A series of randomized trials of behavioral economic interventions to increase racial and ethnic diversity of research participants: Rationale and design of ITERATE

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Nirali Patel BS, BA , Casey Whitman MS , Adina Lieberman MPH , Shira Blady BS , Colleen Morse PT, DPT, MSA , Nawar Naseer PhD, MPH , Joellen Weaver MT (ASCP) , Modele O. Ogunniyi MD, MPH , Rachel Kohn MD, MSCE , Kevin G. Volpp MD, PhD , Scott D. Halpern MD, PhD , Alanna A. Morris MD, MSc , Alisa Stephens-Shields PhD , Alexander C. Fanaroff MD, MHS
{"title":"A series of randomized trials of behavioral economic interventions to increase racial and ethnic diversity of research participants: Rationale and design of ITERATE","authors":"Nirali Patel BS, BA ,&nbsp;Casey Whitman MS ,&nbsp;Adina Lieberman MPH ,&nbsp;Shira Blady BS ,&nbsp;Colleen Morse PT, DPT, MSA ,&nbsp;Nawar Naseer PhD, MPH ,&nbsp;Joellen Weaver MT (ASCP) ,&nbsp;Modele O. Ogunniyi MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Rachel Kohn MD, MSCE ,&nbsp;Kevin G. Volpp MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Scott D. Halpern MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Alanna A. Morris MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Alisa Stephens-Shields PhD ,&nbsp;Alexander C. Fanaroff MD, MHS","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2025.03.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale</h3><div>Prospective clinical research studies are essential for determining the effectiveness and safety of drugs, medical devices, and healthcare delivery interventions. However, low enrollment, particularly among Black and Hispanic patients, challenges the generalizability of results and fairness of research. Leveraging insights from behavioral economics to modify the content of messages recruiting patients to join research studies may increase enrollment and representativeness of trial populations.</div></div><div><h3>Primary hypothesis</h3><div>Method of outreach, source of outreach, message framing, and financial incentives will have important effects on enrollment fraction of Black and Hispanic patients electronically approached for participation in a prospective clinical research study.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>ITERATE (NCT05827718) is a series of 4 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) designed to rigorously, systematically, and iteratively test the effects of different messaging strategies informed by behavioral economic theory on the enrollment of Black and Hispanic individuals into the Penn Medicine BioBank (PMBB), a prospective registry. For all 4 RCTs, we will identify patients eligible for enrollment in the PMBB (those with ≥ 1 encounter with the University of Pennsylvania Health System in the past 3 months, a phone number able to receive text messages or a valid email address on file, no history of consenting to or declining enrollment in the PMBB, and able to provide their own consent) and randomly assign them to receive different outreach messages. RCT 1 will test the method of outreach (email vs. text message vs. email + text message); RCT 2, source of outreach (research team vs. clinical team); RCT 3, message framing (appeal to altruism vs. appeal to social proof vs. control); and RCT 4, financial incentive (none vs. medium guarantee vs. small guarantee + small lottery vs. medium lottery vs. large lottery). In each RCT, at least 50% of the participants will be Black or Hispanic. The primary outcome of each RCT is enrollment fraction, defined as the number of participants who enroll in the PMBB divided by the total number of participants who received an outreach message, compared between arms among both Black and Hispanic patients. Secondary outcomes will include overall enrollment fraction and enrollment fraction among White patients. The “winning” strategies in earlier RCTs will be incorporated as the “standard of care” in the subsequent RCTs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":"286 ","pages":"Pages 80-87"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American heart journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002870325000985","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale

Prospective clinical research studies are essential for determining the effectiveness and safety of drugs, medical devices, and healthcare delivery interventions. However, low enrollment, particularly among Black and Hispanic patients, challenges the generalizability of results and fairness of research. Leveraging insights from behavioral economics to modify the content of messages recruiting patients to join research studies may increase enrollment and representativeness of trial populations.

Primary hypothesis

Method of outreach, source of outreach, message framing, and financial incentives will have important effects on enrollment fraction of Black and Hispanic patients electronically approached for participation in a prospective clinical research study.

Design

ITERATE (NCT05827718) is a series of 4 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) designed to rigorously, systematically, and iteratively test the effects of different messaging strategies informed by behavioral economic theory on the enrollment of Black and Hispanic individuals into the Penn Medicine BioBank (PMBB), a prospective registry. For all 4 RCTs, we will identify patients eligible for enrollment in the PMBB (those with ≥ 1 encounter with the University of Pennsylvania Health System in the past 3 months, a phone number able to receive text messages or a valid email address on file, no history of consenting to or declining enrollment in the PMBB, and able to provide their own consent) and randomly assign them to receive different outreach messages. RCT 1 will test the method of outreach (email vs. text message vs. email + text message); RCT 2, source of outreach (research team vs. clinical team); RCT 3, message framing (appeal to altruism vs. appeal to social proof vs. control); and RCT 4, financial incentive (none vs. medium guarantee vs. small guarantee + small lottery vs. medium lottery vs. large lottery). In each RCT, at least 50% of the participants will be Black or Hispanic. The primary outcome of each RCT is enrollment fraction, defined as the number of participants who enroll in the PMBB divided by the total number of participants who received an outreach message, compared between arms among both Black and Hispanic patients. Secondary outcomes will include overall enrollment fraction and enrollment fraction among White patients. The “winning” strategies in earlier RCTs will be incorporated as the “standard of care” in the subsequent RCTs.
行为经济干预增加研究参与者种族和民族多样性的一系列随机试验:ITERATE的基本原理和设计。
理由:前瞻性临床研究对于确定药物、医疗器械和医疗保健干预措施的有效性和安全性至关重要。然而,低入学率,特别是在黑人和西班牙裔患者中,挑战了结果的普遍性和研究的公平性。利用行为经济学的见解来修改招募患者加入研究的信息内容,可能会增加试验人群的入组率和代表性。主要假设:外展方法、外展来源、信息框架和财务激励将对前瞻性临床研究中黑人和西班牙裔患者的电子入组率产生重要影响。设计:ITERATE (NCT05827718)是一系列四项随机临床试验(rct),旨在严格、系统和迭代地测试根据行为经济学理论提供的不同信息传递策略对进入宾夕法尼亚大学医学生物库(PMBB)的黑人和西班牙裔个体的影响。在所有四项随机对照试验中,我们将确定有资格加入PMBB的患者(在过去3个月内与宾夕法尼亚大学卫生系统有≥1次接触的患者,可以接收短信的电话号码或有效的电子邮件地址,没有同意或拒绝加入PMBB的历史,并且能够提供自己的同意),并随机分配他们接收不同的外展信息。RCT 1将测试外展方法(电子邮件vs.短信vs.电子邮件 + 短信);RCT 2,外展来源(研究团队vs.临床团队);RCT 3,信息框架(利他主义诉求vs社会认同诉求vs控制诉求);RCT 4,财务激励(无担保vs中担保vs小担保 + 小彩票vs中彩票vs大彩票)。在每个随机对照试验中,至少有50%的参与者是黑人或西班牙裔。每个RCT的主要结果是入组分数,定义为参加PMBB的参与者人数除以接受外展信息的参与者总数,比较两组黑人和西班牙裔患者。次要结局包括白人患者的总入组率和入组率。早期随机对照试验中的“获胜”策略将被纳入后续随机对照试验的“护理标准”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American heart journal
American heart journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
2.10%
发文量
214
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The American Heart Journal will consider for publication suitable articles on topics pertaining to the broad discipline of cardiovascular disease. Our goal is to provide the reader primary investigation, scholarly review, and opinion concerning the practice of cardiovascular medicine. We especially encourage submission of 3 types of reports that are not frequently seen in cardiovascular journals: negative clinical studies, reports on study designs, and studies involving the organization of medical care. The Journal does not accept individual case reports or original articles involving bench laboratory or animal research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信