EFL university students’ game element preferences and learning needs: Implications for the instructional design of digital gamified classes

IF 4.9 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Yujia Hong , Nadira Saab , Wilfried Admiraal
{"title":"EFL university students’ game element preferences and learning needs: Implications for the instructional design of digital gamified classes","authors":"Yujia Hong ,&nbsp;Nadira Saab ,&nbsp;Wilfried Admiraal","doi":"10.1016/j.system.2025.103670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Digital gamification has a great potential for enhancing EFL learners' motivation and achievement. A digital gamified class should be the integration of ‘game’ and ‘learning’ aspects. However, most studies on it have been conducted only with the hypothesis of using game elements to improve the student experience, ignoring the role of students' learning needs in the success of digital gamification. The present study employed the Target Needs Analysis Model and used five commonly used game elements in class to investigate university EFL students' learning needs, game element preferences, and the relationship between them, with English writing homework as the application context. Online survey data from 505 EFL learners who have experienced English writing homework in Chinese universities were collected. Through descriptive analysis, their preferred game elements for designing English writing homework were found (competition the most while ranking the least). Five types of learning needs were identified as well, ranging from text types to writing tasks. In addition, the results of the content analysis showed that a small percentage of participants were reluctant to use digital gamification due to unfamiliarity (about 9.4 %) and demotivation (about 3.6 %). Three design principles for gamified English writing were also yielded, that is, instant and personalized feedback, appropriate time pressure, and difficulty levels. Moreover, path analysis and Structural Equation Modeling approaches demonstrated that there was no significant correlation between specific types of game elements and writing needs, although different gamification designs could slightly facilitate the fulfillment of learning needs. Furthermore, we gave both practical implications and recommendations for future research on digital gamification for learning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48185,"journal":{"name":"System","volume":"131 ","pages":"Article 103670"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"System","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0346251X25000806","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Digital gamification has a great potential for enhancing EFL learners' motivation and achievement. A digital gamified class should be the integration of ‘game’ and ‘learning’ aspects. However, most studies on it have been conducted only with the hypothesis of using game elements to improve the student experience, ignoring the role of students' learning needs in the success of digital gamification. The present study employed the Target Needs Analysis Model and used five commonly used game elements in class to investigate university EFL students' learning needs, game element preferences, and the relationship between them, with English writing homework as the application context. Online survey data from 505 EFL learners who have experienced English writing homework in Chinese universities were collected. Through descriptive analysis, their preferred game elements for designing English writing homework were found (competition the most while ranking the least). Five types of learning needs were identified as well, ranging from text types to writing tasks. In addition, the results of the content analysis showed that a small percentage of participants were reluctant to use digital gamification due to unfamiliarity (about 9.4 %) and demotivation (about 3.6 %). Three design principles for gamified English writing were also yielded, that is, instant and personalized feedback, appropriate time pressure, and difficulty levels. Moreover, path analysis and Structural Equation Modeling approaches demonstrated that there was no significant correlation between specific types of game elements and writing needs, although different gamification designs could slightly facilitate the fulfillment of learning needs. Furthermore, we gave both practical implications and recommendations for future research on digital gamification for learning.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
System
System Multiple-
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
202
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: This international journal is devoted to the applications of educational technology and applied linguistics to problems of foreign language teaching and learning. Attention is paid to all languages and to problems associated with the study and teaching of English as a second or foreign language. The journal serves as a vehicle of expression for colleagues in developing countries. System prefers its contributors to provide articles which have a sound theoretical base with a visible practical application which can be generalized. The review section may take up works of a more theoretical nature to broaden the background.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信