Intracranial stimulation for pediatric refractory epilepsy: A single institutional experience using evolving therapies.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Epilepsia Open Pub Date : 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1002/epi4.70006
Rohin Singh, Megan M J Bauman, Karimul Islam, Panagiotis Kerezoudis, Sanjeet S Grewal, Jonathon J Parker, Jamie J Van Gompel, Kai J Miller, Brian N Lundstrom, Keith Starnes
{"title":"Intracranial stimulation for pediatric refractory epilepsy: A single institutional experience using evolving therapies.","authors":"Rohin Singh, Megan M J Bauman, Karimul Islam, Panagiotis Kerezoudis, Sanjeet S Grewal, Jonathon J Parker, Jamie J Van Gompel, Kai J Miller, Brian N Lundstrom, Keith Starnes","doi":"10.1002/epi4.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Neuromodulation for pediatric refractory epilepsy (PRE) is preferred when the seizure onset zone is not amenable to surgical resection, due to multifocal onset or involvement of eloquent cortex. Given its rapidly evolving landscape, we describe our institutional experience with neurostimulation therapies including deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the anterior nucleus (DBS-ANT), the centromedian nucleus (DBS-CM), responsive neurostimulation (RNS), and chronic subthreshold stimulation (CSS) to treat PRE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was conducted to identify pediatric patients (≤18 years of age) who presented to our institution with PRE. Patients were included who had at least 1 year of follow-up after neurostimulation was started. Patients with ≥50% seizure frequency reduction at last follow-up compared to baseline were classified as responders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 35 patients (21 females) were included in the series. Nine patients underwent DBS-ANT, 9 underwent DBS-CM (+ ANT in 7 patients), 5 underwent RNS, and 12 underwent CSS. The median age at seizure onset and surgery was 8 and 16 years, respectively. Structural lesions were the most common etiology of epilepsy (54%). Eighteen patients had prior interventions and 13 received invasive EEG. Post-operative complications following neurostimulation implantation were noted in three patients (9%). However, no permanent deficits were noted. Median follow-up time was 46 months (range 13-162 months). Twenty-three patients (59%) were responders (3/9 DBS-ANT; 7/9 DBS-CM; 4/5 RNS; 9/12 CSS). Further, median seizure reduction was 25% (DBS-ANT), 89% (DBS-CM), 87% (RNS), and 88% (CSS) across the cohort. Six patients (17%) had improved subjective neurocognitive outcomes while the other 29 had stable neurocognitive outcomes.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>DBS, RNS, and CSS are safe and effective options for PRE. An understanding of treatment approaches can optimize results by tailoring therapy to individual patients.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong>This study investigates the use of various neurostimulation therapies for treating pediatric refractory epilepsy (PRE) including deep brain stimulation (DBS), responsive neurostimulation (RNS), and chronic subthreshold stimulation (CSS). Overall, neuromodulation was found to be effective in reducing seizures in most patients, with 59% of patients showing at least a 50% reduction in seizure frequency. Additionally, the treatments were generally safe, with few complications and no instances of permanent deficits.</p>","PeriodicalId":12038,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/epi4.70006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Neuromodulation for pediatric refractory epilepsy (PRE) is preferred when the seizure onset zone is not amenable to surgical resection, due to multifocal onset or involvement of eloquent cortex. Given its rapidly evolving landscape, we describe our institutional experience with neurostimulation therapies including deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the anterior nucleus (DBS-ANT), the centromedian nucleus (DBS-CM), responsive neurostimulation (RNS), and chronic subthreshold stimulation (CSS) to treat PRE.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted to identify pediatric patients (≤18 years of age) who presented to our institution with PRE. Patients were included who had at least 1 year of follow-up after neurostimulation was started. Patients with ≥50% seizure frequency reduction at last follow-up compared to baseline were classified as responders.

Results: A total of 35 patients (21 females) were included in the series. Nine patients underwent DBS-ANT, 9 underwent DBS-CM (+ ANT in 7 patients), 5 underwent RNS, and 12 underwent CSS. The median age at seizure onset and surgery was 8 and 16 years, respectively. Structural lesions were the most common etiology of epilepsy (54%). Eighteen patients had prior interventions and 13 received invasive EEG. Post-operative complications following neurostimulation implantation were noted in three patients (9%). However, no permanent deficits were noted. Median follow-up time was 46 months (range 13-162 months). Twenty-three patients (59%) were responders (3/9 DBS-ANT; 7/9 DBS-CM; 4/5 RNS; 9/12 CSS). Further, median seizure reduction was 25% (DBS-ANT), 89% (DBS-CM), 87% (RNS), and 88% (CSS) across the cohort. Six patients (17%) had improved subjective neurocognitive outcomes while the other 29 had stable neurocognitive outcomes.

Significance: DBS, RNS, and CSS are safe and effective options for PRE. An understanding of treatment approaches can optimize results by tailoring therapy to individual patients.

Plain language summary: This study investigates the use of various neurostimulation therapies for treating pediatric refractory epilepsy (PRE) including deep brain stimulation (DBS), responsive neurostimulation (RNS), and chronic subthreshold stimulation (CSS). Overall, neuromodulation was found to be effective in reducing seizures in most patients, with 59% of patients showing at least a 50% reduction in seizure frequency. Additionally, the treatments were generally safe, with few complications and no instances of permanent deficits.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epilepsia Open
Epilepsia Open Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
104
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信