Better than risk-free: Reserve premiums and bank lending

IF 2.6 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Raymond Kim
{"title":"Better than risk-free: Reserve premiums and bank lending","authors":"Raymond Kim","doi":"10.1111/fire.12421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>When the Federal Reserve first paid interest on excess reserves (IOER) in October 2008, banks faced a choice to earn a “better than” risk-free rate, or lend to earn a higher, riskier rate. Evidence suggests the “reserves-lending puzzle” is not driven by endogeneity from reverse causality, flight to safety, or increased Treasury supply, but by the introduction of the “reserve premium” (IOER-3MT), which is associated with a reduction of domestic bank-level lending by -5.1% (-$420.2B). Findings suggest the reserves risk channel can aid in restricting inflation. Additionally, recent Senior Financial Officer Surveys corroborate the conclusions presented in this paper.</p>","PeriodicalId":47617,"journal":{"name":"FINANCIAL REVIEW","volume":"60 2","pages":"541-571"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/fire.12421","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FINANCIAL REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fire.12421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When the Federal Reserve first paid interest on excess reserves (IOER) in October 2008, banks faced a choice to earn a “better than” risk-free rate, or lend to earn a higher, riskier rate. Evidence suggests the “reserves-lending puzzle” is not driven by endogeneity from reverse causality, flight to safety, or increased Treasury supply, but by the introduction of the “reserve premium” (IOER-3MT), which is associated with a reduction of domestic bank-level lending by -5.1% (-$420.2B). Findings suggest the reserves risk channel can aid in restricting inflation. Additionally, recent Senior Financial Officer Surveys corroborate the conclusions presented in this paper.

Abstract Image

优于无风险:准备金溢价和银行贷款
当美联储在2008年10月首次对超额准备金(IOER)支付利息时,银行面临着一个选择,要么获得“高于”无风险利率,要么放贷以获得更高、风险更高的利率。有证据表明,“准备金贷款难题”不是由反向因果关系、避险或增加国债供应的内生性驱动的,而是由“准备金溢价”(IOER-3MT)的引入驱动的,这与国内银行层面贷款减少5.1%(- 4202亿美元)有关。研究结果表明,储备风险渠道有助于限制通胀。此外,最近的高级财务官调查证实了本文提出的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
FINANCIAL REVIEW
FINANCIAL REVIEW BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
28.10%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信