National Analysis of Surgical Intervention for Orbital Floor Fractures: Implications on Early Versus Late Repair.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Chen Shen, Jennifer K Shah, Rahim Nazerali, Michael K Matthew
{"title":"National Analysis of Surgical Intervention for Orbital Floor Fractures: Implications on Early Versus Late Repair.","authors":"Chen Shen, Jennifer K Shah, Rahim Nazerali, Michael K Matthew","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The timing of intervention for patients with orbital floor fractures is controversial. Some data suggest that symptomatic patients have improved outcomes with early surgery, whereas other studies demonstrate equivalent outcomes even if patients were observed for weeks to months. Our study aims to evaluate national trends and safety outcomes of timing of intervention for isolated orbital floor fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From the Merative™ MarketScan® Research Databases, patients were queried from January 2007 to December 2022. ICD-9, ICD-10, and CPT codes were used to identify patients with orbital floor fractures, without entrapment, intracranial injuries, other face/skull fractures, or ocular injuries. Rates of enophthalmos and diplopia were examined relative to timing of intervention (no repair, early repair [≤2 weeks], or late repair [>2 weeks]).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 75,882 patients identified, 11,728 were included in the study. The mean age was 39.11 years. A total of 174 (1.5%) presented with enophthalmos, and 721 (6.2%) presented with diplopia. Among the cohort, 9180 (78.3%) underwent no repair, 2043 (17.4%) underwent early repair, and 505 (4.3%) underwent late repair. Intervention was correlated with presentation of enophthalmos (OR, 7.960; P = 0.003) and diplopia (OR, 4.111; P < 0.001). Late versus early repair was not associated with presentation of enophthalmos (OR, 0.830; P = 0.453) or diplopia (OR, 0.956; P = 0.761). Provider specialty, specifically subspecialty providers, was significantly associated with undergoing early repair. At 1-year follow-up, enophthalmos and diplopia were diagnosed in 50 (0.5%) and 261 (2.8%) patients who underwent no repair, 87 (4.3%) and 296 (14.5%) patients who underwent early repair, and 24 (4.8%) and 70 (13.9%) patients who underwent late repair. Patients who underwent early repair were more likely to undergo revision surgery (OR, 0.245; P < 0.001). There were similar rates of enophthalmos and diplopia at 1-year follow-up between patients who underwent early repair versus late repair within the asymptomatic at day of injury cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Decision to intervene on orbital floor fractures is strongly correlated with symptoms on initial presentation. From our analysis, rates of enophthalmos and diplopia were similar at 1-year follow-up. Early repair was associated with providers of surgical subspecialties and multiple repairs.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":"94 4S Suppl 2","pages":"S246-S252"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004270","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The timing of intervention for patients with orbital floor fractures is controversial. Some data suggest that symptomatic patients have improved outcomes with early surgery, whereas other studies demonstrate equivalent outcomes even if patients were observed for weeks to months. Our study aims to evaluate national trends and safety outcomes of timing of intervention for isolated orbital floor fractures.

Methods: From the Merative™ MarketScan® Research Databases, patients were queried from January 2007 to December 2022. ICD-9, ICD-10, and CPT codes were used to identify patients with orbital floor fractures, without entrapment, intracranial injuries, other face/skull fractures, or ocular injuries. Rates of enophthalmos and diplopia were examined relative to timing of intervention (no repair, early repair [≤2 weeks], or late repair [>2 weeks]).

Results: Of the 75,882 patients identified, 11,728 were included in the study. The mean age was 39.11 years. A total of 174 (1.5%) presented with enophthalmos, and 721 (6.2%) presented with diplopia. Among the cohort, 9180 (78.3%) underwent no repair, 2043 (17.4%) underwent early repair, and 505 (4.3%) underwent late repair. Intervention was correlated with presentation of enophthalmos (OR, 7.960; P = 0.003) and diplopia (OR, 4.111; P < 0.001). Late versus early repair was not associated with presentation of enophthalmos (OR, 0.830; P = 0.453) or diplopia (OR, 0.956; P = 0.761). Provider specialty, specifically subspecialty providers, was significantly associated with undergoing early repair. At 1-year follow-up, enophthalmos and diplopia were diagnosed in 50 (0.5%) and 261 (2.8%) patients who underwent no repair, 87 (4.3%) and 296 (14.5%) patients who underwent early repair, and 24 (4.8%) and 70 (13.9%) patients who underwent late repair. Patients who underwent early repair were more likely to undergo revision surgery (OR, 0.245; P < 0.001). There were similar rates of enophthalmos and diplopia at 1-year follow-up between patients who underwent early repair versus late repair within the asymptomatic at day of injury cohort.

Conclusions: Decision to intervene on orbital floor fractures is strongly correlated with symptoms on initial presentation. From our analysis, rates of enophthalmos and diplopia were similar at 1-year follow-up. Early repair was associated with providers of surgical subspecialties and multiple repairs.

眶底骨折手术干预的全国分析:早期与晚期修复的意义。
眶底骨折患者的干预时机存在争议。一些数据表明,有症状的患者通过早期手术可以改善预后,而其他研究表明,即使观察患者数周至数月,也可以获得相同的结果。我们的研究旨在评估孤立性眶底骨折干预时机的国家趋势和安全结果。方法:从Merative™MarketScan®研究数据库中查询2007年1月至2022年12月的患者。使用ICD-9、ICD-10和CPT代码识别眶底骨折患者,无夹持、颅内损伤、其他面部/颅骨骨折或眼部损伤。对照干预时间(无修复、早期修复[≤2周]、晚期修复[≤2周])检查眼内陷和复视的发生率。结果:在确定的75,882例患者中,11,728例纳入研究。平均年龄39.11岁。其中,眼内陷174例(1.5%),复视721例(6.2%)。在队列中,9180例(78.3%)未进行修复,2043例(17.4%)进行了早期修复,505例(4.3%)进行了晚期修复。干预与眼球内陷的出现相关(OR, 7.960;P = 0.003)和复视(OR, 4.111;P < 0.001)。晚或早修复与内陷的表现无关(OR, 0.830;P = 0.453)或复视(or, 0.956;P = 0.761)。提供者专业,特别是亚专业提供者,与接受早期修复显著相关。在1年的随访中,未行修复术的患者分别有50例(0.5%)和261例(2.8%)诊断为内陷和复视,早期修复术的患者分别有87例(4.3%)和296例(14.5%),晚期修复术的患者分别有24例(4.8%)和70例(13.9%)诊断为内陷和复视。接受早期修复的患者更有可能接受翻修手术(OR, 0.245;P < 0.001)。在1年的随访中,在损伤当日无症状的患者中,接受早期修复和晚期修复的患者的眼内陷和复视发生率相似。结论:对眶底骨折进行干预的决定与最初出现的症状密切相关。从我们的分析来看,眼球内陷和复视的发生率在1年的随访中是相似的。早期修复与外科亚专科和多次修复的提供者有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The only independent journal devoted to general plastic and reconstructive surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery serves as a forum for current scientific and clinical advances in the field and a sounding board for ideas and perspectives on its future. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, brief communications, case reports, and notes in all areas of interest to the practicing plastic surgeon. There are also historical and current reviews, descriptions of surgical technique, and lively editorials and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信