Combined symptoms of diabetes distress, depression, and anxiety and their association with glycemic control in primary care patients with type 2 diabetes in Egypt.
Hazem A Sayed Ahmed, Samar F Mohamed, Anwar I Joudeh, Sally Fawzy Elotla, Mona Mostafa, Jaffer Shah, Ahmed Mahmoud Fouad, Samy Abdelrazek Abdelazim
{"title":"Combined symptoms of diabetes distress, depression, and anxiety and their association with glycemic control in primary care patients with type 2 diabetes in Egypt.","authors":"Hazem A Sayed Ahmed, Samar F Mohamed, Anwar I Joudeh, Sally Fawzy Elotla, Mona Mostafa, Jaffer Shah, Ahmed Mahmoud Fouad, Samy Abdelrazek Abdelazim","doi":"10.1007/s13340-025-00793-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Existing studies mostly focus on the separate impacts of diabetes distress, depression, and anxiety on glycemic control, leaving a gap in understanding their combined influence within primary care settings. This study aims to explore this interaction among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in Egyptian primary healthcare.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted in rural primary healthcare settings in Egypt from September 2020 to June 2021, included 354 patients with T2DM. Sociodemographic, lifestyle, and clinical characteristics were assessed through patient interviews. Diabetes distress was measured using the 5-item Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale (PAID-5 scale), and symptoms of depression and anxiety were evaluated using the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 Scale (GAD-7), respectively. Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) measurements indicated glycemic control.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants experienced varying mental health symptoms: 24.9% had one symptom, 8.2% had two, and 4.5% had all three (diabetes distress, depression, and anxiety symptoms). In multiple linear regression, not working status (β = -0.203, p = 0.015), dyslipidemia (β = 0.258, p = 0.021), increased BMI (β = 0.022, p < 0.001), and more mental health symptoms (β = 0.267, p < 0.001) predicted higher HbA1c levels. Ordinal regression found that higher educational levels (OR = 2.385, p = 0.021), sufficient income (OR = 2.360, p = 0.007), and higher HbA1c (OR = 3.103, p < 0.001) predicted more mental health symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mental health symptoms were common, and there were reciprocal associations between elevated HbA1c levels and increased mental health symptoms.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13340-025-00793-2.</p>","PeriodicalId":11340,"journal":{"name":"Diabetology International","volume":"16 2","pages":"326-338"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11954776/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetology International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13340-025-00793-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Existing studies mostly focus on the separate impacts of diabetes distress, depression, and anxiety on glycemic control, leaving a gap in understanding their combined influence within primary care settings. This study aims to explore this interaction among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in Egyptian primary healthcare.
Methods: The study was conducted in rural primary healthcare settings in Egypt from September 2020 to June 2021, included 354 patients with T2DM. Sociodemographic, lifestyle, and clinical characteristics were assessed through patient interviews. Diabetes distress was measured using the 5-item Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale (PAID-5 scale), and symptoms of depression and anxiety were evaluated using the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 Scale (GAD-7), respectively. Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) measurements indicated glycemic control.
Results: Participants experienced varying mental health symptoms: 24.9% had one symptom, 8.2% had two, and 4.5% had all three (diabetes distress, depression, and anxiety symptoms). In multiple linear regression, not working status (β = -0.203, p = 0.015), dyslipidemia (β = 0.258, p = 0.021), increased BMI (β = 0.022, p < 0.001), and more mental health symptoms (β = 0.267, p < 0.001) predicted higher HbA1c levels. Ordinal regression found that higher educational levels (OR = 2.385, p = 0.021), sufficient income (OR = 2.360, p = 0.007), and higher HbA1c (OR = 3.103, p < 0.001) predicted more mental health symptoms.
Conclusion: Mental health symptoms were common, and there were reciprocal associations between elevated HbA1c levels and increased mental health symptoms.
Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13340-025-00793-2.
期刊介绍:
Diabetology International, the official journal of the Japan Diabetes Society, publishes original research articles about experimental research and clinical studies in diabetes and related areas. The journal also presents editorials, reviews, commentaries, reports of expert committees, and case reports on any aspect of diabetes. Diabetology International welcomes submissions from researchers, clinicians, and health professionals throughout the world who are interested in research, treatment, and care of patients with diabetes. All manuscripts are peer-reviewed to assure that high-quality information in the field of diabetes is made available to readers. Manuscripts are reviewed with due respect for the author''s confidentiality. At the same time, reviewers also have rights to confidentiality, which are respected by the editors. The journal follows a single-blind review procedure, where the reviewers are aware of the names and affiliations of the authors, but the reviewer reports provided to authors are anonymous. Single-blind peer review is the traditional model of peer review that many reviewers are comfortable with, and it facilitates a dispassionate critique of a manuscript.