Genomic profiling of aggressive pathologic features in lung adenocarcinoma

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Yi-Duo Lin , Hong-Ji Li , Hui-Zhao Hong , Yi-Fan Qi , Yun-Yi Li , Xue-Ning Yang , Yi-Long Wu , Wen-Zhao Zhong
{"title":"Genomic profiling of aggressive pathologic features in lung adenocarcinoma","authors":"Yi-Duo Lin ,&nbsp;Hong-Ji Li ,&nbsp;Hui-Zhao Hong ,&nbsp;Yi-Fan Qi ,&nbsp;Yun-Yi Li ,&nbsp;Xue-Ning Yang ,&nbsp;Yi-Long Wu ,&nbsp;Wen-Zhao Zhong","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Pathologic features involving LVI (lympho-vascular invasion), PNI (perineural invasion), STAS (spread through air spaces), and Grade 3 pattern (from the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer grading system) are related to having an aggressive phenotype and linked to poor prognosis. However, few studies have conducted in-depth analyses of these features simultaneously with genomic profiling.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 1559 sequencing of adenocarcinoma samples were included in the common driver mutations analysis, 1306 samples were brought into genomic mapping analysis. OncoSG’s East Asian ancestry dataset was implemented for Tumor-Node-Metastasis-Biomarker (TNMB) classification and prognostic assessment.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>EGFR was more significantly prevalent in LVI negativity (P = 0.021), STAS negativity (P = 0.002), and moderate grade (P &lt; 0.001). ALK was significantly interrelated with LVI (P = 0.028), STAS (P &lt; 0.001), and poor grade (P &lt; 0.001); ROS1 and STAS positivity (P = 0.031), poor grade (P = 0.016) were significantly related. KRAS (P = 0.003) and BRAF-V600E (P = 0.002) were only significantly intertwined with poor grade. Apart from common driver mutations, TP53, CHEK2, KEAP1, PTEN, RB1, NF1 were significantly enriched in LVI samples (P &lt; 0.05). TP53, PTEN, CTNNB1, HGF, NF1 were more prominent in STAS (P &lt; 0.01). TP53, LRP1B, NF1 were significantly more prevalent in Grade 3 pattern (P &lt; 0.001). The mixture of STK11, PTEN, and TOP2A generated by exclusive mutations may be a potential predictor of TNMB categorization towards survival. The HR of stage II compared I of TNMB was 2.28 (95 % CI 1.36–3.86, P &lt; 0.001), while stage III compared II was 1.95 (95 % CI 1.04–3.21, P = 0.031).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This analysis demonstrated the correlation of pathologic features with common driver mutations, key mutations and canonical oncogenic signaling pathways. The data highlighted the similarities and differences among these features horizontally, and provide new insights in TNMB classification and prognostic assessment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":"203 ","pages":"Article 108460"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lung Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169500225003526","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Pathologic features involving LVI (lympho-vascular invasion), PNI (perineural invasion), STAS (spread through air spaces), and Grade 3 pattern (from the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer grading system) are related to having an aggressive phenotype and linked to poor prognosis. However, few studies have conducted in-depth analyses of these features simultaneously with genomic profiling.

Methods

A total of 1559 sequencing of adenocarcinoma samples were included in the common driver mutations analysis, 1306 samples were brought into genomic mapping analysis. OncoSG’s East Asian ancestry dataset was implemented for Tumor-Node-Metastasis-Biomarker (TNMB) classification and prognostic assessment.

Results

EGFR was more significantly prevalent in LVI negativity (P = 0.021), STAS negativity (P = 0.002), and moderate grade (P < 0.001). ALK was significantly interrelated with LVI (P = 0.028), STAS (P < 0.001), and poor grade (P < 0.001); ROS1 and STAS positivity (P = 0.031), poor grade (P = 0.016) were significantly related. KRAS (P = 0.003) and BRAF-V600E (P = 0.002) were only significantly intertwined with poor grade. Apart from common driver mutations, TP53, CHEK2, KEAP1, PTEN, RB1, NF1 were significantly enriched in LVI samples (P < 0.05). TP53, PTEN, CTNNB1, HGF, NF1 were more prominent in STAS (P < 0.01). TP53, LRP1B, NF1 were significantly more prevalent in Grade 3 pattern (P < 0.001). The mixture of STK11, PTEN, and TOP2A generated by exclusive mutations may be a potential predictor of TNMB categorization towards survival. The HR of stage II compared I of TNMB was 2.28 (95 % CI 1.36–3.86, P < 0.001), while stage III compared II was 1.95 (95 % CI 1.04–3.21, P = 0.031).

Conclusions

This analysis demonstrated the correlation of pathologic features with common driver mutations, key mutations and canonical oncogenic signaling pathways. The data highlighted the similarities and differences among these features horizontally, and provide new insights in TNMB classification and prognostic assessment.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lung Cancer
Lung Cancer 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
407
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: Lung Cancer is an international publication covering the clinical, translational and basic science of malignancies of the lung and chest region.Original research articles, early reports, review articles, editorials and correspondence covering the prevention, epidemiology and etiology, basic biology, pathology, clinical assessment, surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, combined treatment modalities, other treatment modalities and outcomes of lung cancer are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信