Waveform conversion as a prognostic factor of poor prognosis in patients undergoing extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Ken Inoue , Keita Shibahashi , Taichi Kato , Akihiko Inoue , Toru Hifumi , Tetsuya Sakamoto , Yasuhiro Kuroda , Kazuhiro Sugiyama , on behalf of the SAVE-J II Study Group
{"title":"Waveform conversion as a prognostic factor of poor prognosis in patients undergoing extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation","authors":"Ken Inoue ,&nbsp;Keita Shibahashi ,&nbsp;Taichi Kato ,&nbsp;Akihiko Inoue ,&nbsp;Toru Hifumi ,&nbsp;Tetsuya Sakamoto ,&nbsp;Yasuhiro Kuroda ,&nbsp;Kazuhiro Sugiyama ,&nbsp;on behalf of the SAVE-J II Study Group","doi":"10.1016/j.ajem.2025.03.041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is a resource-intensive treatment for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), underscoring the importance of identifying patients with favorable neurological outcomes. We investigated whether waveform changes from initial shockable cardiac rhythm to alternative cardiac rhythm upon hospital arrival can predict the outcomes of patients undergoing ECPR for OHCA.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This secondary analysis of the SAVE-J II study included patients with OHCA who received ECPR at 36 emergency departments in Japan. We identified patients who experienced OHCA with shockable cardiac rhythm at the scene and subsequently underwent ECPR. We performed multivariable logistic regression analysis to assess the association between the waveform at hospital arrival and outcomes. The primary outcome was a favorable neurological outcome (cerebral performance category 1 or 2) at 1 month after arrest.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, 1114 patients were eligible for analysis. The rate of achieving a favorable neurological outcome was highest in patients who had sustained shockable cardiac rhythm on hospital arrival, followed by those with pulseless electrical activity and asystole (22.4 % vs. 9.5 % vs. 2.7 %, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). The difference remained significant after adjusting for confounding factors, with adjusted odds ratio (95 % CI) of 0.35 (0.21–0.58) and 0.08 (0.03–0.20) for pulseless electrical activity and asystole groups, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The waveform transition from shockable to alternate cardiac rhythm was associated with significantly poor outcomes after ECPR for OHCA. Patients with waveform conversion from VF/VT to asystole upon hospital arrival had exceedingly low probabilities of achieving favorable neurological outcomes, necessitating careful consideration of ECPR's appropriateness in this population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55536,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"93 ","pages":"Pages 103-108"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735675725002062","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is a resource-intensive treatment for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), underscoring the importance of identifying patients with favorable neurological outcomes. We investigated whether waveform changes from initial shockable cardiac rhythm to alternative cardiac rhythm upon hospital arrival can predict the outcomes of patients undergoing ECPR for OHCA.

Methods

This secondary analysis of the SAVE-J II study included patients with OHCA who received ECPR at 36 emergency departments in Japan. We identified patients who experienced OHCA with shockable cardiac rhythm at the scene and subsequently underwent ECPR. We performed multivariable logistic regression analysis to assess the association between the waveform at hospital arrival and outcomes. The primary outcome was a favorable neurological outcome (cerebral performance category 1 or 2) at 1 month after arrest.

Results

Overall, 1114 patients were eligible for analysis. The rate of achieving a favorable neurological outcome was highest in patients who had sustained shockable cardiac rhythm on hospital arrival, followed by those with pulseless electrical activity and asystole (22.4 % vs. 9.5 % vs. 2.7 %, P < 0.001). The difference remained significant after adjusting for confounding factors, with adjusted odds ratio (95 % CI) of 0.35 (0.21–0.58) and 0.08 (0.03–0.20) for pulseless electrical activity and asystole groups, respectively.

Conclusions

The waveform transition from shockable to alternate cardiac rhythm was associated with significantly poor outcomes after ECPR for OHCA. Patients with waveform conversion from VF/VT to asystole upon hospital arrival had exceedingly low probabilities of achieving favorable neurological outcomes, necessitating careful consideration of ECPR's appropriateness in this population.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
730
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: A distinctive blend of practicality and scholarliness makes the American Journal of Emergency Medicine a key source for information on emergency medical care. Covering all activities concerned with emergency medicine, it is the journal to turn to for information to help increase the ability to understand, recognize and treat emergency conditions. Issues contain clinical articles, case reports, review articles, editorials, international notes, book reviews and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信