Workplace incivility: A comparison of nursing faculty and administrator perspectives

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Wendy Moore PhD, RN-C, CNE
{"title":"Workplace incivility: A comparison of nursing faculty and administrator perspectives","authors":"Wendy Moore PhD, RN-C, CNE","doi":"10.1016/j.profnurs.2025.03.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Workplace incivility is an ongoing concern in nursing education. Faculty and administrators who experience incivility are more likely to leave nursing education, contributing to the already significant nursing faculty shortage. While faculty rely on administrators to address incivility, administrators often feel unprepared and unsupported in their attempts to address incivility.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to compare experiences of workplace incivility between nursing faculty and academic administrators.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The Workplace Incivility/Civility Survey (WICS) was used to collect data for this study. Descriptive statistics were calculated to compare the experience of workplace incivility between faculty and administrators. Content analysis was used to determine themes in the narrative data.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The perception of workplace incivility was similar between faculty and administrators. Academic administrators reported witnessing or experiencing workplace incivility more frequently than faculty.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Both faculty and academic administrators need support to effectively address workplace incivility and create a culture of civility and respect.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Professional Nursing","volume":"58 ","pages":"Pages 112-118"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Professional Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S8755722325000444","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Workplace incivility is an ongoing concern in nursing education. Faculty and administrators who experience incivility are more likely to leave nursing education, contributing to the already significant nursing faculty shortage. While faculty rely on administrators to address incivility, administrators often feel unprepared and unsupported in their attempts to address incivility.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to compare experiences of workplace incivility between nursing faculty and academic administrators.

Methods

The Workplace Incivility/Civility Survey (WICS) was used to collect data for this study. Descriptive statistics were calculated to compare the experience of workplace incivility between faculty and administrators. Content analysis was used to determine themes in the narrative data.

Results

The perception of workplace incivility was similar between faculty and administrators. Academic administrators reported witnessing or experiencing workplace incivility more frequently than faculty.

Conclusion

Both faculty and academic administrators need support to effectively address workplace incivility and create a culture of civility and respect.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.00%
发文量
153
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The Journal will accept articles that focus on baccalaureate and higher degree nursing education, educational research, policy related to education, and education and practice partnerships. Reports of original work, research, reviews, insightful descriptions, and policy papers focusing on baccalaureate and graduate nursing education will be published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信