Improving transitions in care for children and youth with mental health concerns: implementation and evaluation of an emergency department mental health clinical pathway.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Alexandra Tucci, Paula Cloutier, Christine Polihronis, Allison Kennedy, Roger Zemek, Clare Gray, Sarah Reid, Kathleen Pajer, William Gardner, Nicholas Barrowman, Mario Cappelli, Mona Jabbour
{"title":"Improving transitions in care for children and youth with mental health concerns: implementation and evaluation of an emergency department mental health clinical pathway.","authors":"Alexandra Tucci, Paula Cloutier, Christine Polihronis, Allison Kennedy, Roger Zemek, Clare Gray, Sarah Reid, Kathleen Pajer, William Gardner, Nicholas Barrowman, Mario Cappelli, Mona Jabbour","doi":"10.1186/s12913-025-12524-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergency departments (EDs) are often the first access point for children and youth seeking mental health (MH) and addiction care. However, many EDs are unprepared to manage large volumes of pediatric MH patients. In addition, the fragmented Canadian MH system is challenged in connecting youth seen in the ED for follow-up community services. A provincial Emergency Department Mental Health Clinical Pathway (EDMHCP) for children and youth presenting to the ED with MH concerns was developed to address these challenges. The objective of the current study was to determine if EDMHCP implementation resulted in: (1) pathway use, (2) more patients discharged with MH recommendations, (3) MH service recommendations that aligned with patients' risk assessments, and (4) changes in service outcomes, including ED length of stay (LOS), revisits, and admissions/transfers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We implemented the pathway at four ED sites from 2018 to 2019 using the Theoretical Domains Framework to develop a tailored strategy at each site. We conducted chart reviews retrospectively in 2017-2018 (pre-implementation) and prospectively in 2019-2020 (post-implementation). Non-parametric tests examined differences in service outcomes between the implementation periods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pathway use varied widely across sites, ranging from 3.1% at site 4 to 83.0% at the lead site (site 2). More referrals to community MH agencies (p <.001) were made at discharge during post-implementation at the lead site compared to pre-implementation, and mixed results were obtained regarding whether clinicians' risk assessments aligned with MH service recommendations. LOS significantly increased at the lead site (p <.001) and non-lead sites (sites 1, 3, 4; p =.02) between pre- and post-implementation. Revisits and admissions/transfers did not change significantly at any site.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementation was partially successful at the lead site, showing high pathway use and greater referrals to community MH agencies. These findings emphasize the complexity of implementing pathways in various ED settings. Successful implementation requires integration into existing workflows.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02590302). Registered on 29 October 2015.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"475"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11956442/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12524-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Emergency departments (EDs) are often the first access point for children and youth seeking mental health (MH) and addiction care. However, many EDs are unprepared to manage large volumes of pediatric MH patients. In addition, the fragmented Canadian MH system is challenged in connecting youth seen in the ED for follow-up community services. A provincial Emergency Department Mental Health Clinical Pathway (EDMHCP) for children and youth presenting to the ED with MH concerns was developed to address these challenges. The objective of the current study was to determine if EDMHCP implementation resulted in: (1) pathway use, (2) more patients discharged with MH recommendations, (3) MH service recommendations that aligned with patients' risk assessments, and (4) changes in service outcomes, including ED length of stay (LOS), revisits, and admissions/transfers.

Methods: We implemented the pathway at four ED sites from 2018 to 2019 using the Theoretical Domains Framework to develop a tailored strategy at each site. We conducted chart reviews retrospectively in 2017-2018 (pre-implementation) and prospectively in 2019-2020 (post-implementation). Non-parametric tests examined differences in service outcomes between the implementation periods.

Results: Pathway use varied widely across sites, ranging from 3.1% at site 4 to 83.0% at the lead site (site 2). More referrals to community MH agencies (p <.001) were made at discharge during post-implementation at the lead site compared to pre-implementation, and mixed results were obtained regarding whether clinicians' risk assessments aligned with MH service recommendations. LOS significantly increased at the lead site (p <.001) and non-lead sites (sites 1, 3, 4; p =.02) between pre- and post-implementation. Revisits and admissions/transfers did not change significantly at any site.

Conclusion: Implementation was partially successful at the lead site, showing high pathway use and greater referrals to community MH agencies. These findings emphasize the complexity of implementing pathways in various ED settings. Successful implementation requires integration into existing workflows.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02590302). Registered on 29 October 2015.

背景:急诊科(ED)通常是儿童和青少年寻求心理健康(MH)和成瘾治疗的第一站。然而,许多急诊室都没有做好准备来管理大量的儿童精神健康患者。此外,分散的加拿大心理健康系统在为急诊室就诊的青少年提供后续社区服务方面也面临挑战。为了应对这些挑战,加拿大制定了一项省级急诊科心理健康临床路径(EDMHCP),用于处理因心理健康问题而到急诊科就诊的儿童和青少年。本研究的目的是确定 EDMHCP 的实施是否会带来以下结果:(1)路径的使用,(2)更多的患者根据心理健康建议出院,(3)心理健康服务建议与患者的风险评估相一致,以及(4)服务结果的变化,包括急诊室住院时间(LOS)、复诊和入院/转院:2018年至2019年,我们在四个ED站点实施了该路径,使用理论领域框架为每个站点制定了量身定制的策略。我们在 2017-2018 年(实施前)和 2019-2020 年(实施后)分别进行了病历回顾。非参数检验检验了实施期间服务成果的差异:各医疗点的路径使用率差异很大,从第 4 医疗点的 3.1% 到牵头医疗点(第 2 医疗点)的 83.0%。更多转介到社区精神健康机构(P 结论:在牵头机构,路径的实施取得了部分成功:牵头机构的实施取得了部分成功,显示出路径使用率较高以及向社区精神健康机构转介的人数较多。这些发现强调了在各种急诊室环境中实施路径的复杂性。成功的实施需要与现有的工作流程相结合:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT02590302)。注册日期:2015 年 10 月 29 日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信