Catherine Pham, Deana Bitar, Fang Niu, Kim Ngoc Le, Rita Lai-Han Hui, Thomas Delate
{"title":"Perceptions of patients with inflammatory bowel diseases on switching from reference product adalimumab to biosimilar adalimumab-atto.","authors":"Catherine Pham, Deana Bitar, Fang Niu, Kim Ngoc Le, Rita Lai-Han Hui, Thomas Delate","doi":"10.1080/14712598.2025.2488222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There may be patient concerns with switching to a biosimilar product. The purpose of this study was to describe the perspectives of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) after switching from reference product (RP) adalimumab to adalimumab-atto.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This was a telephonic survey of US patients with IBD conducted in June-July 2023 among adult, English-speaking patients who were switched to biosimilar adalimumab-atto from RP adalimumab within the previous 100 days, and were receiving adalimumab-atto at the time of the survey. Consented participants were queried on adalimumab-atto safety and effectiveness, cost, product preference, and education received for the switch. Descriptive statistics were used to depict responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 250 patients contacted, 154 participants completed the survey. Respondents (77.9%) reported no concerns with loss of disease control, potential side effects (67.9%), or cost (89.5%) after switching. About 28.7% reported a preference for adalimumab-atto, while 39.3% reported no preference between products. About 43.7% reported being satisfied/very satisfied with the education they received, while 65.1% stated they did not feel they knew enough about adalimumab-atto.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was widespread satisfaction with adalimumab-atto after switching from RP adalimumab. Nevertheless, participants reported limited knowledge of adalimumab-atto, suggesting a need for enhanced education on biosimilars.</p>","PeriodicalId":12084,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14712598.2025.2488222","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: There may be patient concerns with switching to a biosimilar product. The purpose of this study was to describe the perspectives of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) after switching from reference product (RP) adalimumab to adalimumab-atto.
Research design and methods: This was a telephonic survey of US patients with IBD conducted in June-July 2023 among adult, English-speaking patients who were switched to biosimilar adalimumab-atto from RP adalimumab within the previous 100 days, and were receiving adalimumab-atto at the time of the survey. Consented participants were queried on adalimumab-atto safety and effectiveness, cost, product preference, and education received for the switch. Descriptive statistics were used to depict responses.
Results: Of the 250 patients contacted, 154 participants completed the survey. Respondents (77.9%) reported no concerns with loss of disease control, potential side effects (67.9%), or cost (89.5%) after switching. About 28.7% reported a preference for adalimumab-atto, while 39.3% reported no preference between products. About 43.7% reported being satisfied/very satisfied with the education they received, while 65.1% stated they did not feel they knew enough about adalimumab-atto.
Conclusions: There was widespread satisfaction with adalimumab-atto after switching from RP adalimumab. Nevertheless, participants reported limited knowledge of adalimumab-atto, suggesting a need for enhanced education on biosimilars.
期刊介绍:
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy (1471-2598; 1744-7682) is a MEDLINE-indexed, international journal publishing peer-reviewed research across all aspects of biological therapy.
Each article is structured to incorporate the author’s own expert opinion on the impact of the topic on research and clinical practice and the scope for future development.
The audience consists of scientists and managers in the healthcare and biopharmaceutical industries and others closely involved in the development and application of biological therapies for the treatment of human disease.
The journal welcomes:
Reviews covering therapeutic antibodies and vaccines, peptides and proteins, gene therapies and gene transfer technologies, cell-based therapies and regenerative medicine
Drug evaluations reviewing the clinical data on a particular biological agent
Original research papers reporting the results of clinical investigations on biological agents and biotherapeutic-based studies with a strong link to clinical practice
Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Collection format and includes the following sections:
Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results;
Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.