Perceptions of patients with inflammatory bowel diseases on switching from reference product adalimumab to biosimilar adalimumab-atto.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Catherine Pham, Deana Bitar, Fang Niu, Kim Ngoc Le, Rita Lai-Han Hui, Thomas Delate
{"title":"Perceptions of patients with inflammatory bowel diseases on switching from reference product adalimumab to biosimilar adalimumab-atto.","authors":"Catherine Pham, Deana Bitar, Fang Niu, Kim Ngoc Le, Rita Lai-Han Hui, Thomas Delate","doi":"10.1080/14712598.2025.2488222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There may be patient concerns with switching to a biosimilar product. The purpose of this study was to describe the perspectives of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) after switching from reference product (RP) adalimumab to adalimumab-atto.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This was a telephonic survey of US patients with IBD conducted in June-July 2023 among adult, English-speaking patients who were switched to biosimilar adalimumab-atto from RP adalimumab within the previous 100 days, and were receiving adalimumab-atto at the time of the survey. Consented participants were queried on adalimumab-atto safety and effectiveness, cost, product preference, and education received for the switch. Descriptive statistics were used to depict responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 250 patients contacted, 154 participants completed the survey. Respondents (77.9%) reported no concerns with loss of disease control, potential side effects (67.9%), or cost (89.5%) after switching. About 28.7% reported a preference for adalimumab-atto, while 39.3% reported no preference between products. About 43.7% reported being satisfied/very satisfied with the education they received, while 65.1% stated they did not feel they knew enough about adalimumab-atto.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was widespread satisfaction with adalimumab-atto after switching from RP adalimumab. Nevertheless, participants reported limited knowledge of adalimumab-atto, suggesting a need for enhanced education on biosimilars.</p>","PeriodicalId":12084,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14712598.2025.2488222","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There may be patient concerns with switching to a biosimilar product. The purpose of this study was to describe the perspectives of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) after switching from reference product (RP) adalimumab to adalimumab-atto.

Research design and methods: This was a telephonic survey of US patients with IBD conducted in June-July 2023 among adult, English-speaking patients who were switched to biosimilar adalimumab-atto from RP adalimumab within the previous 100 days, and were receiving adalimumab-atto at the time of the survey. Consented participants were queried on adalimumab-atto safety and effectiveness, cost, product preference, and education received for the switch. Descriptive statistics were used to depict responses.

Results: Of the 250 patients contacted, 154 participants completed the survey. Respondents (77.9%) reported no concerns with loss of disease control, potential side effects (67.9%), or cost (89.5%) after switching. About 28.7% reported a preference for adalimumab-atto, while 39.3% reported no preference between products. About 43.7% reported being satisfied/very satisfied with the education they received, while 65.1% stated they did not feel they knew enough about adalimumab-atto.

Conclusions: There was widespread satisfaction with adalimumab-atto after switching from RP adalimumab. Nevertheless, participants reported limited knowledge of adalimumab-atto, suggesting a need for enhanced education on biosimilars.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy 医学-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
96
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy (1471-2598; 1744-7682) is a MEDLINE-indexed, international journal publishing peer-reviewed research across all aspects of biological therapy. Each article is structured to incorporate the author’s own expert opinion on the impact of the topic on research and clinical practice and the scope for future development. The audience consists of scientists and managers in the healthcare and biopharmaceutical industries and others closely involved in the development and application of biological therapies for the treatment of human disease. The journal welcomes: Reviews covering therapeutic antibodies and vaccines, peptides and proteins, gene therapies and gene transfer technologies, cell-based therapies and regenerative medicine Drug evaluations reviewing the clinical data on a particular biological agent Original research papers reporting the results of clinical investigations on biological agents and biotherapeutic-based studies with a strong link to clinical practice Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Collection format and includes the following sections: Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results; Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信