Practice Standards for Acute Hospital Care at Home.

David M Levine, Linda V DeCherrie, Albert Siu, Gabrielle Schiller, Chrisanne Timpe, Stephanie Murphy, Margaret Paulson, Christine Lum Lung, Michael Nottidge, Karen Titchener, Bruce Leff
{"title":"Practice Standards for Acute Hospital Care at Home.","authors":"David M Levine, Linda V DeCherrie, Albert Siu, Gabrielle Schiller, Chrisanne Timpe, Stephanie Murphy, Margaret Paulson, Christine Lum Lung, Michael Nottidge, Karen Titchener, Bruce Leff","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hospital at home (HaH) provides hospital-level care at home as a substitute for brick-and-mortar hospital care. Multiple HaH studies demonstrate HaH provides safe, high-quality, cost-effective care. However, practices have varied approaches to delivering care and no HaH-specific national standards exist. We aimed to develop national practice standards for HaH and assess practice performance against the standards.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The HaH Users Group (HaHUG), the national convener of HaH practices, assembled the Practice Standards Council in 2019 to develop evidence-based standards for HaH. We reviewed existing international standards and the requirements of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Acute Hospital Care at Home Waiver. We engaged in multiple iterative rounds to develop domains and standards within each domain and then held an open comment period. We distributed an online survey for all HaHUG practices to self-assess whether they did not meet (score, -1), met (score, 0), or exceeded (score, +1) each standard. The American Hospital Association's Annual Survey was used to describe practices that did and did not complete the practice standards survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Final practice standards included 31 standards in 7 domains: leadership; education and training; human resources management; quality and quality improvement; safe practice and environment; and clinical standards and protocols. The majority of HaH practices self-rated that they met or exceeded standards: scores ranged from -5 to 31; mean score of 9.75 (SD, 12.60). Forty-nine of 213 eligible HaH practices completed the survey (response rate, 23.0%). Most hospitals were large (65% > 299 beds), nonprofit (85%), teaching (90%) centers that cared for a large proportion of patients with Medicaid.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We present the first national practice standards for HaH. The vast majority of HaH practices met or exceeded these standards by their own assessment. There was a range of performance across standards, demonstrating strengths and opportunities for ongoing development and quality improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19427","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hospital at home (HaH) provides hospital-level care at home as a substitute for brick-and-mortar hospital care. Multiple HaH studies demonstrate HaH provides safe, high-quality, cost-effective care. However, practices have varied approaches to delivering care and no HaH-specific national standards exist. We aimed to develop national practice standards for HaH and assess practice performance against the standards.

Methods: The HaH Users Group (HaHUG), the national convener of HaH practices, assembled the Practice Standards Council in 2019 to develop evidence-based standards for HaH. We reviewed existing international standards and the requirements of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Acute Hospital Care at Home Waiver. We engaged in multiple iterative rounds to develop domains and standards within each domain and then held an open comment period. We distributed an online survey for all HaHUG practices to self-assess whether they did not meet (score, -1), met (score, 0), or exceeded (score, +1) each standard. The American Hospital Association's Annual Survey was used to describe practices that did and did not complete the practice standards survey.

Results: Final practice standards included 31 standards in 7 domains: leadership; education and training; human resources management; quality and quality improvement; safe practice and environment; and clinical standards and protocols. The majority of HaH practices self-rated that they met or exceeded standards: scores ranged from -5 to 31; mean score of 9.75 (SD, 12.60). Forty-nine of 213 eligible HaH practices completed the survey (response rate, 23.0%). Most hospitals were large (65% > 299 beds), nonprofit (85%), teaching (90%) centers that cared for a large proportion of patients with Medicaid.

Conclusion: We present the first national practice standards for HaH. The vast majority of HaH practices met or exceeded these standards by their own assessment. There was a range of performance across standards, demonstrating strengths and opportunities for ongoing development and quality improvement.

居家急症医院护理实务标准。
背景:家庭医院(HaH)在家中提供医院级别的护理,以替代实体医院护理。多项HaH研究表明,HaH提供了安全、高质量、具有成本效益的护理。然而,实践有不同的方法来提供护理,没有特定的国家标准存在。我们的目标是制定国家卫生保健实践标准,并根据标准评估实践表现。方法:HaH用户组(HaHUG)是HaH实践的国家召集人,于2019年组建了实践标准委员会,以制定基于证据的HaH标准。我们审查了现有的国际标准以及医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心的居家急性病护理豁免要求。我们进行了多次迭代,在每个领域内开发领域和标准,然后举行了公开评论期。我们为所有HaHUG实践分发了一份在线调查,以自我评估它们是否不满足(得分,-1)、满足(得分,0)或超过(得分,+1)每个标准。美国医院协会的年度调查被用来描述完成和未完成实践标准调查的实践。结果:最终实施标准包括7个领域的31项标准:领导力;教育和培训;人力资源管理;质量及质量改进;安全操作与环境;以及临床标准和协议。大多数ha实践自评达到或超过标准:得分范围从-5到31;平均评分为9.75 (SD, 12.60)。在213个符合条件的HaH诊所中,有49个完成了调查(回复率为23.0%)。大多数医院都是大型医院(65%,拥有299张床位),非营利性医院(85%),教学中心(90%),照顾很大比例的医疗补助患者。结论:我们提出了第一个国家医疗卫生标准。根据他们自己的评估,绝大多数的卫生保健实践达到或超过了这些标准。有一系列跨标准的表现,展示了持续发展和质量改进的优势和机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信