Differences of patient empowerment between elective and contracted physicians in internal medicine in Austria: a quantitative content analysis.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Bettina Simetsberger, Manfred Pferzinger, Martin K J Waiguny
{"title":"Differences of patient empowerment between elective and contracted physicians in internal medicine in Austria: a quantitative content analysis.","authors":"Bettina Simetsberger, Manfred Pferzinger, Martin K J Waiguny","doi":"10.1186/s12913-025-12635-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physicians impact and promote patient empowerment at various levels. Elective or contracted physicians uniquely provide specialised ambulatory care in Austria. The difference between the two groups is due to the contractual relationship with the social health insurance providers. This paper researches whether there are differences in the promotion of patient empowerment between elective and contracted physicians in internal medicine in Vienna based on four dimensions of patient empowerment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quantitative content analysis analyses the comments on DocFinder.at to identify the differences between the two groups. A deductive-inductive approach based on literature and comments from DocFinder.at led to a codebook with seven categories and forty-eight variables. We collected a total of 1,153 comments, and 912 of them are relevant for further analysis. Differences between elective and contracted physicians became evident through defined dimensions of patient empowerment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the health literacy dimension, elective physicians apply relationship-relevant factors more effectively. They are also more successful in ensuring that patients feel adequately informed. No significant differences were found in the dimension of shared decision-making, but the discussion of treatment options correlated strongly with the amount of time spent by a physician. In the self-management dimension, elective physicians provide more precise and detailed explanations, highlighting their ability to foster better self-management. Differences in the communication dimension favour elective physicians at both factual and interpersonal levels, although there are no significant differences in patient's ability to ask questions and receive answers. Across all dimensions, the time spent with patients emerges as a crucial factor influencing patient empowerment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings open up several avenues for further research, offering an initial understanding of the differences in patient empowerment between elective and contracted physicians. The results reveal that elective physicians are more likely to create a supportive environment for patient empowerment, underscoring the crucial role of physician-patient interactions in this process. However, given the limitations of the current methods, future research could explore these differences through alternative approaches, such as surveys or interviews, to provide a more comprehensive understanding.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"476"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11956238/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12635-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Physicians impact and promote patient empowerment at various levels. Elective or contracted physicians uniquely provide specialised ambulatory care in Austria. The difference between the two groups is due to the contractual relationship with the social health insurance providers. This paper researches whether there are differences in the promotion of patient empowerment between elective and contracted physicians in internal medicine in Vienna based on four dimensions of patient empowerment.

Methods: A quantitative content analysis analyses the comments on DocFinder.at to identify the differences between the two groups. A deductive-inductive approach based on literature and comments from DocFinder.at led to a codebook with seven categories and forty-eight variables. We collected a total of 1,153 comments, and 912 of them are relevant for further analysis. Differences between elective and contracted physicians became evident through defined dimensions of patient empowerment.

Results: In the health literacy dimension, elective physicians apply relationship-relevant factors more effectively. They are also more successful in ensuring that patients feel adequately informed. No significant differences were found in the dimension of shared decision-making, but the discussion of treatment options correlated strongly with the amount of time spent by a physician. In the self-management dimension, elective physicians provide more precise and detailed explanations, highlighting their ability to foster better self-management. Differences in the communication dimension favour elective physicians at both factual and interpersonal levels, although there are no significant differences in patient's ability to ask questions and receive answers. Across all dimensions, the time spent with patients emerges as a crucial factor influencing patient empowerment.

Conclusions: The findings open up several avenues for further research, offering an initial understanding of the differences in patient empowerment between elective and contracted physicians. The results reveal that elective physicians are more likely to create a supportive environment for patient empowerment, underscoring the crucial role of physician-patient interactions in this process. However, given the limitations of the current methods, future research could explore these differences through alternative approaches, such as surveys or interviews, to provide a more comprehensive understanding.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信