Comparing Primary Coaptation and Allograft in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction: Long-Term Sensory and BREAST-Q Outcomes.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Ashley Zhang, Sophia Salingaros, Sophia Arbuiso, Grant G Black, Marcos Lu Wang, Hao Huang, David Otterburn
{"title":"Comparing Primary Coaptation and Allograft in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction: Long-Term Sensory and BREAST-Q Outcomes.","authors":"Ashley Zhang, Sophia Salingaros, Sophia Arbuiso, Grant G Black, Marcos Lu Wang, Hao Huang, David Otterburn","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Loss of breast sensation after mastectomy and breast reconstruction is associated with decreased psychosocial outcomes and quality-of-life, spurring applications of peripheral nerve repair to autologous breast reconstruction. While direct nerve coaptation is the gold standard for neurotization, the development of nerve allografts has increased candidacy for neurotization. Herein, we investigate long-term sensory and BREAST-Q outcomes in patients receiving deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap reconstruction neurotized by direct coaptation and nerve allograft.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with neurotized DIEP reconstruction with direct coaptation or nerve allograft were retrospectively identified and invited to undergo breast sensation testing with a pressure-specified sensory device. Patients also completed the Reconstruction and Breast Sensation modules of the BREAST-Q questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>30 patients (53 flaps) were included in this study, with 18 flaps reconstructed with direct nerve coaptation and 35 flaps reconstructed with an allograft. The overall breast cutaneous sensitivity measurement was 64.58 g/mm2 [40.06, 78.99] in the direct coaptation group and 78.28 g/mm2 [40.60, 82.06] in the nerve allograft group, with no significant differences overall (P = 0.680) or at any specific breast area. BREAST-Q surveys were completed at an average follow-up time of 94.42 months in the direct coaptation group and 61.56 months in the allograft group. The two groups had comparable scores for all survey scales (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DIEP flaps neurotized by direct coaptation and nerve allograft have comparable long-term objective and patient-reported breast sensation. Nerve grafting is a viable alternative for patients who are not candidates for direct end-to-end nerve coaptation.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":"94 4S Suppl 2","pages":"S291-S296"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004266","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Loss of breast sensation after mastectomy and breast reconstruction is associated with decreased psychosocial outcomes and quality-of-life, spurring applications of peripheral nerve repair to autologous breast reconstruction. While direct nerve coaptation is the gold standard for neurotization, the development of nerve allografts has increased candidacy for neurotization. Herein, we investigate long-term sensory and BREAST-Q outcomes in patients receiving deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap reconstruction neurotized by direct coaptation and nerve allograft.

Methods: Patients with neurotized DIEP reconstruction with direct coaptation or nerve allograft were retrospectively identified and invited to undergo breast sensation testing with a pressure-specified sensory device. Patients also completed the Reconstruction and Breast Sensation modules of the BREAST-Q questionnaire.

Results: 30 patients (53 flaps) were included in this study, with 18 flaps reconstructed with direct nerve coaptation and 35 flaps reconstructed with an allograft. The overall breast cutaneous sensitivity measurement was 64.58 g/mm2 [40.06, 78.99] in the direct coaptation group and 78.28 g/mm2 [40.60, 82.06] in the nerve allograft group, with no significant differences overall (P = 0.680) or at any specific breast area. BREAST-Q surveys were completed at an average follow-up time of 94.42 months in the direct coaptation group and 61.56 months in the allograft group. The two groups had comparable scores for all survey scales (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: DIEP flaps neurotized by direct coaptation and nerve allograft have comparable long-term objective and patient-reported breast sensation. Nerve grafting is a viable alternative for patients who are not candidates for direct end-to-end nerve coaptation.

腹壁深下穿支皮瓣乳房重建术中初次移植与同种异体移植的比较:长期感觉和Breast - q结果。
背景:乳房切除术和乳房再造术后乳房感觉丧失与心理社会结局和生活质量下降有关,刺激了周围神经修复在自体乳房再造术中的应用。虽然直接神经适应是神经化的金标准,但同种异体神经移植的发展增加了神经化的候选性。在此,我们研究了接受直接覆盖和同种异体神经移植的腹下穿支(DIEP)皮瓣重建的患者的长期感觉和BREAST-Q结果。方法:回顾性分析采用直接覆盖或同种异体神经移植进行神经化DIEP重建的患者,并邀请他们使用压力指定的感觉装置进行乳房感觉测试。患者还完成了Breast - q问卷中的乳房重建和乳房感觉模块。结果:本研究共纳入30例(53个)皮瓣,其中18个皮瓣采用神经直接覆盖法重建,35个皮瓣采用同种异体移植法重建。同种异体神经移植组整体乳腺皮肤敏感性测量值为64.58 g/mm2[40.06, 78.99],整体差异无统计学意义(P = 0.680),任何特定乳房区域差异无统计学意义(P = 0.680)。直接适应组和同种异体移植组的平均随访时间分别为94.42个月和61.56个月。两组在所有调查量表上的得分相当(P < 0.05)。结论:经直接适配和同种异体神经移植的DIEP皮瓣具有相当的远期目标和患者报告的乳房感觉。神经移植是一个可行的替代患者谁不是候选人直接端到端神经接合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The only independent journal devoted to general plastic and reconstructive surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery serves as a forum for current scientific and clinical advances in the field and a sounding board for ideas and perspectives on its future. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, brief communications, case reports, and notes in all areas of interest to the practicing plastic surgeon. There are also historical and current reviews, descriptions of surgical technique, and lively editorials and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信