Psychological interventions for reducing depressive symptoms in rheumatoid arthritis patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Lijuan Zhang, Weiyi Zhu, Shiguang Liu
{"title":"Psychological interventions for reducing depressive symptoms in rheumatoid arthritis patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.","authors":"Lijuan Zhang, Weiyi Zhu, Shiguang Liu","doi":"10.1080/13548506.2025.2482949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Depression has long been recognized as the most common mental disorders of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. This study aimed to compare and rank the efficacy of different psychological interventions for reducing depressive symptoms among RA patients. The PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang databases, and grey literature were searched between inception and 1 June 2023. Pairs of reviewers screened studies, abstracted aggregate-level data, and appraised risk of bias with the Cochrane risk of bias tool. The study was conducted using the STATA software version 14.0. A total of 23 randomized controlled trials, involving 1885 participants and 16 interventions were included in our analyses. In this network meta-analysis, two interventions were associated with a greater reduction in symptoms of depression compared with treatment as usual care group: mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) and combined psychological interventions (CP). Although most psychological interventions showed non-significant effects, the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values revealed that the best psychological intervention for depression was MBCT (99.9%), followed by CP (85.6%). MBCT may be the most recommended intervention against the depression among RA patients according to our network meta-analysis results. Considering the methodological limitations of the included studies, more high-quality and large-sample RCTs are needed to confirm this result in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":54535,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Health & Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology Health & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2025.2482949","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Depression has long been recognized as the most common mental disorders of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. This study aimed to compare and rank the efficacy of different psychological interventions for reducing depressive symptoms among RA patients. The PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang databases, and grey literature were searched between inception and 1 June 2023. Pairs of reviewers screened studies, abstracted aggregate-level data, and appraised risk of bias with the Cochrane risk of bias tool. The study was conducted using the STATA software version 14.0. A total of 23 randomized controlled trials, involving 1885 participants and 16 interventions were included in our analyses. In this network meta-analysis, two interventions were associated with a greater reduction in symptoms of depression compared with treatment as usual care group: mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) and combined psychological interventions (CP). Although most psychological interventions showed non-significant effects, the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values revealed that the best psychological intervention for depression was MBCT (99.9%), followed by CP (85.6%). MBCT may be the most recommended intervention against the depression among RA patients according to our network meta-analysis results. Considering the methodological limitations of the included studies, more high-quality and large-sample RCTs are needed to confirm this result in the future.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychology Health & Medicine
Psychology Health & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
200
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychology, Health & Medicine is a multidisciplinary journal highlighting human factors in health. The journal provides a peer reviewed forum to report on issues of psychology and health in practice. This key publication reaches an international audience, highlighting the variation and similarities within different settings and exploring multiple health and illness issues from theoretical, practical and management perspectives. It provides a critical forum to examine the wide range of applied health and illness issues and how they incorporate psychological knowledge, understanding, theory and intervention. The journal reflects the growing recognition of psychosocial issues as they affect health planning, medical care, disease reaction, intervention, quality of life, adjustment adaptation and management. For many years theoretical research was very distant from applied understanding. The emerging movement in health psychology, changes in medical care provision and training, and consumer awareness of health issues all contribute to a growing need for applied research. This journal focuses on practical applications of theory, research and experience and provides a bridge between academic knowledge, illness experience, wellbeing and health care practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信