A Review of How Different Views on Ethics Shape Perceptions of Morality and Responsibility within AI Transformation

IF 6.9 3区 管理学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Teresa Hammerschmidt, Alina Hafner, Katharina Stolz, Nina Passlack, Oliver Posegga, Karl-Heinz Gerholz
{"title":"A Review of How Different Views on Ethics Shape Perceptions of Morality and Responsibility within AI Transformation","authors":"Teresa Hammerschmidt, Alina Hafner, Katharina Stolz, Nina Passlack, Oliver Posegga, Karl-Heinz Gerholz","doi":"10.1007/s10796-025-10596-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper examines the evolving dynamics of human-AI interaction, emphasizing the ethical challenges and responsibility gaps that emerge as AI technologies become more autonomous and integrated into society and business. We analyze, utilizing a systematic literature review, how various ethical views influence our understanding of morality and responsibility in human-AI collaborations. Deontological ethics emerge as a dominant theme, with much of the literature centered on ethical principles shaped by powerful nations. The study highlights the need to integrate diverse ethical perspectives into AI research to address contradictions in ethical frameworks across various cultural contexts. While respecting cultural differences, achieving a common ground among these frameworks requires increased dialogue among AI researchers and practitioners. Our findings further underscore the importance of future research in developing a more cohesive understanding of how AI transformation challenges previous assumptions about AI’s role in moral agency and responsibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":13610,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems Frontiers","volume":"81 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Systems Frontiers","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-025-10596-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines the evolving dynamics of human-AI interaction, emphasizing the ethical challenges and responsibility gaps that emerge as AI technologies become more autonomous and integrated into society and business. We analyze, utilizing a systematic literature review, how various ethical views influence our understanding of morality and responsibility in human-AI collaborations. Deontological ethics emerge as a dominant theme, with much of the literature centered on ethical principles shaped by powerful nations. The study highlights the need to integrate diverse ethical perspectives into AI research to address contradictions in ethical frameworks across various cultural contexts. While respecting cultural differences, achieving a common ground among these frameworks requires increased dialogue among AI researchers and practitioners. Our findings further underscore the importance of future research in developing a more cohesive understanding of how AI transformation challenges previous assumptions about AI’s role in moral agency and responsibility.

不同的伦理学观点如何影响人工智能转型中的道德和责任观念
本文研究了人类与人工智能互动的不断演变的动态,强调了随着人工智能技术变得更加自主并融入社会和商业而出现的伦理挑战和责任差距。我们利用系统的文献综述来分析各种伦理观点如何影响我们对人类与人工智能合作中的道德和责任的理解。道义伦理学作为一个主导主题出现,许多文献都集中在强国形成的伦理原则上。该研究强调了将不同的伦理观点纳入人工智能研究的必要性,以解决不同文化背景下伦理框架中的矛盾。在尊重文化差异的同时,在这些框架之间实现共同点需要人工智能研究人员和从业者之间加强对话。我们的研究结果进一步强调了未来研究的重要性,即发展对人工智能转型如何挑战先前关于人工智能在道德代理和责任中的作用的假设的更有凝聚力的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Information Systems Frontiers
Information Systems Frontiers 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
18.60%
发文量
127
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The interdisciplinary interfaces of Information Systems (IS) are fast emerging as defining areas of research and development in IS. These developments are largely due to the transformation of Information Technology (IT) towards networked worlds and its effects on global communications and economies. While these developments are shaping the way information is used in all forms of human enterprise, they are also setting the tone and pace of information systems of the future. The major advances in IT such as client/server systems, the Internet and the desktop/multimedia computing revolution, for example, have led to numerous important vistas of research and development with considerable practical impact and academic significance. While the industry seeks to develop high performance IS/IT solutions to a variety of contemporary information support needs, academia looks to extend the reach of IS technology into new application domains. Information Systems Frontiers (ISF) aims to provide a common forum of dissemination of frontline industrial developments of substantial academic value and pioneering academic research of significant practical impact.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信