Antibiotic prophylaxis and other factors influencing infection risk reduction in hand and forearm fracture surgery: a narrative review.

Andrzej Żyluk
{"title":"Antibiotic prophylaxis and other factors influencing infection risk reduction in hand and forearm fracture surgery: a narrative review.","authors":"Andrzej Żyluk","doi":"10.1016/j.hansur.2025.102152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Surgical site infection is a serious complication of fracture surgery that often requires antibiotic treatment, implant removal, and wound debridement. Antibiotic prophylaxis is one of the measures taken to reduce the risk of surgical site infection. Other factors influencing the risk of infection include leaving the ends of the K-wires protruding through the skin vs. buried under the skin, operating under full sterility vs. field sterility in the operating room, or the burden of comorbidities. The purpose of this study was to review the current literature on antibiotic prophylaxis and other factors that influence the risk of infection during surgery for hand and distal radial fractures. We also reviewed the literature on potential adverse effects and costs of antibiotic prophylaxis. Results. Three studies and one systematic review were identified for the operative treatment of closed hand and distal radius fractures, none of which supported the routine use of antibiotic prophylaxis. For leaving the ends of K-wires exposed versus burying them under the skin, two articles were found. One reported an increased risk of surgical site infection when K-wires are left exposed, and the other reported that it does not matter. Three studies reported harmful and adverse effects of unnecessary use of antibiotic prophylaxis. Two studies reported an increased risk of surgical site infection in patients with comorbidities, compromised immunity, smoking, and alcohol use. The routine use of antibiotic prophylaxis generates significant costs that can be avoided if it is used as recommended by evidence-based medicine. Conclusion. The authors believe that this review may have many beneficial effects for patients and the health care system, such as: preventing bacterial resistance, increasing the efficacy of antibiotics in true infections, reducing the risk of adverse reactions, and reducing health care costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":94023,"journal":{"name":"Hand surgery & rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"102152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hand surgery & rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hansur.2025.102152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Surgical site infection is a serious complication of fracture surgery that often requires antibiotic treatment, implant removal, and wound debridement. Antibiotic prophylaxis is one of the measures taken to reduce the risk of surgical site infection. Other factors influencing the risk of infection include leaving the ends of the K-wires protruding through the skin vs. buried under the skin, operating under full sterility vs. field sterility in the operating room, or the burden of comorbidities. The purpose of this study was to review the current literature on antibiotic prophylaxis and other factors that influence the risk of infection during surgery for hand and distal radial fractures. We also reviewed the literature on potential adverse effects and costs of antibiotic prophylaxis. Results. Three studies and one systematic review were identified for the operative treatment of closed hand and distal radius fractures, none of which supported the routine use of antibiotic prophylaxis. For leaving the ends of K-wires exposed versus burying them under the skin, two articles were found. One reported an increased risk of surgical site infection when K-wires are left exposed, and the other reported that it does not matter. Three studies reported harmful and adverse effects of unnecessary use of antibiotic prophylaxis. Two studies reported an increased risk of surgical site infection in patients with comorbidities, compromised immunity, smoking, and alcohol use. The routine use of antibiotic prophylaxis generates significant costs that can be avoided if it is used as recommended by evidence-based medicine. Conclusion. The authors believe that this review may have many beneficial effects for patients and the health care system, such as: preventing bacterial resistance, increasing the efficacy of antibiotics in true infections, reducing the risk of adverse reactions, and reducing health care costs.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信