A decision transformer approach to grain boundary network optimization

IF 3.1 3区 材料科学 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Christopher W. Adair, Oliver K. Johnson
{"title":"A decision transformer approach to grain boundary network optimization","authors":"Christopher W. Adair,&nbsp;Oliver K. Johnson","doi":"10.1016/j.commatsci.2025.113852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As microstructure property models improve, additional information from crystallographic degrees of freedom and grain boundary networks (GBNs) can be included in microstructure design problems. However, the high-dimensional nature of including this information precludes the use of many common optimization approaches and requires less efficient methods to generate quality designs. Previous work demonstrated that human-in-the-loop optimization, instantiated as a video game, achieved high-quality, efficient solutions to these design problems. However, such data is expensive to obtain. In the present work, we show how a Decision Transformer machine learning (ML) model can be used to learn from the optimization trajectories generated by human players, and subsequently solve materials design problems. We compare the ML optimization trajectories against players and a common global optimization algorithm: simulated annealing (SA). We find that the ML model exhibits a validation accuracy of 84% against player decisions, and achieves solutions of comparable quality to SA (92%), but does so using three orders of magnitude fewer iterations. We find that the ML model generalizes in important and surprising ways, including the ability to train using a simple constitutive structure–property model and then solve microstructure design problems for a different, higher-fidelity, constitutive structure–property model without any retraining. These results demonstrate the potential of Decision Transformer models for the solution of materials design problems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10650,"journal":{"name":"Computational Materials Science","volume":"253 ","pages":"Article 113852"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational Materials Science","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927025625001958","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As microstructure property models improve, additional information from crystallographic degrees of freedom and grain boundary networks (GBNs) can be included in microstructure design problems. However, the high-dimensional nature of including this information precludes the use of many common optimization approaches and requires less efficient methods to generate quality designs. Previous work demonstrated that human-in-the-loop optimization, instantiated as a video game, achieved high-quality, efficient solutions to these design problems. However, such data is expensive to obtain. In the present work, we show how a Decision Transformer machine learning (ML) model can be used to learn from the optimization trajectories generated by human players, and subsequently solve materials design problems. We compare the ML optimization trajectories against players and a common global optimization algorithm: simulated annealing (SA). We find that the ML model exhibits a validation accuracy of 84% against player decisions, and achieves solutions of comparable quality to SA (92%), but does so using three orders of magnitude fewer iterations. We find that the ML model generalizes in important and surprising ways, including the ability to train using a simple constitutive structure–property model and then solve microstructure design problems for a different, higher-fidelity, constitutive structure–property model without any retraining. These results demonstrate the potential of Decision Transformer models for the solution of materials design problems.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computational Materials Science
Computational Materials Science 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
6.10%
发文量
665
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The goal of Computational Materials Science is to report on results that provide new or unique insights into, or significantly expand our understanding of, the properties of materials or phenomena associated with their design, synthesis, processing, characterization, and utilization. To be relevant to the journal, the results should be applied or applicable to specific material systems that are discussed within the submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信