{"title":"Characteristics and outcomes of consultation-liaison psychiatry referrals: A demographic and clinical analysis.","authors":"Pablo Richly, William Moon, Matthew Jenkins","doi":"10.1177/10398562251330954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundConsultation-liaison psychiatry (CLP) provides mental health expertise in general hospitals, where psychiatric comorbidities affect approximately 30% of patients. Following implementation of a new electronic referral system at Waikato Hospital, this study aimed to analyse referral quality and service utilisation patterns.MethodsA 12-month retrospective audit was conducted from July 2023 to June 2024, analysing all CLP referrals using a new system incorporating the Identify and Rate the Aim of the Contact (IRAC) tool and referral quality metrics. Referral quality was assessed both pre- and post-patient evaluation using a five-point Likert scale.ResultsOf 939 referrals (789 unique patients), 63.7% were rated as relevant to highly relevant. The average referral quality score was 2.698 pre-assessment and 2.682 post-assessment. General Medicine generated the most referrals, while Obstetrics/Gynaecology and Neurology showed lower quality scores. The mean time from admission to referral was 5.4 days. Risk assessment and management were the primary referral purposes, with 11.4% related to suicide attempts. Each referral averaged 3.64 contacts, with 20% of referrals consuming 54% of total contacts.ConclusionsWhile most referrals were appropriate, quality scores below three indicate room for improvement. Findings suggest the need for targeted educational interventions and feedback mechanisms to enhance referral quality and optimise resource allocation in CLP services.</p>","PeriodicalId":8630,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"10398562251330954"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10398562251330954","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BackgroundConsultation-liaison psychiatry (CLP) provides mental health expertise in general hospitals, where psychiatric comorbidities affect approximately 30% of patients. Following implementation of a new electronic referral system at Waikato Hospital, this study aimed to analyse referral quality and service utilisation patterns.MethodsA 12-month retrospective audit was conducted from July 2023 to June 2024, analysing all CLP referrals using a new system incorporating the Identify and Rate the Aim of the Contact (IRAC) tool and referral quality metrics. Referral quality was assessed both pre- and post-patient evaluation using a five-point Likert scale.ResultsOf 939 referrals (789 unique patients), 63.7% were rated as relevant to highly relevant. The average referral quality score was 2.698 pre-assessment and 2.682 post-assessment. General Medicine generated the most referrals, while Obstetrics/Gynaecology and Neurology showed lower quality scores. The mean time from admission to referral was 5.4 days. Risk assessment and management were the primary referral purposes, with 11.4% related to suicide attempts. Each referral averaged 3.64 contacts, with 20% of referrals consuming 54% of total contacts.ConclusionsWhile most referrals were appropriate, quality scores below three indicate room for improvement. Findings suggest the need for targeted educational interventions and feedback mechanisms to enhance referral quality and optimise resource allocation in CLP services.
期刊介绍:
Australasian Psychiatry is the bi-monthly journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP) that aims to promote the art of psychiatry and its maintenance of excellence in practice. The journal is peer-reviewed and accepts submissions, presented as original research; reviews; descriptions of innovative services; comments on policy, history, politics, economics, training, ethics and the Arts as they relate to mental health and mental health services; statements of opinion and letters. Book reviews are commissioned by the editor. A section of the journal provides information on RANZCP business and related matters.