Osteosarcoma of the mobile spine: A single-institution experience of 32 patients.

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jordan O Gasho, Vineet Desai, Santiago Lozano-Calderón, Gunnlaugur P Nielsen, Yin P Hung, Joseph H Schwab, Daniel G Tobert
{"title":"Osteosarcoma of the mobile spine: A single-institution experience of 32 patients.","authors":"Jordan O Gasho, Vineet Desai, Santiago Lozano-Calderón, Gunnlaugur P Nielsen, Yin P Hung, Joseph H Schwab, Daniel G Tobert","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2025.03.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Osteosarcoma of the mobile spine is a rare and complex condition, with limited case series informing treatment decisions. Recent advancements in treatment paradigms, particularly in en bloc resection and novel radiation techniques, may incite new treatment guidelines and improve patient outcomes. The clinical outcomes of patients treated for osteosarcoma of the mobile spine at our institution were reported over a decade ago, and this study provides an updated assessment of management strategies and patient outcomes since the initial publication.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To provide an updated analysis of clinical results for the treatment of mobile spine osteosarcoma.</p><p><strong>Study design/setting: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>Thirty-two patients treated at a single center for osteosarcoma of the spine over 22 years.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Estimation of overall patient survival, local recurrence, and the presence of metastatic disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Inclusion criteria were adult patients treated for osteosarcoma originating in the vertebral column with the exclusion of the sacrum at Massachusetts General Hospital between 2001 and 2023. The overall survival was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method, grouped by type of resection (en bloc versus intralesional) and histological subtype (osteoblastic, chondroblastic, other/unknown). Prognostic factors were assessed using Cox proportional hazards modeling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two of the 32 patients were given en bloc resection, while ten received piecemeal resection. We found higher overall survival with en bloc resection compared to intralesional resection (median survival 81.54 months versus 12.42 months, p=0.006) using Kaplan-Meier analysis techniques. However, in multivariable regression, neither en bloc resection nor histological subtype were predictive of better outcomes. Resection of greater than one level and younger age were associated with poor survival (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights the continued challenges for patients with spinal osteosarcoma despite advances in surgical techniques and radiation modalities. If feasible, en bloc resection yields improved overall survival compared to intralesional resection, but the five-year mortality rate remains high. Histological subtype did not significantly predict outcomes, while tumors involving multiple vertebral levels and younger age were associated with worse survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2025.03.017","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background context: Osteosarcoma of the mobile spine is a rare and complex condition, with limited case series informing treatment decisions. Recent advancements in treatment paradigms, particularly in en bloc resection and novel radiation techniques, may incite new treatment guidelines and improve patient outcomes. The clinical outcomes of patients treated for osteosarcoma of the mobile spine at our institution were reported over a decade ago, and this study provides an updated assessment of management strategies and patient outcomes since the initial publication.

Purpose: To provide an updated analysis of clinical results for the treatment of mobile spine osteosarcoma.

Study design/setting: Retrospective cohort study.

Patient sample: Thirty-two patients treated at a single center for osteosarcoma of the spine over 22 years.

Outcome measures: Estimation of overall patient survival, local recurrence, and the presence of metastatic disease.

Methods: Inclusion criteria were adult patients treated for osteosarcoma originating in the vertebral column with the exclusion of the sacrum at Massachusetts General Hospital between 2001 and 2023. The overall survival was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method, grouped by type of resection (en bloc versus intralesional) and histological subtype (osteoblastic, chondroblastic, other/unknown). Prognostic factors were assessed using Cox proportional hazards modeling.

Results: Twenty-two of the 32 patients were given en bloc resection, while ten received piecemeal resection. We found higher overall survival with en bloc resection compared to intralesional resection (median survival 81.54 months versus 12.42 months, p=0.006) using Kaplan-Meier analysis techniques. However, in multivariable regression, neither en bloc resection nor histological subtype were predictive of better outcomes. Resection of greater than one level and younger age were associated with poor survival (p<0.05).

Conclusions: This study highlights the continued challenges for patients with spinal osteosarcoma despite advances in surgical techniques and radiation modalities. If feasible, en bloc resection yields improved overall survival compared to intralesional resection, but the five-year mortality rate remains high. Histological subtype did not significantly predict outcomes, while tumors involving multiple vertebral levels and younger age were associated with worse survival.

背景情况:活动脊柱骨肉瘤是一种罕见而复杂的疾病,能为治疗决策提供参考的病例有限。最近在治疗范例方面取得的进展,尤其是整体切除术和新型放射技术,可能会催生新的治疗指南并改善患者的预后。我院十多年前曾报道过移动性脊柱骨肉瘤患者的临床疗效,本研究对首次发表以来的治疗策略和患者疗效进行了最新评估。研究目的:对治疗移动性脊柱骨肉瘤的临床疗效进行最新分析:回顾性队列研究:32名脊柱骨肉瘤患者在一个中心接受了22年的治疗:方法:纳入标准为接受过脊柱骨肉瘤治疗的成年患者:纳入标准:2001年至2023年间在马萨诸塞州总医院接受治疗的椎体骨肉瘤成年患者,骶骨除外。采用卡普兰-梅耶法评估总存活率,并按切除类型(整体切除还是局部切除)和组织学亚型(成骨细胞型、软骨细胞型、其他/未知)分组。采用Cox比例危险模型评估预后因素:32名患者中有22人接受了整体切除术,10人接受了局部切除术。通过卡普兰-梅耶尔分析技术,我们发现整体切除术的总生存期高于局部切除术(中位生存期81.54个月对12.42个月,P=0.006)。然而,在多变量回归中,整体切除和组织学亚型都不能预测更好的结果。切除范围超过一个层面和年龄较小与生存率较低有关(p结论:这项研究强调,尽管手术技术和放射模式不断进步,但脊柱骨肉瘤患者仍然面临挑战。在可行的情况下,整块切除比区域内切除能提高总生存率,但五年死亡率仍然很高。组织学亚型对预后的影响不大,而涉及多个椎体水平的肿瘤和年龄较小的患者生存率较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spine Journal
Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
680
审稿时长
13.1 weeks
期刊介绍: The Spine Journal, the official journal of the North American Spine Society, is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed articles on research and treatment related to the spine and spine care, including basic science and clinical investigations. It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to The Spine Journal have not been published, and will not be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. The Spine Journal also publishes major reviews of specific topics by acknowledged authorities, technical notes, teaching editorials, and other special features, Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信