Changes in GEDI-based measures of forest structure after large California wildfires relative to pre-fire conditions

IF 11.1 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Matthew L. Clark , Christopher R. Hakkenberg , Tim Bailey , Patrick Burns , Scott J. Goetz
{"title":"Changes in GEDI-based measures of forest structure after large California wildfires relative to pre-fire conditions","authors":"Matthew L. Clark ,&nbsp;Christopher R. Hakkenberg ,&nbsp;Tim Bailey ,&nbsp;Patrick Burns ,&nbsp;Scott J. Goetz","doi":"10.1016/j.rse.2025.114718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Forest productivity, biodiversity, and ecosystem services in California and the Western United States are closely tied to fire. However, fire regimes are shifting toward larger, more severe fires driven by factors such as high fuel loads and increased temperature and aridity. While multispectral satellite (e.g., Landsat) burn indices provide valuable insights into fire severity, they primarily capture top-of-canopy greenness, missing important sub-canopy changes in vegetation structure and residual fuels. The Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) spaceborne lidar mission provides current and consistent, near-global 3D forest structure measurements, enabling detailed assessment of forest changes from disturbances such as wildfire. This study utilized near-coincident, bitemporal pre- and post-fire GEDI on-orbit measurements to analyze structural changes across thirty-four large California wildfires (2019 to 2021). We examined twelve GEDI-based forest structure metrics representing a variety of 3D fuels properties, including forest height, low-stature fuels, biomass, canopy heterogeneity, volume and cover. Our broad goals were to: 1) assess GEDI's ability to detect structural changes in burned areas relative to control areas; and 2) in burned areas, explore relationships between forest structural change and factors such as pre-fire fuel loads, Landsat-based differenced Normalized Burn Ratio (dNBR), topographic slope, wind speed, vapor pressure deficit, evapotranspiration, and time since fire. Results showed significant structural loss in all GEDI structural metrics for burned areas relative to nearby controls. Pre-fire fuel loads measured by GEDI metrics were the strongest predictors of post-fire structural change, with linear models explaining an average of 46 % of variance. Model slopes showed increasing levels of pre-fire fuels were associated with large, significant post-fire decreases in canopy structure – that is, more fuels lead to higher wildfire severity, particularly for conifer forests of the Klamath, Cascades and Sierra Nevada ecoregions. One metric, measuring the proportion of waveform energy below 10 m height, increased significantly after fire in mixed and conifer forests due to canopy opening, which enhanced lidar penetration toward the ground. In contrast, the widely-used dNBR burn severity index was less correlated with GEDI-based forest structural change than pre-fire fuels, particularly in sub-canopy fuels, with models explaining no more than 32 % of the variance (average 19 %). GEDI overcomes key limitations of airborne lidar, including high cost, limited extent, and data latency, enabling scalable and timely assessments of wildfire impacts needed to manage fuels and track forest resilience and recovery. Further, GEDI metrics are physically-based and ecologically interpretable, providing complimentary information to multispectral burn severity indices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":417,"journal":{"name":"Remote Sensing of Environment","volume":"323 ","pages":"Article 114718"},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Remote Sensing of Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425725001221","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Forest productivity, biodiversity, and ecosystem services in California and the Western United States are closely tied to fire. However, fire regimes are shifting toward larger, more severe fires driven by factors such as high fuel loads and increased temperature and aridity. While multispectral satellite (e.g., Landsat) burn indices provide valuable insights into fire severity, they primarily capture top-of-canopy greenness, missing important sub-canopy changes in vegetation structure and residual fuels. The Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) spaceborne lidar mission provides current and consistent, near-global 3D forest structure measurements, enabling detailed assessment of forest changes from disturbances such as wildfire. This study utilized near-coincident, bitemporal pre- and post-fire GEDI on-orbit measurements to analyze structural changes across thirty-four large California wildfires (2019 to 2021). We examined twelve GEDI-based forest structure metrics representing a variety of 3D fuels properties, including forest height, low-stature fuels, biomass, canopy heterogeneity, volume and cover. Our broad goals were to: 1) assess GEDI's ability to detect structural changes in burned areas relative to control areas; and 2) in burned areas, explore relationships between forest structural change and factors such as pre-fire fuel loads, Landsat-based differenced Normalized Burn Ratio (dNBR), topographic slope, wind speed, vapor pressure deficit, evapotranspiration, and time since fire. Results showed significant structural loss in all GEDI structural metrics for burned areas relative to nearby controls. Pre-fire fuel loads measured by GEDI metrics were the strongest predictors of post-fire structural change, with linear models explaining an average of 46 % of variance. Model slopes showed increasing levels of pre-fire fuels were associated with large, significant post-fire decreases in canopy structure – that is, more fuels lead to higher wildfire severity, particularly for conifer forests of the Klamath, Cascades and Sierra Nevada ecoregions. One metric, measuring the proportion of waveform energy below 10 m height, increased significantly after fire in mixed and conifer forests due to canopy opening, which enhanced lidar penetration toward the ground. In contrast, the widely-used dNBR burn severity index was less correlated with GEDI-based forest structural change than pre-fire fuels, particularly in sub-canopy fuels, with models explaining no more than 32 % of the variance (average 19 %). GEDI overcomes key limitations of airborne lidar, including high cost, limited extent, and data latency, enabling scalable and timely assessments of wildfire impacts needed to manage fuels and track forest resilience and recovery. Further, GEDI metrics are physically-based and ecologically interpretable, providing complimentary information to multispectral burn severity indices.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Remote Sensing of Environment
Remote Sensing of Environment 环境科学-成像科学与照相技术
CiteScore
25.10
自引率
8.90%
发文量
455
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Remote Sensing of Environment (RSE) serves the Earth observation community by disseminating results on the theory, science, applications, and technology that contribute to advancing the field of remote sensing. With a thoroughly interdisciplinary approach, RSE encompasses terrestrial, oceanic, and atmospheric sensing. The journal emphasizes biophysical and quantitative approaches to remote sensing at local to global scales, covering a diverse range of applications and techniques. RSE serves as a vital platform for the exchange of knowledge and advancements in the dynamic field of remote sensing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信