Jonas Munk Jensen , Karina Vejrum Sørensen , Henrik Støvring , Anette Andersen
{"title":"LIVING - protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of three different levels of diabetes self-management programs","authors":"Jonas Munk Jensen , Karina Vejrum Sørensen , Henrik Støvring , Anette Andersen","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2025.107891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In Denmark, Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) care includes diabetes self-management programs (DSMPs) delivered by municipalities. Following a successful pilot study, a DSMP was expanded to include a digital platform and flexible educational materials. While exercise therapy is recognized as essential in T2D management, high-quality studies on DSMPs incorporating exercise are limited. This trial assesses the (cost)effectiveness of three interventions with escalating intensity, hypothesizing that higher intensity enhances diabetes management competence and reduces complication risk.</div></div><div><h3>Methods/design</h3><div>A pragmatic randomized controlled trial will assess three different DSMP interventions in six Danish municipalities acting as trial sites. Each site will implement one of three versions of Lev Livet: a short version (SLL), a full version (FLL), or the full version with high intensity exercise (FLL + H). At each site, 48 participants will be randomly assigned (2:1) to intervention or control groups. Primary outcome is perceived competence in diabetes (questionnaire). Other outcomes measure physical activity level (accelerometer),HbA1c, disease progression, physical function, and self-reported metrics. The trial is approved by the Danish National Center for Ethics (case no 1–10–72-107-23) and registered at <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> (<span><span>NCT06091501</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>).</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>The LIVING trial has the potential to establish whether the Lev Livet program is effective and cost effective and how it can be implemented in municipalities. By analyzing dose-response relationships, the trial may refine intervention frequency and intensity, improve diabetes management, and inform both national and international guidelines for accessible, effective diabetes care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":"153 ","pages":"Article 107891"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551714425000850","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
In Denmark, Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) care includes diabetes self-management programs (DSMPs) delivered by municipalities. Following a successful pilot study, a DSMP was expanded to include a digital platform and flexible educational materials. While exercise therapy is recognized as essential in T2D management, high-quality studies on DSMPs incorporating exercise are limited. This trial assesses the (cost)effectiveness of three interventions with escalating intensity, hypothesizing that higher intensity enhances diabetes management competence and reduces complication risk.
Methods/design
A pragmatic randomized controlled trial will assess three different DSMP interventions in six Danish municipalities acting as trial sites. Each site will implement one of three versions of Lev Livet: a short version (SLL), a full version (FLL), or the full version with high intensity exercise (FLL + H). At each site, 48 participants will be randomly assigned (2:1) to intervention or control groups. Primary outcome is perceived competence in diabetes (questionnaire). Other outcomes measure physical activity level (accelerometer),HbA1c, disease progression, physical function, and self-reported metrics. The trial is approved by the Danish National Center for Ethics (case no 1–10–72-107-23) and registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06091501).
Discussion
The LIVING trial has the potential to establish whether the Lev Livet program is effective and cost effective and how it can be implemented in municipalities. By analyzing dose-response relationships, the trial may refine intervention frequency and intensity, improve diabetes management, and inform both national and international guidelines for accessible, effective diabetes care.
期刊介绍:
Contemporary Clinical Trials is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes manuscripts pertaining to all aspects of clinical trials, including, but not limited to, design, conduct, analysis, regulation and ethics. Manuscripts submitted should appeal to a readership drawn from disciplines including medicine, biostatistics, epidemiology, computer science, management science, behavioural science, pharmaceutical science, and bioethics. Full-length papers and short communications not exceeding 1,500 words, as well as systemic reviews of clinical trials and methodologies will be published. Perspectives/commentaries on current issues and the impact of clinical trials on the practice of medicine and health policy are also welcome.