Time-dependent effects of prone position on ventilation-perfusion matching assessed by electrical impedance tomography in patients with COVID-19 ARDS: sub-analysis of a prospective physiological study.

IF 5.7 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Yuxian Wang, Yaxiaerjiang Muhetaer, Xin Zheng, Wei Wu, Jiale Tao, Ling Zhu, Jieqiong Song, Zhanqi Zhao, Ming Zhong
{"title":"Time-dependent effects of prone position on ventilation-perfusion matching assessed by electrical impedance tomography in patients with COVID-19 ARDS: sub-analysis of a prospective physiological study.","authors":"Yuxian Wang, Yaxiaerjiang Muhetaer, Xin Zheng, Wei Wu, Jiale Tao, Ling Zhu, Jieqiong Song, Zhanqi Zhao, Ming Zhong","doi":"10.1186/s13613-025-01452-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prone positioning (PP) has been shown to improve oxygenation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS); with a focus on its early physiological effects. However, the time-dependent effects of PP on ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) matching have not been fully investigated. In this study we aimed to investigate the longitudinal effects of PP on regional V/Q matching and the distribution of ventilation and perfusion in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-associated ARDS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study analyzed patients with COVID-19 ARDS who were mechanically ventilated and underwent their first PP treatment. V/Q mismatching was assessed using electrical impedance tomography (EIT). At five intervals during the initial PP session PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> measurements and EIT evaluations were performed including: before the initiation of PP while in the supine position (SP), 1 h after PP (PP<sub>1</sub>), 3 h after PP (PP<sub>3</sub>), 16 h after PP (PP<sub>end</sub>), and 3 h after reverting to the supine position (RE-SP<sub>3</sub>).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study eighteen COVID-19 ARDS patients were enrolled. In comparison with SP, PP led to significant improvements in oxygenation, with PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> consistently increasing at each PP time point and peaking at PP<sub>end</sub>. Dorsal ventilation significantly increased at PP<sub>1</sub> (P = .047), and steadily rose during PP, with a higher increase at PP<sub>end</sub> than PP<sub>1</sub> (P < .001). Dorsal perfusion remained unchanged during the first three hours of PP; however, significantly increased by PP<sub>end</sub>. Ventilation and perfusion returned to their baseline levels at RE-SP<sub>3</sub>. PP increased normal V/Q (%), and decreased non-perfused (%), low V/Q (%), particularly in the dorsal lung regions, compared with SP. At RE-SP<sub>3</sub>, there was a marked increase in the non-ventilated (%), low V/Q (%), and non-perfused (%) compared with PP. The global inhomogeneity (GI)-V/Q ratio was noted to have decreased during PP and correlated with an increase in PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub>.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In COVID-19-induced ARDS patients, prone positioning initially improves oxygenation and V/Q matching by enhancing ventilation distribution and decreasing low V/Q (%). Over time, perfusion changes further improve V/Q matching, but these benefits diminish once the patient returns to the supine position, leading to increased V/Q mismatch. Trial registration Clinical Trials.gov, NCT04725227. Registered 25 January 2021, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04725227?cond=NCT04725227&rank=1.</p>","PeriodicalId":7966,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Intensive Care","volume":"15 1","pages":"46"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11958859/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-025-01452-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Prone positioning (PP) has been shown to improve oxygenation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS); with a focus on its early physiological effects. However, the time-dependent effects of PP on ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) matching have not been fully investigated. In this study we aimed to investigate the longitudinal effects of PP on regional V/Q matching and the distribution of ventilation and perfusion in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-associated ARDS.

Methods: This study analyzed patients with COVID-19 ARDS who were mechanically ventilated and underwent their first PP treatment. V/Q mismatching was assessed using electrical impedance tomography (EIT). At five intervals during the initial PP session PaO2/FiO2 measurements and EIT evaluations were performed including: before the initiation of PP while in the supine position (SP), 1 h after PP (PP1), 3 h after PP (PP3), 16 h after PP (PPend), and 3 h after reverting to the supine position (RE-SP3).

Results: In this study eighteen COVID-19 ARDS patients were enrolled. In comparison with SP, PP led to significant improvements in oxygenation, with PaO2/FiO2 consistently increasing at each PP time point and peaking at PPend. Dorsal ventilation significantly increased at PP1 (P = .047), and steadily rose during PP, with a higher increase at PPend than PP1 (P < .001). Dorsal perfusion remained unchanged during the first three hours of PP; however, significantly increased by PPend. Ventilation and perfusion returned to their baseline levels at RE-SP3. PP increased normal V/Q (%), and decreased non-perfused (%), low V/Q (%), particularly in the dorsal lung regions, compared with SP. At RE-SP3, there was a marked increase in the non-ventilated (%), low V/Q (%), and non-perfused (%) compared with PP. The global inhomogeneity (GI)-V/Q ratio was noted to have decreased during PP and correlated with an increase in PaO2/FiO2.

Conclusions: In COVID-19-induced ARDS patients, prone positioning initially improves oxygenation and V/Q matching by enhancing ventilation distribution and decreasing low V/Q (%). Over time, perfusion changes further improve V/Q matching, but these benefits diminish once the patient returns to the supine position, leading to increased V/Q mismatch. Trial registration Clinical Trials.gov, NCT04725227. Registered 25 January 2021, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04725227?cond=NCT04725227&rank=1.

俯卧位对COVID-19 ARDS患者电阻抗断层扫描评估的通气灌注匹配的时间依赖性影响:一项前瞻性生理研究的亚分析
背景:俯卧位(PP)已被证明可以改善急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者的氧合;重点关注其早期生理效应。然而,PP对通气-灌注(V/Q)匹配的时间依赖性影响尚未得到充分研究。在本研究中,我们旨在探讨PP对2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)相关ARDS患者区域V/Q匹配和通气灌注分布的纵向影响。方法:本研究对首次PP治疗的机械通气的COVID-19 ARDS患者进行分析。使用电阻抗断层扫描(EIT)评估V/Q不匹配。在初始PP过程中,分5个间隔进行PaO2/FiO2测量和EIT评估,包括:PP开始前仰卧位(SP), PP后1小时(PP1), PP后3小时(PP3), PP后16小时(PPend)和恢复仰卧位后3小时(RE-SP3)。结果:本研究纳入18例COVID-19 ARDS患者。与SP相比,PP显著改善了氧合,PaO2/FiO2在PP的每个时间点持续增加,并在PPend达到峰值。背侧通气量在PP1时显著增加(P = 0.047),在PP期间稳步上升,且PPend的增幅高于PP1 (P)。通气和灌注恢复到RE-SP3时的基线水平。与SP相比,PP增加了正常V/Q(%),降低了非灌注(%)、低V/Q(%),尤其是在肺背区。RE-SP3时,与PP相比,非通气(%)、低V/Q(%)和非灌注(%)明显增加。PP期间,全球不均匀性(GI)-V/Q比下降,并与PaO2/FiO2增加相关。结论:在covid -19诱导的ARDS患者中,俯卧位通过加强通气分配和降低低V/Q(%),初步改善氧合和V/Q匹配。随着时间的推移,灌注改变进一步改善了V/Q匹配,但一旦患者回到仰卧位,这些好处就会减少,导致V/Q不匹配增加。临床试验。gov, NCT04725227。2021年1月25日注册,https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04725227?cond=NCT04725227&rank=1。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Intensive Care
Annals of Intensive Care CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
107
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Intensive Care is an online peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality review articles and original research papers in the field of intensive care medicine. It targets critical care providers including attending physicians, fellows, residents, nurses, and physiotherapists, who aim to enhance their knowledge and provide optimal care for their patients. The journal's articles are included in various prestigious databases such as CAS, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, OCLC, PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded, SCOPUS, and Summon by Serial Solutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信