Intra-breath respiratory mechanics of prematurity-associated lung disease phenotypes in school-aged children.

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
ERJ Open Research Pub Date : 2025-03-31 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1183/23120541.00840-2024
Michael Cousins, Kylie Hart, Bence Radics, A John Henderson, Zoltán Hantos, Peter D Sly, Sailesh Kotecha
{"title":"Intra-breath respiratory mechanics of prematurity-associated lung disease phenotypes in school-aged children.","authors":"Michael Cousins, Kylie Hart, Bence Radics, A John Henderson, Zoltán Hantos, Peter D Sly, Sailesh Kotecha","doi":"10.1183/23120541.00840-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intra-breath oscillometry potentially offers detailed information regarding airway function, with increasing magnitude of difference between resistance and reactance at end-expiration to end-inspiration potentially associated with obstructive airway disease, but less is known about specific respiratory mechanics in preterm-born children using this methodology. We investigated whether different spirometry phenotypes of prematurity-associated lung disease (PLD) have specific intra-breath oscillometry features.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>167 school-aged (7-12 years) children, 14 with prematurity-associated obstructive lung disease (POLD; forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV<sub>1</sub>) <lower limit of normal (LLN), FEV<sub>1</sub>/forced vital capacity (FVC) <LLN), 11 with prematurity-associated preserved ratio impaired spirometry (pPRISm; FEV<sub>1</sub> <LLN, FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC ≥LLN), 90 preterm controls (FEV<sub>1</sub> ≥LLN) and 52 term controls, performed intra-breath oscillometry at baseline, following maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing and following post-exercise bronchodilation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Children with POLD showed greater resistance and more negative reactance throughout the respiratory cycle, including at zero-flow states of end-expiration and end-inspiration. The difference between end-expiration and end-inspiration did not show differences between groups until corrected for tidal volume, whereby children with POLD and pPRISm both demonstrated approximately two-fold greater difference compared to both preterm and term controls for resistance (2.24 and 2.22 <i>versus</i> 1.28 and 1.11 hPa·s·L<sup>-1</sup>, respectively), and in particular a greater magnitude of difference for reactance for children with POLD <i>versus</i> preterm and term controls only (-1.58 <i>versus</i> -0.26 and 0.03 hPa·s·L<sup>-1</sup>, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intra-breath respiratory mechanics for preterm-born children with an obstructive lung phenotype have greater impedance throughout the respiratory cycle, features different to those observed in children with other wheeze phenotypes including preschool wheeze and asthma.</p>","PeriodicalId":11739,"journal":{"name":"ERJ Open Research","volume":"11 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11955913/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERJ Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00840-2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intra-breath oscillometry potentially offers detailed information regarding airway function, with increasing magnitude of difference between resistance and reactance at end-expiration to end-inspiration potentially associated with obstructive airway disease, but less is known about specific respiratory mechanics in preterm-born children using this methodology. We investigated whether different spirometry phenotypes of prematurity-associated lung disease (PLD) have specific intra-breath oscillometry features.

Methods: 167 school-aged (7-12 years) children, 14 with prematurity-associated obstructive lung disease (POLD; forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) 1/forced vital capacity (FVC) 1 1/FVC ≥LLN), 90 preterm controls (FEV1 ≥LLN) and 52 term controls, performed intra-breath oscillometry at baseline, following maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing and following post-exercise bronchodilation.

Results: Children with POLD showed greater resistance and more negative reactance throughout the respiratory cycle, including at zero-flow states of end-expiration and end-inspiration. The difference between end-expiration and end-inspiration did not show differences between groups until corrected for tidal volume, whereby children with POLD and pPRISm both demonstrated approximately two-fold greater difference compared to both preterm and term controls for resistance (2.24 and 2.22 versus 1.28 and 1.11 hPa·s·L-1, respectively), and in particular a greater magnitude of difference for reactance for children with POLD versus preterm and term controls only (-1.58 versus -0.26 and 0.03 hPa·s·L-1, respectively).

Conclusions: Intra-breath respiratory mechanics for preterm-born children with an obstructive lung phenotype have greater impedance throughout the respiratory cycle, features different to those observed in children with other wheeze phenotypes including preschool wheeze and asthma.

学龄儿童过早相关肺部疾病表型的呼吸力学
背景:呼吸内振荡测量法可能提供有关气道功能的详细信息,呼气末至吸气末阻力和电抗之间的差异越来越大,可能与阻塞性气道疾病有关,但使用这种方法对早产儿的特定呼吸力学知之甚少。我们研究了早产相关肺病(PLD)的不同肺活量测定表型是否具有特定的呼吸内振荡特征。方法:167名学龄(7-12岁)儿童,其中14名患有早产相关阻塞性肺疾病(POLD;1秒用力呼气量(FEV1) 1/用力肺活量(FVC) 1/FVC≥LLN), 90例早产儿对照组(FEV1≥LLN)和52例足月对照组在基线、最大心肺运动试验和运动后支气管扩张后进行呼吸内振荡测量。结果:pod患儿在整个呼吸循环中表现出更大的阻力和更多的负抗,包括在呼气末和吸气末的零流状态。在校正潮气量之前,两组之间的差异并没有显示出差异,因此,与早产儿和足月对照组相比,pod和pPRISm患儿在阻力方面的差异均约为两倍(分别为2.24和2.22与1.28和1.11 hPa·s·L-1)。特别是与早产儿和足月对照组相比,pod儿童的电抗差异更大(分别为-1.58、-0.26和0.03 hPa·s·L-1)。结论:阻塞性肺表型早产儿的呼吸力学在整个呼吸周期中具有更大的阻抗,其特征不同于其他喘息表型的儿童,包括学龄前喘息和哮喘。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ERJ Open Research
ERJ Open Research Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
273
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: ERJ Open Research is a fully open access original research journal, published online by the European Respiratory Society. The journal aims to publish high-quality work in all fields of respiratory science and medicine, covering basic science, clinical translational science and clinical medicine. The journal was created to help fulfil the ERS objective to disseminate scientific and educational material to its members and to the medical community, but also to provide researchers with an affordable open access specialty journal in which to publish their work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信