Beyond Narrative Relief: Exploring the Impacts of Lacking Feedback and Perceived Cyber-Ostracism Based on the Temporal Need-Threat Model.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Xing Zhang, Jinjin Zhao
{"title":"Beyond Narrative Relief: Exploring the Impacts of Lacking Feedback and Perceived Cyber-Ostracism Based on the Temporal Need-Threat Model.","authors":"Xing Zhang, Jinjin Zhao","doi":"10.1080/10410236.2025.2481473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Social media are increasingly becoming public venues for patients to create and share illness narratives. While prior research has primarily focused on the positive and supportive roles of social media in patients' seeking and obtaining social support, little is known about the possible negative impacts of lacking feedback when sharing illness narratives on these connected and interactive platforms. By incorporating the notion of cyber-ostracism from social psychology and drawing upon Williams's temporal need-threat model (TNTM), this study proposed and tested a series of serial-parallel mediation models that link feedback amount, psychological well-being, and/or various coping intentions (i.e. to withdraw from social media narration sharing and to positively/negatively comment on others' narratives), sequentially through perceived ostracism and different need satisfaction (i.e. for belonging, self-esteem, meaningful existence, and control). Findings of this study move beyond the longstanding focus on the narrative relief effects, shedding light on the backfire effects of sharing illness narratives when such narratives received little or even no feedback from others in the social media environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":12889,"journal":{"name":"Health Communication","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2025.2481473","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social media are increasingly becoming public venues for patients to create and share illness narratives. While prior research has primarily focused on the positive and supportive roles of social media in patients' seeking and obtaining social support, little is known about the possible negative impacts of lacking feedback when sharing illness narratives on these connected and interactive platforms. By incorporating the notion of cyber-ostracism from social psychology and drawing upon Williams's temporal need-threat model (TNTM), this study proposed and tested a series of serial-parallel mediation models that link feedback amount, psychological well-being, and/or various coping intentions (i.e. to withdraw from social media narration sharing and to positively/negatively comment on others' narratives), sequentially through perceived ostracism and different need satisfaction (i.e. for belonging, self-esteem, meaningful existence, and control). Findings of this study move beyond the longstanding focus on the narrative relief effects, shedding light on the backfire effects of sharing illness narratives when such narratives received little or even no feedback from others in the social media environment.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: As an outlet for scholarly intercourse between medical and social sciences, this noteworthy journal seeks to improve practical communication between caregivers and patients and between institutions and the public. Outstanding editorial board members and contributors from both medical and social science arenas collaborate to meet the challenges inherent in this goal. Although most inclusions are data-based, the journal also publishes pedagogical, methodological, theoretical, and applied articles using both quantitative or qualitative methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信