Does user interest matter? Exploring the impact of ignoring user interests in recommendations

IF 7.5 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Lijia Chen , Chang Sun , Yan-Li Lee , Qingsong Pu , Xinru Chen , Jia Liu , Yajun Du , Wen-Bo Xie
{"title":"Does user interest matter? Exploring the impact of ignoring user interests in recommendations","authors":"Lijia Chen ,&nbsp;Chang Sun ,&nbsp;Yan-Li Lee ,&nbsp;Qingsong Pu ,&nbsp;Xinru Chen ,&nbsp;Jia Liu ,&nbsp;Yajun Du ,&nbsp;Wen-Bo Xie","doi":"10.1016/j.eswa.2025.127373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>User interests have long been a critical factor in recommender systems, serving as a key criterion for recommendations. Existing interest-based recommendation prioritize matching items to users’ interests, often overlooking the importance of the intrinsic characteristics of items. This can lead to recommendations that, while aligned with user interests, fail to address the user’s specific preferences for item intrinsic characteristics, reducing satisfaction and trust in the system. In this paper, we propose an interest disentangling recommendation algorithm (IDG). During the model-training phase, user interactions with items are disentangled into user preference for items’ intrinsic characteristics and interest groups associated with those items. During the prediction phase, downplay the user’s preferences for items’ interest groups and focus more on their preferences for the items’ intrinsic characteristics. Extensive experiments show that, on average, IDG outperforms the ten baselines by 15.9%, 34.2%, 25% and 32.8% in terms of HR@20, NDCG@20, PRE@20, and ILS@20, respectively, across three real datasets. Further experiments show that items recommended by the IDG algorithm are more concentrated within the same interest groups. However, IDG effectively enhances the diversity of items within the recommendation list, quantified by item similarity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50461,"journal":{"name":"Expert Systems with Applications","volume":"279 ","pages":"Article 127373"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Systems with Applications","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957417425009959","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

User interests have long been a critical factor in recommender systems, serving as a key criterion for recommendations. Existing interest-based recommendation prioritize matching items to users’ interests, often overlooking the importance of the intrinsic characteristics of items. This can lead to recommendations that, while aligned with user interests, fail to address the user’s specific preferences for item intrinsic characteristics, reducing satisfaction and trust in the system. In this paper, we propose an interest disentangling recommendation algorithm (IDG). During the model-training phase, user interactions with items are disentangled into user preference for items’ intrinsic characteristics and interest groups associated with those items. During the prediction phase, downplay the user’s preferences for items’ interest groups and focus more on their preferences for the items’ intrinsic characteristics. Extensive experiments show that, on average, IDG outperforms the ten baselines by 15.9%, 34.2%, 25% and 32.8% in terms of HR@20, NDCG@20, PRE@20, and ILS@20, respectively, across three real datasets. Further experiments show that items recommended by the IDG algorithm are more concentrated within the same interest groups. However, IDG effectively enhances the diversity of items within the recommendation list, quantified by item similarity.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Expert Systems with Applications
Expert Systems with Applications 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
10.60%
发文量
2045
审稿时长
8.7 months
期刊介绍: Expert Systems With Applications is an international journal dedicated to the exchange of information on expert and intelligent systems used globally in industry, government, and universities. The journal emphasizes original papers covering the design, development, testing, implementation, and management of these systems, offering practical guidelines. It spans various sectors such as finance, engineering, marketing, law, project management, information management, medicine, and more. The journal also welcomes papers on multi-agent systems, knowledge management, neural networks, knowledge discovery, data mining, and other related areas, excluding applications to military/defense systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信