{"title":"Current Status of Diagnostic Process in Asymptomatic Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in Japan.","authors":"Yoshimasa Seike, Nobuyoshi Azuma, Takao Ohki, Noriyasu Morikage, Akio Kodama, Makoto Sumi, Koji Maeda, Hitoshi Matsuda","doi":"10.3400/avd.oa.25-00025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> This study aimed to investigate the actual detection process and diagnostic methods for asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in a multicenter setting, and to plan an effective screening strategy for asymptomatic AAA. <b>Methods:</b> The subjects of this multicenter study were collected in a retrospective manner at 7 facilities. A total of 1894 patients with AAA, including iliac artery aneurysms, who were considered asymptomatic with a confirmed initial diagnosis from January 2018 to December 2022, were collected and reviewed. <b>Results:</b> A total of 1666 patients who were diagnosed with asymptomatic AAA were included [83.9% males, median age of 75 (69-81) years]. Asymptomatic AAAs were frequently diagnosed during examinations for other diseases in 1339 patients (80.4%), whereas health screenings accounted for only 313 (18.8%). Computed tomography (CT) was the most commonly used diagnostic method (n = 1352, 81.2%) compared to abdominal ultrasonography (n = 252, 15.2%). <b>Conclusions:</b> Asymptomatic AAAs are detected incidentally during examinations for other diseases, and there is an urgent need to promote health screening. Most AAAs are diagnosed by CT; nevertheless, we consider that abdominal ultrasonography would be the most appropriate modality for AAA screening because of its reasonable accuracy, noninvasiveness, and low cost.</p>","PeriodicalId":7995,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular diseases","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11957909/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of vascular diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3400/avd.oa.25-00025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the actual detection process and diagnostic methods for asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in a multicenter setting, and to plan an effective screening strategy for asymptomatic AAA. Methods: The subjects of this multicenter study were collected in a retrospective manner at 7 facilities. A total of 1894 patients with AAA, including iliac artery aneurysms, who were considered asymptomatic with a confirmed initial diagnosis from January 2018 to December 2022, were collected and reviewed. Results: A total of 1666 patients who were diagnosed with asymptomatic AAA were included [83.9% males, median age of 75 (69-81) years]. Asymptomatic AAAs were frequently diagnosed during examinations for other diseases in 1339 patients (80.4%), whereas health screenings accounted for only 313 (18.8%). Computed tomography (CT) was the most commonly used diagnostic method (n = 1352, 81.2%) compared to abdominal ultrasonography (n = 252, 15.2%). Conclusions: Asymptomatic AAAs are detected incidentally during examinations for other diseases, and there is an urgent need to promote health screening. Most AAAs are diagnosed by CT; nevertheless, we consider that abdominal ultrasonography would be the most appropriate modality for AAA screening because of its reasonable accuracy, noninvasiveness, and low cost.