Racial disparities in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: an analysis of 67,621 patients.

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Brian Q Truong, Linsen T Samuel, Haseeb E Goheer, Zachary T Lyon, Jonathan J Carmouche
{"title":"Racial disparities in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: an analysis of 67,621 patients.","authors":"Brian Q Truong, Linsen T Samuel, Haseeb E Goheer, Zachary T Lyon, Jonathan J Carmouche","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2025.03.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Racial disparities have been demonstrated in the analysis of perioperative outcomes in minority populations in the field of spine surgery when compared to nonminorities. However, there are limited studies investigating the role of racial disparities in cervical spine surgery in a recent, large patient sample.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We assessed race and ethnicity as an independent risk factor in outcome disparities following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) among Black or African American (AA), Asian or Pacific Islander (AP), Hispanic (HA), and Native American or Alaska Native (NA) patients compared to White or Caucasian (CA) patients.</p><p><strong>Study design/setting: </strong>A retrospective cohort, large multicenter database study.</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for ACDFs from 2011 to 2021 by Common Procedural Terminology codes (22551, 22552, 22585, and 22554). Patients were categorized into five cohorts based on race and ethnicity: Asian American or Pacific Islander, Black or African American, Hispanic, Native American or Alaskan Native, and White or Caucasian.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>The outcome measures for this study were surgical complications, perioperative, and postoperative outcomes within 30-days postoperative.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Baseline characteristics were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) for continuous variables or chi-squared test for categorical variables with Bonferroni correction. Controlling for racial demographic and comorbidity differences via model selection by Akaike information criterion by backward stepwise regression, race and ethnicity were isolated as possible independent risk factors for short-term patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>67621 patients (54679 CA, 7358 AA, 1429 AP, 399 NA, and 3756 HA) were included in this study. AA race was an independent risk factor for medical complications (OR: 1.330, 95% CI [1.137-1.549], p < .001), operative time (β: 12.162 minutes, 95% CI [10.565-13.758], p < .001), length of stay (β: 0.514 days, 95% CI [0.431-0.597], p < .001), postoperative discharge time (β: 0.439 days, 95% CI [0.388-0.491], p < 0.001), 30-day reoperation (OR: 1.379, 95% CI [1.142-1.654], p < .001), and a nonhome discharge destination (OR: 2.256, 95% CI [2.022-2.514], p < .001). AP race was an independent risk factor for operative time (β: 14.293 minutes, 95% CI [10.854-17.732], p < .001). HA ethnicity was an independent risk factor for a nonhome discharge destination (OR: 1.395, 95% CI [1.171-1.652], p < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to CA patients, AA, AP, HA, and NA ACDF patients experience greater comorbidity burden and/or unfavorable 30-day surgical outcomes. These findings support the need for the exploration of interdisciplinary care focused on addressing known causes of disparities in minority patients. Future studies should account for social determinants of health by race and ethnicity to identify additional factors that may contribute to higher rates of complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2025.03.024","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background context: Racial disparities have been demonstrated in the analysis of perioperative outcomes in minority populations in the field of spine surgery when compared to nonminorities. However, there are limited studies investigating the role of racial disparities in cervical spine surgery in a recent, large patient sample.

Purpose: We assessed race and ethnicity as an independent risk factor in outcome disparities following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) among Black or African American (AA), Asian or Pacific Islander (AP), Hispanic (HA), and Native American or Alaska Native (NA) patients compared to White or Caucasian (CA) patients.

Study design/setting: A retrospective cohort, large multicenter database study.

Patient sample: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for ACDFs from 2011 to 2021 by Common Procedural Terminology codes (22551, 22552, 22585, and 22554). Patients were categorized into five cohorts based on race and ethnicity: Asian American or Pacific Islander, Black or African American, Hispanic, Native American or Alaskan Native, and White or Caucasian.

Outcome measures: The outcome measures for this study were surgical complications, perioperative, and postoperative outcomes within 30-days postoperative.

Methods: Baseline characteristics were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) for continuous variables or chi-squared test for categorical variables with Bonferroni correction. Controlling for racial demographic and comorbidity differences via model selection by Akaike information criterion by backward stepwise regression, race and ethnicity were isolated as possible independent risk factors for short-term patient outcomes.

Results: 67621 patients (54679 CA, 7358 AA, 1429 AP, 399 NA, and 3756 HA) were included in this study. AA race was an independent risk factor for medical complications (OR: 1.330, 95% CI [1.137-1.549], p < .001), operative time (β: 12.162 minutes, 95% CI [10.565-13.758], p < .001), length of stay (β: 0.514 days, 95% CI [0.431-0.597], p < .001), postoperative discharge time (β: 0.439 days, 95% CI [0.388-0.491], p < 0.001), 30-day reoperation (OR: 1.379, 95% CI [1.142-1.654], p < .001), and a nonhome discharge destination (OR: 2.256, 95% CI [2.022-2.514], p < .001). AP race was an independent risk factor for operative time (β: 14.293 minutes, 95% CI [10.854-17.732], p < .001). HA ethnicity was an independent risk factor for a nonhome discharge destination (OR: 1.395, 95% CI [1.171-1.652], p < .001).

Conclusions: Compared to CA patients, AA, AP, HA, and NA ACDF patients experience greater comorbidity burden and/or unfavorable 30-day surgical outcomes. These findings support the need for the exploration of interdisciplinary care focused on addressing known causes of disparities in minority patients. Future studies should account for social determinants of health by race and ethnicity to identify additional factors that may contribute to higher rates of complications.

67621例颈椎前路椎间盘切除术和融合患者的种族差异分析
背景背景:与非少数民族人群相比,在脊柱外科领域的少数民族人群围手术期结果分析中已经证明了种族差异。然而,在最近的大量患者样本中,调查种族差异在颈椎手术中的作用的研究有限。目的:我们评估了种族和民族作为黑人或非裔美国人(AA)、亚洲或太平洋岛民(AP)、西班牙裔(H)、美洲原住民或阿拉斯加原住民(NA)患者与白人或高加索(CA)患者在前路颈椎椎间盘切除术和融合(ACDF)后结果差异的独立危险因素。研究设计/设置:回顾性队列、大型多中心数据库研究。患者样本:通过通用程序术语代码(22551、22552、22585和22554)查询美国外科医师学会国家手术质量改进计划数据库2011-2021年的acdf。患者根据种族和民族分为五组:亚裔美国人或太平洋岛民、黑人或非裔美国人、西班牙裔(HA)、美洲原住民或阿拉斯加原住民、白人或高加索人。结局指标:本研究的结局指标为手术并发症、围手术期和术后30天内的结局。方法:连续变量采用方差分析(ANOVA),分类变量采用卡方检验,Bonferroni校正。通过反向逐步回归的赤池信息标准选择模型,控制种族人口统计学和合并症差异,分离出种族和民族作为患者短期结局可能的独立危险因素。结果:67,621例患者(54,679例CA, 7358例AA, 1429例AP, 399NA和3756例H)纳入本研究。AA种族是医疗并发症的独立危险因素(OR = 1.330,CI = 1.137-1.549,p)结论:与CA患者相比,AA、AP、HA和NA ACDF患者有更大的合病负担和/或不良的30天手术结果。这些发现支持探索跨学科护理的需要,重点是解决少数民族患者差异的已知原因。未来的研究应考虑种族和民族健康的社会决定因素,以确定可能导致并发症发生率较高的其他因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spine Journal
Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
680
审稿时长
13.1 weeks
期刊介绍: The Spine Journal, the official journal of the North American Spine Society, is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed articles on research and treatment related to the spine and spine care, including basic science and clinical investigations. It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to The Spine Journal have not been published, and will not be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. The Spine Journal also publishes major reviews of specific topics by acknowledged authorities, technical notes, teaching editorials, and other special features, Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信