Complication, Readmission, Intensive Care Unit Admission, and Revision Incidence Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Surgery in End-stage Renal Disease and Renal Transplant Patients.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Spencer Smith, Mackenzie Kelly, Won Hyung A Ryu, Jonathan Kark, Josiah Orina, Travis Philipp, Jung Yoo
{"title":"Complication, Readmission, Intensive Care Unit Admission, and Revision Incidence Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Surgery in End-stage Renal Disease and Renal Transplant Patients.","authors":"Spencer Smith, Mackenzie Kelly, Won Hyung A Ryu, Jonathan Kark, Josiah Orina, Travis Philipp, Jung Yoo","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cross-sectional study aimed to investigate the postoperative outcomes following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and renal transplant recipients, using data from a large national database. Three patient groups were analyzed: control group, ESRD group, and renal transplant group.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the postoperative outcomes following ACDF surgery in patients with ESRD and renal transplant recipients, utilizing data from a large national database.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with ESRD and renal transplant recipients face unique health challenges, and there is a paucity of comprehensive research examining their postoperative surgical experiences, especially in the context of spine surgery.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Data from 158,101 ACDF procedures performed between 2016 and 2019 were analyzed. Patients were stratified into 3 groups: control, end-stage renal failure, and renal transplant. The primary outcomes included 30-day medical complications, 30-day intensive care unit admissions, 90-day readmissions, and 1-year revision surgery. Multivariable logistic regression was employed for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with ESRD had significantly higher rates of 30-day medical complications (56%) and 90-day readmissions (38%) compared with the control patients (3% and 3%, respectively). Renal transplant patients also showed elevated rates of medical complications and readmissions, 12% and 10%, respectively, but lower than patients with ESRD. Patients with ESRD had significantly higher odds of intensive care unit admission. There were no significant differences in revision rates among the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with ESRD and renal transplant recipients undergoing ACDF surgery face increased risks of medical complications and readmissions, with patients with ESRD showing surprisingly high rates. Tailored care strategies and close monitoring are crucial for these patient cohorts, emphasizing the need for specialized postoperative care. The study's findings highlight the multifaceted nature of surgical outcomes in medically complex populations and the importance of holistic assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":10457,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001785","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective cross-sectional study aimed to investigate the postoperative outcomes following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and renal transplant recipients, using data from a large national database. Three patient groups were analyzed: control group, ESRD group, and renal transplant group.

Objective: To investigate the postoperative outcomes following ACDF surgery in patients with ESRD and renal transplant recipients, utilizing data from a large national database.

Background: Patients with ESRD and renal transplant recipients face unique health challenges, and there is a paucity of comprehensive research examining their postoperative surgical experiences, especially in the context of spine surgery.

Materials and methods: Data from 158,101 ACDF procedures performed between 2016 and 2019 were analyzed. Patients were stratified into 3 groups: control, end-stage renal failure, and renal transplant. The primary outcomes included 30-day medical complications, 30-day intensive care unit admissions, 90-day readmissions, and 1-year revision surgery. Multivariable logistic regression was employed for analysis.

Results: Patients with ESRD had significantly higher rates of 30-day medical complications (56%) and 90-day readmissions (38%) compared with the control patients (3% and 3%, respectively). Renal transplant patients also showed elevated rates of medical complications and readmissions, 12% and 10%, respectively, but lower than patients with ESRD. Patients with ESRD had significantly higher odds of intensive care unit admission. There were no significant differences in revision rates among the groups.

Conclusions: Patients with ESRD and renal transplant recipients undergoing ACDF surgery face increased risks of medical complications and readmissions, with patients with ESRD showing surprisingly high rates. Tailored care strategies and close monitoring are crucial for these patient cohorts, emphasizing the need for specialized postoperative care. The study's findings highlight the multifaceted nature of surgical outcomes in medically complex populations and the importance of holistic assessment.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Spine Surgery
Clinical Spine Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
236
期刊介绍: Clinical Spine Surgery is the ideal journal for the busy practicing spine surgeon or trainee, as it is the only journal necessary to keep up to date with new clinical research and surgical techniques. Readers get to watch leaders in the field debate controversial topics in a new controversies section, and gain access to evidence-based reviews of important pathologies in the systematic reviews section. The journal features a surgical technique complete with a video, and a tips and tricks section that allows surgeons to review the important steps prior to a complex procedure. Clinical Spine Surgery provides readers with primary research studies, specifically level 1, 2 and 3 studies, ensuring that articles that may actually change a surgeon’s practice will be read and published. Each issue includes a brief article that will help a surgeon better understand the business of healthcare, as well as an article that will help a surgeon understand how to interpret increasingly complex research methodology. Clinical Spine Surgery is your single source for up-to-date, evidence-based recommendations for spine care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信