions related to patients' physical health versus their own fears and concerns. Greater disclosure efficacy shaped the relationship between perceived clinician empathic communication and lower levels of holding back patient health information, bolstering the importance of clinician empathic communication with support people of cancer patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12889,"journal":{"name":"Health Communication","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2025.2484256","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Support people are often both physically and emotionally involved in patients' cancer-care trajectories with first-hand knowledge of the patient's health; they also harbor their own fears and concerns. When present in the medical interaction, support people report hesitancy to share patient information and concerns with clinicians, although they deem this information is important for patient care. Framed in the disclosure decision-making model, this study examines how support people's perceptions of clinician empathic communication affect their disclosure efficacy, and how these concepts relate to outcomes of holding back information about patient health or their own fears and concerns. Participants included support people (N  = 129) recruited from the Love Research Army® who completed an online survey. Analyses investigated how disclosure efficacy influences the association between perceived clinician empathic communication and support person holding back patient health information (model 1) and support person holding back their own fears and concerns (model 2). Overall, results identify differences in support people's holding back when making disclosure decisions related to patients' physical health versus their own fears and concerns. Greater disclosure efficacy shaped the relationship between perceived clinician empathic communication and lower levels of holding back patient health information, bolstering the importance of clinician empathic communication with support people of cancer patients.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: As an outlet for scholarly intercourse between medical and social sciences, this noteworthy journal seeks to improve practical communication between caregivers and patients and between institutions and the public. Outstanding editorial board members and contributors from both medical and social science arenas collaborate to meet the challenges inherent in this goal. Although most inclusions are data-based, the journal also publishes pedagogical, methodological, theoretical, and applied articles using both quantitative or qualitative methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信