Association among the number of natural teeth, dental maintenance visits and diabetes status: a cross-sectional study using employment-based healthcare claims database.
{"title":"Association among the number of natural teeth, dental maintenance visits and diabetes status: a cross-sectional study using employment-based healthcare claims database.","authors":"Miki Ishikawa, Takako Yasuda, Natsuki Nara, Itsuko Miyazawa, Naoko Takase, Kayo Harada, Atsushi Ishikado, Katsutaro Morino","doi":"10.1007/s13340-025-00805-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Although diabetes is associated with the risk of tooth loss, there are no large-scale studies examining the reality and the effectiveness of dental maintenance visits in preventing tooth loss. We aimed to investigate the associations among the number of teeth, dental maintenance visits and diabetic status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a cross-sectional study: a database comprising employment-based health insurance claim and medical check-up data between April 2015 and March 2016. From the dental receipts for a total of 705,542 individuals aged 20-74 years, we calculated dental visits ratio. After excluding missing data on the number of teeth and HbA1c, the association between dental maintenance visits and the number of teeth was further examined in 185,820 individuals aged 40-69 years visited a dentist by diabetes status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The percentage of dental visits was 46% overall, particularly low among younger subjects (34% in 20 s, 43% in 30 s), and increased with age. The maintenance-included group had a higher number of teeth than the treatment-only group, even at older ages, and this association was observed regardless of diabetes or glycemic control status. Furthermore, even with diabetes, the number of teeth in the group with good glycemic control was like that of non-diabetic.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dental visits ratio was particularly low among younger subjects and those who receive dental maintenance had a higher number of teeth, regardless of diabetes or not. Adequate glycemic control and dental maintenance were associated with the number of teeth in the people with diabetes. The results suggest that it is important for physicians to work closely with dentists to promote patient-centered care and encourage both maintenance visits and better glycemic control.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13340-025-00805-1.</p>","PeriodicalId":11340,"journal":{"name":"Diabetology International","volume":"16 2","pages":"403-413"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11954757/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetology International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13340-025-00805-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: Although diabetes is associated with the risk of tooth loss, there are no large-scale studies examining the reality and the effectiveness of dental maintenance visits in preventing tooth loss. We aimed to investigate the associations among the number of teeth, dental maintenance visits and diabetic status.
Methods: This is a cross-sectional study: a database comprising employment-based health insurance claim and medical check-up data between April 2015 and March 2016. From the dental receipts for a total of 705,542 individuals aged 20-74 years, we calculated dental visits ratio. After excluding missing data on the number of teeth and HbA1c, the association between dental maintenance visits and the number of teeth was further examined in 185,820 individuals aged 40-69 years visited a dentist by diabetes status.
Results: The percentage of dental visits was 46% overall, particularly low among younger subjects (34% in 20 s, 43% in 30 s), and increased with age. The maintenance-included group had a higher number of teeth than the treatment-only group, even at older ages, and this association was observed regardless of diabetes or glycemic control status. Furthermore, even with diabetes, the number of teeth in the group with good glycemic control was like that of non-diabetic.
Conclusion: Dental visits ratio was particularly low among younger subjects and those who receive dental maintenance had a higher number of teeth, regardless of diabetes or not. Adequate glycemic control and dental maintenance were associated with the number of teeth in the people with diabetes. The results suggest that it is important for physicians to work closely with dentists to promote patient-centered care and encourage both maintenance visits and better glycemic control.
Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13340-025-00805-1.
期刊介绍:
Diabetology International, the official journal of the Japan Diabetes Society, publishes original research articles about experimental research and clinical studies in diabetes and related areas. The journal also presents editorials, reviews, commentaries, reports of expert committees, and case reports on any aspect of diabetes. Diabetology International welcomes submissions from researchers, clinicians, and health professionals throughout the world who are interested in research, treatment, and care of patients with diabetes. All manuscripts are peer-reviewed to assure that high-quality information in the field of diabetes is made available to readers. Manuscripts are reviewed with due respect for the author''s confidentiality. At the same time, reviewers also have rights to confidentiality, which are respected by the editors. The journal follows a single-blind review procedure, where the reviewers are aware of the names and affiliations of the authors, but the reviewer reports provided to authors are anonymous. Single-blind peer review is the traditional model of peer review that many reviewers are comfortable with, and it facilitates a dispassionate critique of a manuscript.