Management of metastatic melanoma with combinations including PD-1 inhibitors.

IF 4 3区 医学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1080/14712598.2025.2485315
Lara Valeska Maul, Egle Ramelyte, Reinhard Dummer, Joanna Mangana
{"title":"Management of metastatic melanoma with combinations including PD-1 inhibitors.","authors":"Lara Valeska Maul, Egle Ramelyte, Reinhard Dummer, Joanna Mangana","doi":"10.1080/14712598.2025.2485315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Melanoma is among the most immunogenic malignancies. The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized the landscape of melanoma treatment. Long-term durable cancer control is possible in nearly 50% of non-resectable, metastatic melanoma patients with anti-CTLA4 and anti-PD-1 antibodies.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review provides a critical overview of the current data and future research directions on the management of metastatic melanoma with ICIs. We reviewed the efficacy and safety of combinations with PD-1 inhibitors through PubMed database research (Nov 2024-Mar 2025).</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>A decade after ipilimumab's approval, challenges remain. To cure more patients, the development of combinations is warranted. Combinations with a limited number of ipilimumab applications improve the overall survival outcome by approximately 10%, with a dramatic increase in adverse events including fatal events. Anti-LAG3/nivolumab is a promising alternative, offering similar efficacy to ipilimumab/nivolumab with better tolerability. In our opinion, ipilimumab/nivolumab combination should be the first-line therapy for high-risk patients (high LDH, brain or liver metastasis), while nivolumab/relatlimab or PD-1 monotherapy may be preferable for lower-risk cases. However, treatment decisions are increasingly complex, since most patients nowadays are pretreated in the (neo)-adjuvant setting. The key limitation today is the lack of biomarkers to guide individualized treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12084,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14712598.2025.2485315","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Melanoma is among the most immunogenic malignancies. The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized the landscape of melanoma treatment. Long-term durable cancer control is possible in nearly 50% of non-resectable, metastatic melanoma patients with anti-CTLA4 and anti-PD-1 antibodies.

Areas covered: This review provides a critical overview of the current data and future research directions on the management of metastatic melanoma with ICIs. We reviewed the efficacy and safety of combinations with PD-1 inhibitors through PubMed database research (Nov 2024-Mar 2025).

Expert opinion: A decade after ipilimumab's approval, challenges remain. To cure more patients, the development of combinations is warranted. Combinations with a limited number of ipilimumab applications improve the overall survival outcome by approximately 10%, with a dramatic increase in adverse events including fatal events. Anti-LAG3/nivolumab is a promising alternative, offering similar efficacy to ipilimumab/nivolumab with better tolerability. In our opinion, ipilimumab/nivolumab combination should be the first-line therapy for high-risk patients (high LDH, brain or liver metastasis), while nivolumab/relatlimab or PD-1 monotherapy may be preferable for lower-risk cases. However, treatment decisions are increasingly complex, since most patients nowadays are pretreated in the (neo)-adjuvant setting. The key limitation today is the lack of biomarkers to guide individualized treatment strategies.

PD-1抑制剂联合治疗转移性黑色素瘤
黑色素瘤是最具免疫原性的恶性肿瘤之一。免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)的出现彻底改变了黑色素瘤治疗的前景。近50%具有抗ctla4和抗pd -1抗体的不可切除的转移性黑色素瘤患者可以长期持久地控制癌症。涵盖领域:这篇综述提供了目前的数据和未来的研究方向的管理转移性黑色素瘤与胰岛素注射的关键概述。我们通过PubMed数据库研究(2024年11月- 2025年3月)回顾了联合PD-1抑制剂的有效性和安全性。专家意见:ipilimumab获批十年后,挑战依然存在。为了治愈更多的病人,开发联合疗法是必要的。联合有限数量的ipilimumab应用可使总体生存结果提高约10%,包括致命事件在内的不良事件显著增加。Anti-LAG3/nivolumab是一种很有前景的替代药物,具有与ipilimumab/nivolumab相似的疗效,并且耐受性更好。我们认为,易普利姆单抗/纳沃单抗联合治疗应作为高危患者(高LDH、脑或肝转移)的一线治疗,而纳沃单抗/相对单抗或PD-1单药治疗可能更适合低危患者。然而,治疗决策越来越复杂,因为现在大多数患者在(新)辅助环境中进行预处理。目前的主要限制是缺乏指导个体化治疗策略的生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy 医学-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
96
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy (1471-2598; 1744-7682) is a MEDLINE-indexed, international journal publishing peer-reviewed research across all aspects of biological therapy. Each article is structured to incorporate the author’s own expert opinion on the impact of the topic on research and clinical practice and the scope for future development. The audience consists of scientists and managers in the healthcare and biopharmaceutical industries and others closely involved in the development and application of biological therapies for the treatment of human disease. The journal welcomes: Reviews covering therapeutic antibodies and vaccines, peptides and proteins, gene therapies and gene transfer technologies, cell-based therapies and regenerative medicine Drug evaluations reviewing the clinical data on a particular biological agent Original research papers reporting the results of clinical investigations on biological agents and biotherapeutic-based studies with a strong link to clinical practice Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Collection format and includes the following sections: Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results; Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信