Practice Standards for Acute Hospital Care at Home.

David M Levine, Linda V DeCherrie, Albert Siu, Gabrielle Schiller, Chrisanne Timpe, Stephanie Murphy, Margaret Paulson, Christine Lum Lung, Michael Nottidge, Karen Titchener, Bruce Leff
{"title":"Practice Standards for Acute Hospital Care at Home.","authors":"David M Levine, Linda V DeCherrie, Albert Siu, Gabrielle Schiller, Chrisanne Timpe, Stephanie Murphy, Margaret Paulson, Christine Lum Lung, Michael Nottidge, Karen Titchener, Bruce Leff","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hospital at home (HaH) provides hospital-level care at home as a substitute for brick-and-mortar hospital care. Multiple HaH studies demonstrate HaH provides safe, high-quality, cost-effective care. However, practices have varied approaches to delivering care and no HaH-specific national standards exist. We aimed to develop national practice standards for HaH and assess practice performance against the standards.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The HaH Users Group (HaHUG), the national convener of HaH practices, assembled the Practice Standards Council in 2019 to develop evidence-based standards for HaH. We reviewed existing international standards and the requirements of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Acute Hospital Care at Home Waiver. We engaged in multiple iterative rounds to develop domains and standards within each domain and then held an open comment period. We distributed an online survey for all HaHUG practices to self-assess whether they did not meet (score, -1), met (score, 0), or exceeded (score, +1) each standard. The American Hospital Association's Annual Survey was used to describe practices that did and did not complete the practice standards survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Final practice standards included 31 standards in 7 domains: leadership; education and training; human resources management; quality and quality improvement; safe practice and environment; and clinical standards and protocols. The majority of HaH practices self-rated that they met or exceeded standards: scores ranged from -5 to 31; mean score of 9.75 (SD, 12.60). Forty-nine of 213 eligible HaH practices completed the survey (response rate, 23.0%). Most hospitals were large (65% > 299 beds), nonprofit (85%), teaching (90%) centers that cared for a large proportion of patients with Medicaid.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We present the first national practice standards for HaH. The vast majority of HaH practices met or exceeded these standards by their own assessment. There was a range of performance across standards, demonstrating strengths and opportunities for ongoing development and quality improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19427","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hospital at home (HaH) provides hospital-level care at home as a substitute for brick-and-mortar hospital care. Multiple HaH studies demonstrate HaH provides safe, high-quality, cost-effective care. However, practices have varied approaches to delivering care and no HaH-specific national standards exist. We aimed to develop national practice standards for HaH and assess practice performance against the standards.

Methods: The HaH Users Group (HaHUG), the national convener of HaH practices, assembled the Practice Standards Council in 2019 to develop evidence-based standards for HaH. We reviewed existing international standards and the requirements of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Acute Hospital Care at Home Waiver. We engaged in multiple iterative rounds to develop domains and standards within each domain and then held an open comment period. We distributed an online survey for all HaHUG practices to self-assess whether they did not meet (score, -1), met (score, 0), or exceeded (score, +1) each standard. The American Hospital Association's Annual Survey was used to describe practices that did and did not complete the practice standards survey.

Results: Final practice standards included 31 standards in 7 domains: leadership; education and training; human resources management; quality and quality improvement; safe practice and environment; and clinical standards and protocols. The majority of HaH practices self-rated that they met or exceeded standards: scores ranged from -5 to 31; mean score of 9.75 (SD, 12.60). Forty-nine of 213 eligible HaH practices completed the survey (response rate, 23.0%). Most hospitals were large (65% > 299 beds), nonprofit (85%), teaching (90%) centers that cared for a large proportion of patients with Medicaid.

Conclusion: We present the first national practice standards for HaH. The vast majority of HaH practices met or exceeded these standards by their own assessment. There was a range of performance across standards, demonstrating strengths and opportunities for ongoing development and quality improvement.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信