Structural and functional alteration of the gut microbiomes in ICU staff: a cross-sectional analysis

IF 8.8 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Bing Xie, Chenyang Dong, Xin Zhao, Lianlian Qu, Yongling Lv, Hong Liu, Jiaxin Xu, Zhizhong Yu, Hexiao Shen, You Shang, Xing Zhao, Jiancheng Zhang
{"title":"Structural and functional alteration of the gut microbiomes in ICU staff: a cross-sectional analysis","authors":"Bing Xie, Chenyang Dong, Xin Zhao, Lianlian Qu, Yongling Lv, Hong Liu, Jiaxin Xu, Zhizhong Yu, Hexiao Shen, You Shang, Xing Zhao, Jiancheng Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s13054-025-05379-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"16S rRNA sequencing has revealed structural alterations in the gut microbiomes of medical workers, particularly those working in intensive care unit (ICU). This study aims to further compare the taxonomic and functional characteristics of gut microbiomes between ICU staff and non-medical individuals using metagenomic sequencing. A prospective cross-sectional cohort study was conducted, fecal samples from 39 individuals in each group—ICU staff and non-medical subjects were analyzed using metagenomic sequencing. PERMANOVA (using the adonis function) was employed to analyze the genus-level profiles and assess the impact of individual parameters on the gut microbiome. Multiple databases were utilized to annotate and compare the functional differences in gut microbiomes between the two groups. We observed that ICU staff exhibited a significant decrease in gut microbiome diversity, characterized by a marked decline in Actinobacteria and a substantial increase in Bacteroides and Bacteroidaceae. CAZy annotation revealed a notable increase in carbohydrate-active enzymes within the ICU staff cohort. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis further indicated an elevated risk of endocrine and metabolic disorders, along with enhanced glycan biosynthesis and metabolism. Additionally, KEGG pathway enrichment analysis highlighted significant enrichment in cancer-related pathways. Analysis using the Virulence Factor Database (VFDB) showed a higher abundance of virulence factors associated with immune modulation, invasion, and antimicrobial activity/competitive advantage among ICU staff. Notably, no discernible difference in the presence of antibiotic resistance genes within the gut microbiomes was observed between the two groups. Importantly, all aforementioned differences demonstrated clear gender disparities. Our findings indicated that ICU staff exhibited a reduction in gut microbiome diversity which was associated with an increase in virulence factors and carbohydrate-active enzymes, as well as with a heightened susceptibility to endocrine and metabolic diseases and cancers.","PeriodicalId":10811,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care","volume":"96 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-025-05379-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

16S rRNA sequencing has revealed structural alterations in the gut microbiomes of medical workers, particularly those working in intensive care unit (ICU). This study aims to further compare the taxonomic and functional characteristics of gut microbiomes between ICU staff and non-medical individuals using metagenomic sequencing. A prospective cross-sectional cohort study was conducted, fecal samples from 39 individuals in each group—ICU staff and non-medical subjects were analyzed using metagenomic sequencing. PERMANOVA (using the adonis function) was employed to analyze the genus-level profiles and assess the impact of individual parameters on the gut microbiome. Multiple databases were utilized to annotate and compare the functional differences in gut microbiomes between the two groups. We observed that ICU staff exhibited a significant decrease in gut microbiome diversity, characterized by a marked decline in Actinobacteria and a substantial increase in Bacteroides and Bacteroidaceae. CAZy annotation revealed a notable increase in carbohydrate-active enzymes within the ICU staff cohort. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis further indicated an elevated risk of endocrine and metabolic disorders, along with enhanced glycan biosynthesis and metabolism. Additionally, KEGG pathway enrichment analysis highlighted significant enrichment in cancer-related pathways. Analysis using the Virulence Factor Database (VFDB) showed a higher abundance of virulence factors associated with immune modulation, invasion, and antimicrobial activity/competitive advantage among ICU staff. Notably, no discernible difference in the presence of antibiotic resistance genes within the gut microbiomes was observed between the two groups. Importantly, all aforementioned differences demonstrated clear gender disparities. Our findings indicated that ICU staff exhibited a reduction in gut microbiome diversity which was associated with an increase in virulence factors and carbohydrate-active enzymes, as well as with a heightened susceptibility to endocrine and metabolic diseases and cancers.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical Care
Critical Care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
20.60
自引率
3.30%
发文量
348
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care is an esteemed international medical journal that undergoes a rigorous peer-review process to maintain its high quality standards. Its primary objective is to enhance the healthcare services offered to critically ill patients. To achieve this, the journal focuses on gathering, exchanging, disseminating, and endorsing evidence-based information that is highly relevant to intensivists. By doing so, Critical Care seeks to provide a thorough and inclusive examination of the intensive care field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信