Integrating multi-source remote sensing data and machine learning for predicting tree density and cover in Argania spinosa

IF 6.3 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING
Mohamed Mouafik , Fouad Mounir , Ahmed El Aboudi
{"title":"Integrating multi-source remote sensing data and machine learning for predicting tree density and cover in Argania spinosa","authors":"Mohamed Mouafik ,&nbsp;Fouad Mounir ,&nbsp;Ahmed El Aboudi","doi":"10.1016/j.atech.2025.100911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This examination explores the application of remote sensing technologies, including Sеntinеl-2, Mohammed VI satellite imagery and Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), to predict the cover and density of Argane forest stands in Morocco. The primary objective was to determine the most dependable dataset for estimating these parameters by assessing the performance of various machine learning models. We integrated multiple vegetation indices and compared algorithms such as XGBoost, LightGBM, GBDT, RF and ANN. XGBoost and LightGBM outperformed the other models in estimating tree density using UAV and Mohammed VI data, with XGBoost achieving an impressive R² of 0.99 and RMSE values of 0.05 and 2.85, respectively, demonstrating strong alignment between predicted and measured parameters. Sеntinеl-2 data was particularly effective in predicting vegetation cover for both algorithms, exhibiting an impressive R² of 0.99 and RMSE of 0.34, highlighting a strong correlation. XGBoost and LightGBM consistently delivered the best results for estimating Argane stands density and cover, followed by GBDT, RF, and ANN. Correlation analysis revealed strong positive relationships between vegetation indices (NDVI and SeLI) and Argane stands density and cover across all data sources. The research revealed substantial variability in tree density and cover across different studied regions, with XGBoost model results indicating that the highest density (76.01 trees/ha) was recorded in Essaouira, while the lowest density (43.03 trees/ha) was found in Tiznit/Aït Baha. These findings underscore the importance of selecting appropriate data sources and algorithms for precise ecological assessments and provide valuable insights into the dynamics and ecological status of Argane forest stands, supporting effective forest management and conservation strategies in the context of climate change and environmental degradation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74813,"journal":{"name":"Smart agricultural technology","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100911"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Smart agricultural technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772375525001443","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This examination explores the application of remote sensing technologies, including Sеntinеl-2, Mohammed VI satellite imagery and Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), to predict the cover and density of Argane forest stands in Morocco. The primary objective was to determine the most dependable dataset for estimating these parameters by assessing the performance of various machine learning models. We integrated multiple vegetation indices and compared algorithms such as XGBoost, LightGBM, GBDT, RF and ANN. XGBoost and LightGBM outperformed the other models in estimating tree density using UAV and Mohammed VI data, with XGBoost achieving an impressive R² of 0.99 and RMSE values of 0.05 and 2.85, respectively, demonstrating strong alignment between predicted and measured parameters. Sеntinеl-2 data was particularly effective in predicting vegetation cover for both algorithms, exhibiting an impressive R² of 0.99 and RMSE of 0.34, highlighting a strong correlation. XGBoost and LightGBM consistently delivered the best results for estimating Argane stands density and cover, followed by GBDT, RF, and ANN. Correlation analysis revealed strong positive relationships between vegetation indices (NDVI and SeLI) and Argane stands density and cover across all data sources. The research revealed substantial variability in tree density and cover across different studied regions, with XGBoost model results indicating that the highest density (76.01 trees/ha) was recorded in Essaouira, while the lowest density (43.03 trees/ha) was found in Tiznit/Aït Baha. These findings underscore the importance of selecting appropriate data sources and algorithms for precise ecological assessments and provide valuable insights into the dynamics and ecological status of Argane forest stands, supporting effective forest management and conservation strategies in the context of climate change and environmental degradation.
多源遥感数据与机器学习相结合的刺叶松树密度和覆盖度预测
本研究探讨了遥感技术的应用,包括snovell -2、穆罕默德六世卫星图像和无人机(uav),以预测摩洛哥阿gane林分的覆盖和密度。主要目标是通过评估各种机器学习模型的性能来确定最可靠的数据集来估计这些参数。我们整合了多种植被指数,并比较了XGBoost、LightGBM、GBDT、RF和ANN等算法。XGBoost和LightGBM在使用无人机和穆罕默德六世数据估计树木密度方面优于其他模型,其中XGBoost的R²分别达到0.99,RMSE值分别为0.05和2.85,表明预测参数和测量参数之间具有很强的一致性。对于这两种算法,snovell -2数据在预测植被覆盖方面特别有效,显示出令人印象深刻的R²0.99和RMSE 0.34,突出了很强的相关性。XGBoost和LightGBM在估算氩气林分密度和覆盖度方面的结果始终是最好的,其次是GBDT、RF和ANN。相关分析表明,植被指数(NDVI和SeLI)与阔叶树林分密度和盖度呈显著正相关。研究发现,不同研究区域的树木密度和覆盖度存在显著差异,XGBoost模型结果显示,Essaouira的密度最高(76.01棵/ha),而Tiznit/Aït Baha的密度最低(43.03棵/ha)。这些发现强调了选择适当的数据来源和算法进行精确生态评估的重要性,并提供了对阿根尼林分动态和生态状况的宝贵见解,支持在气候变化和环境退化背景下有效的森林管理和保护战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信