Assessing Perioperative Complications and Cost of Nipple-Areolar Complex Neurotization in Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: A Matched-Paired Comparison.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Carter J Boyd, Kshipra Hemal, Thomas J Sorenson, Chris Amro, Samantha Lu, Brooke Miller, Nolan S Karp, Mihye Choi
{"title":"Assessing Perioperative Complications and Cost of Nipple-Areolar Complex Neurotization in Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: A Matched-Paired Comparison.","authors":"Carter J Boyd, Kshipra Hemal, Thomas J Sorenson, Chris Amro, Samantha Lu, Brooke Miller, Nolan S Karp, Mihye Choi","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Reports suggest neurotization can help restore sensation in patients undergoing implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) following nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM). There is a dearth of information regarding the outcomes and cost associated with neurotization of the nipple-areola complex (NAC). The objective of this study is to determine perioperative complications of performing NAC neurotization in IBBR and analyze the added cost of performing this procedure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was performed of patients who underwent NSM with IBBR. Breasts undergoing neurotization of the NAC were compared to breasts that did not undergo neurotization using 2:1 propensity score matching on age, reconstruction type, and BMI. Primary endpoints included 30-day complications and cost. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, t tests, and chi-square tests where applicable with a predetermined level of significance of P < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 15 patients (26 breasts) were in the neurotized cohort and matched to 30 patients (52 breasts) in the nonneurotized cohort. Mean follow-up period was 10 months and significantly lower in neurotized group (P < 0.001). Rates of major and minor complications did not vary by neurotization (P > 0.05). Cases of neurotization added a mean cost of $7839 per breast.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As NAC neurotization introduces increased complexity from coordination with the oncologic surgeons, use of microsurgical instruments, and additional implantable devices, it is important to compare perioperative outcomes to standard breast reconstruction. As our institution begins to offer this new technique, we have identified no increased risk of perioperative complications with NAC neurotization.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":"94 4S Suppl 2","pages":"S118-S120"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004177","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Reports suggest neurotization can help restore sensation in patients undergoing implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) following nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM). There is a dearth of information regarding the outcomes and cost associated with neurotization of the nipple-areola complex (NAC). The objective of this study is to determine perioperative complications of performing NAC neurotization in IBBR and analyze the added cost of performing this procedure.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed of patients who underwent NSM with IBBR. Breasts undergoing neurotization of the NAC were compared to breasts that did not undergo neurotization using 2:1 propensity score matching on age, reconstruction type, and BMI. Primary endpoints included 30-day complications and cost. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, t tests, and chi-square tests where applicable with a predetermined level of significance of P < 0.05.

Results: A total of 15 patients (26 breasts) were in the neurotized cohort and matched to 30 patients (52 breasts) in the nonneurotized cohort. Mean follow-up period was 10 months and significantly lower in neurotized group (P < 0.001). Rates of major and minor complications did not vary by neurotization (P > 0.05). Cases of neurotization added a mean cost of $7839 per breast.

Conclusions: As NAC neurotization introduces increased complexity from coordination with the oncologic surgeons, use of microsurgical instruments, and additional implantable devices, it is important to compare perioperative outcomes to standard breast reconstruction. As our institution begins to offer this new technique, we have identified no increased risk of perioperative complications with NAC neurotization.

评估保留乳头乳房切除术后立即植体乳房重建术围手术期并发症和费用:配对比较。
背景:报告显示神经化可以帮助保留乳头乳房切除术(NSM)后接受植入式乳房重建术(IBBR)的患者恢复感觉。关于乳头-乳晕复合体(NAC)神经化的结果和费用的信息缺乏。本研究的目的是确定在IBBR中实施NAC神经化的围手术期并发症,并分析实施该手术的额外成本。方法:对合并IBBR的NSM患者进行回顾性分析。将接受NAC神经化的乳房与未接受神经化的乳房进行比较,使用2:1的倾向评分匹配年龄、重建类型和BMI。主要终点包括30天并发症和费用。统计分析包括描述性统计、t检验和卡方检验(如适用),P < 0.05为预定显著性水平。结果:神经化组共有15例患者(26个乳房),非神经化组有30例患者(52个乳房)。神经化组平均随访时间为10个月,显著低于对照组(P < 0.001)。主要和次要并发症的发生率无神经化差异(P < 0.05)。神经化的病例增加了每个乳房7839美元的平均费用。结论:由于NAC神经化与肿瘤外科医生的协调、显微手术器械的使用和额外的植入式装置增加了复杂性,因此将围手术期结果与标准乳房重建进行比较是很重要的。当我们的机构开始提供这项新技术时,我们已经确定NAC神经化的围手术期并发症的风险没有增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The only independent journal devoted to general plastic and reconstructive surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery serves as a forum for current scientific and clinical advances in the field and a sounding board for ideas and perspectives on its future. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, brief communications, case reports, and notes in all areas of interest to the practicing plastic surgeon. There are also historical and current reviews, descriptions of surgical technique, and lively editorials and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信