optRF: Optimising random forest stability by determining the optimal number of trees.

IF 2.9 3区 生物学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Thomas M Lange, Mehmet Gültas, Armin O Schmitt, Felix Heinrich
{"title":"optRF: Optimising random forest stability by determining the optimal number of trees.","authors":"Thomas M Lange, Mehmet Gültas, Armin O Schmitt, Felix Heinrich","doi":"10.1186/s12859-025-06097-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Machine learning is frequently used to make decisions based on big data. Among these techniques, random forest is particularly prominent. Although random forest is known to have many advantages, one aspect that is often overseen is that it is a non-deterministic method that can produce different models using the same input data. This can have severe consequences on decision-making processes. In this study, we introduce a method to quantify the impact of non-determinism on predictions, variable importance estimates, and decisions based on the predictions or variable importance estimates. Our findings demonstrate that increasing the number of trees in random forests enhances the stability in a non-linear way while computation time increases linearly. Consequently, we conclude that there exists an optimal number of trees for any given data set that maximises the stability without unnecessarily increasing the computation time. Based on these findings, we have developed the R package optRF which models the relationship between the number of trees and the stability of random forest, providing recommendations for the optimal number of trees for any given data set.</p>","PeriodicalId":8958,"journal":{"name":"BMC Bioinformatics","volume":"26 1","pages":"95"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11959736/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Bioinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-025-06097-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Machine learning is frequently used to make decisions based on big data. Among these techniques, random forest is particularly prominent. Although random forest is known to have many advantages, one aspect that is often overseen is that it is a non-deterministic method that can produce different models using the same input data. This can have severe consequences on decision-making processes. In this study, we introduce a method to quantify the impact of non-determinism on predictions, variable importance estimates, and decisions based on the predictions or variable importance estimates. Our findings demonstrate that increasing the number of trees in random forests enhances the stability in a non-linear way while computation time increases linearly. Consequently, we conclude that there exists an optimal number of trees for any given data set that maximises the stability without unnecessarily increasing the computation time. Based on these findings, we have developed the R package optRF which models the relationship between the number of trees and the stability of random forest, providing recommendations for the optimal number of trees for any given data set.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Bioinformatics
BMC Bioinformatics 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
506
审稿时长
4.3 months
期刊介绍: BMC Bioinformatics is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the development, testing and novel application of computational and statistical methods for the modeling and analysis of all kinds of biological data, as well as other areas of computational biology. BMC Bioinformatics is part of the BMC series which publishes subject-specific journals focused on the needs of individual research communities across all areas of biology and medicine. We offer an efficient, fair and friendly peer review service, and are committed to publishing all sound science, provided that there is some advance in knowledge presented by the work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信