LIVING - protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of three different levels of diabetes self-management programs

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Jonas Munk Jensen , Karina Vejrum Sørensen , Henrik Støvring , Anette Andersen
{"title":"LIVING - protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of three different levels of diabetes self-management programs","authors":"Jonas Munk Jensen ,&nbsp;Karina Vejrum Sørensen ,&nbsp;Henrik Støvring ,&nbsp;Anette Andersen","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2025.107891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In Denmark, Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) care includes diabetes self-management programs (DSMPs) delivered by municipalities. Following a successful pilot study, a DSMP was expanded to include a digital platform and flexible educational materials. While exercise therapy is recognized as essential in T2D management, high-quality studies on DSMPs incorporating exercise are limited. This trial assesses the (cost)effectiveness of three interventions with escalating intensity, hypothesizing that higher intensity enhances diabetes management competence and reduces complication risk.</div></div><div><h3>Methods/design</h3><div>A pragmatic randomized controlled trial will assess three different DSMP interventions in six Danish municipalities acting as trial sites. Each site will implement one of three versions of Lev Livet: a short version (SLL), a full version (FLL), or the full version with high intensity exercise (FLL + H). At each site, 48 participants will be randomly assigned (2:1) to intervention or control groups. Primary outcome is perceived competence in diabetes (questionnaire). Other outcomes measure physical activity level (accelerometer),HbA1c, disease progression, physical function, and self-reported metrics. The trial is approved by the Danish National Center for Ethics (case no 1–10–72-107-23) and registered at <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> (<span><span>NCT06091501</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>).</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>The LIVING trial has the potential to establish whether the Lev Livet program is effective and cost effective and how it can be implemented in municipalities. By analyzing dose-response relationships, the trial may refine intervention frequency and intensity, improve diabetes management, and inform both national and international guidelines for accessible, effective diabetes care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":"153 ","pages":"Article 107891"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551714425000850","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

In Denmark, Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) care includes diabetes self-management programs (DSMPs) delivered by municipalities. Following a successful pilot study, a DSMP was expanded to include a digital platform and flexible educational materials. While exercise therapy is recognized as essential in T2D management, high-quality studies on DSMPs incorporating exercise are limited. This trial assesses the (cost)effectiveness of three interventions with escalating intensity, hypothesizing that higher intensity enhances diabetes management competence and reduces complication risk.

Methods/design

A pragmatic randomized controlled trial will assess three different DSMP interventions in six Danish municipalities acting as trial sites. Each site will implement one of three versions of Lev Livet: a short version (SLL), a full version (FLL), or the full version with high intensity exercise (FLL + H). At each site, 48 participants will be randomly assigned (2:1) to intervention or control groups. Primary outcome is perceived competence in diabetes (questionnaire). Other outcomes measure physical activity level (accelerometer),HbA1c, disease progression, physical function, and self-reported metrics. The trial is approved by the Danish National Center for Ethics (case no 1–10–72-107-23) and registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06091501).

Discussion

The LIVING trial has the potential to establish whether the Lev Livet program is effective and cost effective and how it can be implemented in municipalities. By analyzing dose-response relationships, the trial may refine intervention frequency and intensity, improve diabetes management, and inform both national and international guidelines for accessible, effective diabetes care.
一项实用的随机对照试验研究了三种不同水平的糖尿病自我管理方案的效果。
背景:在丹麦,2型糖尿病(T2D)护理包括由市政当局提供的糖尿病自我管理计划(DSMPs)。在成功的试点研究之后,DSMP扩展到包括数字平台和灵活的教育材料。虽然运动疗法在T2D治疗中被认为是必不可少的,但结合运动的DSMPs的高质量研究是有限的。本试验评估了三种强度递增的干预措施的(成本)效果,假设更高的强度可以增强糖尿病管理能力并降低并发症风险。方法/设计:一项实用的随机对照试验将在六个丹麦城市作为试验地点评估三种不同的DSMP干预措施。每个网站将实施三种版本中的一种:简短版本(sllslll),完整版本(FLL),或高强度锻炼的完整版本(FLL + H)。在每个地点,48名参与者将被随机分配到干预组或对照组(2:1)。主要结局是糖尿病的感知能力(问卷)。其他结果包括身体活动水平(加速度计)、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、疾病进展、身体功能和自我报告指标。该试验已获得丹麦国家伦理中心批准(病例号:1-10-72-107-23),并已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(NCT06091501)。讨论:LIVING试验有可能确定Lev Livet项目是否有效和成本效益,以及如何在市政当局实施。通过分析剂量-反应关系,该试验可以改进干预频率和强度,改善糖尿病管理,并为可获得、有效的糖尿病护理提供国家和国际指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
281
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Contemporary Clinical Trials is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes manuscripts pertaining to all aspects of clinical trials, including, but not limited to, design, conduct, analysis, regulation and ethics. Manuscripts submitted should appeal to a readership drawn from disciplines including medicine, biostatistics, epidemiology, computer science, management science, behavioural science, pharmaceutical science, and bioethics. Full-length papers and short communications not exceeding 1,500 words, as well as systemic reviews of clinical trials and methodologies will be published. Perspectives/commentaries on current issues and the impact of clinical trials on the practice of medicine and health policy are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信