Using the Modified Minnesota Detoxification Scale to Evaluate Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome: An Integrative Review.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Torri Trojand, Jaclynn Morgan, Charles J Shamoun
{"title":"Using the Modified Minnesota Detoxification Scale to Evaluate Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome: An Integrative Review.","authors":"Torri Trojand, Jaclynn Morgan, Charles J Shamoun","doi":"10.4037/ccn2025568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Alcohol use disorder in the United States is increasing. Alcohol is the second most commonly abused drug worldwide, resulting in acute hospitalizations related to alcohol use and alcohol withdrawal syndrome. Management of alcohol withdrawal syndrome relies on screening tools to determine the need for treatment. The most commonly used tool is the Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol Scale-Revised (CIWA-Ar), which has not been validated for use in critical care units.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether the modified Minnesota Detoxification Scale (mMINDS) is more effective than the CIWA-Ar for evaluating acute withdrawal symptoms in patients in intensive care units.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This integrative review used the framework of Whittemore and Knafl. The literature was searched for studies related to mMINDS, neurocritical care, and critical care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine articles were included in the review. The review revealed 3 outcomes: nurses preferred the mMINDS over the CIWA-Ar, assessments with the mMINDS tool was more accurate for patients with CIWA-Ar scores greater than 10, and patient outcomes were improved with use of the mMINDS. The mMINDS is preferred over the CIWA-Ar for managing alcohol withdrawal syndrome in patients in intensive care units because it is associated with shorter stays, less benzodiazepine use, and a decrease in delirium tremens.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings regarding mMINDS can apply to both critical care and non-critical care settings. The mMINDS is preferred by nurses and results in more positive patient outcomes. The mMINDS is effective and should be used in critical care areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":10738,"journal":{"name":"Critical care nurse","volume":"45 2","pages":"60-68"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care nurse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4037/ccn2025568","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Alcohol use disorder in the United States is increasing. Alcohol is the second most commonly abused drug worldwide, resulting in acute hospitalizations related to alcohol use and alcohol withdrawal syndrome. Management of alcohol withdrawal syndrome relies on screening tools to determine the need for treatment. The most commonly used tool is the Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol Scale-Revised (CIWA-Ar), which has not been validated for use in critical care units.

Objective: To evaluate whether the modified Minnesota Detoxification Scale (mMINDS) is more effective than the CIWA-Ar for evaluating acute withdrawal symptoms in patients in intensive care units.

Methods: This integrative review used the framework of Whittemore and Knafl. The literature was searched for studies related to mMINDS, neurocritical care, and critical care.

Results: Nine articles were included in the review. The review revealed 3 outcomes: nurses preferred the mMINDS over the CIWA-Ar, assessments with the mMINDS tool was more accurate for patients with CIWA-Ar scores greater than 10, and patient outcomes were improved with use of the mMINDS. The mMINDS is preferred over the CIWA-Ar for managing alcohol withdrawal syndrome in patients in intensive care units because it is associated with shorter stays, less benzodiazepine use, and a decrease in delirium tremens.

Conclusion: The findings regarding mMINDS can apply to both critical care and non-critical care settings. The mMINDS is preferred by nurses and results in more positive patient outcomes. The mMINDS is effective and should be used in critical care areas.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical care nurse
Critical care nurse 医学-护理
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Critical Care Nurse (CCN) is an official publication of the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses (AACN). Authors are invited to submit manuscripts for consideration and peer review. Clinical topics must meet the mission of CCN and address nursing practice of acute and critically ill patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信