The effect of a social network-based intervention to promote HIV testing and linkage to HIV services among fishermen in Kenya: a cluster-randomised trial.

IF 19.9 1区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Carol S Camlin, Lila A Sheira, Zachary A Kwena, Edwin D Charlebois, Kawango Agot, James Moody, Benard Ayieko, Sarah A Gutin, Antony Ochung, Phoebe Olugo, Jayne Lewis-Kulzer, Holly Nishimura, Monica Gandhi, Elizabeth A Bukusi, Harsha Thirumurthy
{"title":"The effect of a social network-based intervention to promote HIV testing and linkage to HIV services among fishermen in Kenya: a cluster-randomised trial.","authors":"Carol S Camlin, Lila A Sheira, Zachary A Kwena, Edwin D Charlebois, Kawango Agot, James Moody, Benard Ayieko, Sarah A Gutin, Antony Ochung, Phoebe Olugo, Jayne Lewis-Kulzer, Holly Nishimura, Monica Gandhi, Elizabeth A Bukusi, Harsha Thirumurthy","doi":"10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00539-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In sub-Saharan Africa, highly mobile men such as fishermen have a low uptake of HIV testing, prevention, and treatment. This study aimed to examine whether a HIV status-neutral, social network-based intervention could improve testing and linkage to prevention and treatment among fishermen in Kenya.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Owete cluster-randomised trial mapped the male social networks of fishermen in three communities along Lake Victoria in Siaya County, Kenya, and identified distinct social networks (clusters) with a highly connected, network-central man (promoter) in each network. Participant inclusion criteria were age 18 years or older, a listing in the Beach Management Unit registry, a governmental requirement to work as a fisherman at each site, and no participation in any other HIV-related study. Clusters were randomly assigned to an intervention group in which promoters were trained and offered multiple HIV self-tests to offer to cluster members, and transport vouchers (US$4) to encourage those members to link to HIV treatment or pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). In control clusters, promoters received HIV information and referral vouchers for a free self-test or provider-administered test in nearby clinics that they were encouraged to offer to cluster members. We compared self-reported HIV testing in the past 3 months and linkage to HIV services among participants in intervention and control clusters at the 3-month follow-up visit in the intention-to-treat sample, defined as members of the social networks who were successfully contacted at 3 months using a cluster-adjusted two-sample test of proportions. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04772469, and is completed.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between July 17, 2020 and Feb 2, 2022, 1509 eligible men participated in the beach census. 575 were excluded due to not being mapped to a close social network, and 934 men in 156 social network clusters were mapped. 453 men were randomly assigned to the intervention group and 481 were randomly assigned to the control group. 733 men completed a baseline survey (374 in the intervention group and 359 in the control group). 353 men in the intervention group and 313 in the control group completed the 3-month follow-up assessments and were included in the analysis of the primary outcome. Participants' median age was 35·5 years (IQR 30·1-42·3); 85% were married, with 22% in polygynous relationships. HIV testing via any modality at 3 months was higher in intervention compared with control clusters (65·6 [95% CI 59·5-71·7] vs 31·3% [25·4-37·2], p<0·0001). Self-reported HIV testing at 3 months was also higher in intervention clusters (60·4% [95% CI 54·2-66·7] vs 10·0% [6·8-13·3], p<0·0001). Additionally, following testing, linkage to HIV treatment or PrEP among those who tested was higher in intervention clusters (67·3% [95% CI 61·2-73·5] vs 15·6% [10·9-20·2], p<0·0001).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>A status-neutral social network intervention that utilised HIV self-screening tests proved to be highly effective in engaging hard-to-reach, highly mobile Kenyan men in HIV testing and care. This strategy holds promise for improving early detection and care engagement for other infectious and non-communicable diseases globally. Similar approaches that leverage peer influence within social networks and the growing accessibility of self-screening tests could be adapted for conditions such as tuberculosis, hepatitis, and hypertension in diverse global health settings.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>National Institute of Mental Health.</p>","PeriodicalId":48783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Global Health","volume":"13 4","pages":"e669-e678"},"PeriodicalIF":19.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00539-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In sub-Saharan Africa, highly mobile men such as fishermen have a low uptake of HIV testing, prevention, and treatment. This study aimed to examine whether a HIV status-neutral, social network-based intervention could improve testing and linkage to prevention and treatment among fishermen in Kenya.

Methods: The Owete cluster-randomised trial mapped the male social networks of fishermen in three communities along Lake Victoria in Siaya County, Kenya, and identified distinct social networks (clusters) with a highly connected, network-central man (promoter) in each network. Participant inclusion criteria were age 18 years or older, a listing in the Beach Management Unit registry, a governmental requirement to work as a fisherman at each site, and no participation in any other HIV-related study. Clusters were randomly assigned to an intervention group in which promoters were trained and offered multiple HIV self-tests to offer to cluster members, and transport vouchers (US$4) to encourage those members to link to HIV treatment or pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). In control clusters, promoters received HIV information and referral vouchers for a free self-test or provider-administered test in nearby clinics that they were encouraged to offer to cluster members. We compared self-reported HIV testing in the past 3 months and linkage to HIV services among participants in intervention and control clusters at the 3-month follow-up visit in the intention-to-treat sample, defined as members of the social networks who were successfully contacted at 3 months using a cluster-adjusted two-sample test of proportions. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04772469, and is completed.

Findings: Between July 17, 2020 and Feb 2, 2022, 1509 eligible men participated in the beach census. 575 were excluded due to not being mapped to a close social network, and 934 men in 156 social network clusters were mapped. 453 men were randomly assigned to the intervention group and 481 were randomly assigned to the control group. 733 men completed a baseline survey (374 in the intervention group and 359 in the control group). 353 men in the intervention group and 313 in the control group completed the 3-month follow-up assessments and were included in the analysis of the primary outcome. Participants' median age was 35·5 years (IQR 30·1-42·3); 85% were married, with 22% in polygynous relationships. HIV testing via any modality at 3 months was higher in intervention compared with control clusters (65·6 [95% CI 59·5-71·7] vs 31·3% [25·4-37·2], p<0·0001). Self-reported HIV testing at 3 months was also higher in intervention clusters (60·4% [95% CI 54·2-66·7] vs 10·0% [6·8-13·3], p<0·0001). Additionally, following testing, linkage to HIV treatment or PrEP among those who tested was higher in intervention clusters (67·3% [95% CI 61·2-73·5] vs 15·6% [10·9-20·2], p<0·0001).

Interpretation: A status-neutral social network intervention that utilised HIV self-screening tests proved to be highly effective in engaging hard-to-reach, highly mobile Kenyan men in HIV testing and care. This strategy holds promise for improving early detection and care engagement for other infectious and non-communicable diseases globally. Similar approaches that leverage peer influence within social networks and the growing accessibility of self-screening tests could be adapted for conditions such as tuberculosis, hepatitis, and hypertension in diverse global health settings.

Funding: National Institute of Mental Health.

背景:在撒哈拉以南非洲地区,渔民等流动性大的男性接受 HIV 检测、预防和治疗的比例较低。本研究旨在探讨一种不考虑艾滋病病毒感染状况、基于社会网络的干预措施能否改善肯尼亚渔民的检测和预防与治疗联系:Owete 群组随机试验绘制了肯尼亚西亚县维多利亚湖沿岸三个社区渔民的男性社会网络图,并确定了不同的社会网络(群组),每个网络中都有一个联系紧密的网络中心人(发起人)。参与者的纳入标准是:年龄在 18 岁或以上、在海滩管理单位登记簿上有列名、政府要求在每个地点从事渔民工作、未参与任何其他与 HIV 相关的研究。各群组被随机分配到干预组,在干预组中,宣传员将接受培训,并向群组成员提供多种 HIV 自我检测方法和交通券(4 美元),以鼓励这些成员接受 HIV 治疗或接触前预防疗法 (PrEP)。在对照群组中,推广者获得了 HIV 信息和转介券,可在附近的诊所进行免费的自我检测或由医疗服务提供者进行检测,并鼓励他们向群组成员提供这些服务。我们比较了干预群组和对照群组的参与者在过去 3 个月中自我报告的 HIV 检测情况以及在 3 个月随访中与 HIV 服务机构的联系情况,意向治疗样本的定义是在 3 个月中使用群组调整后的双样本比例检验法成功联系到的社会网络成员。该试验已在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT04772469,并已完成:2020年7月17日至2022年2月2日期间,1509名符合条件的男性参加了海滩普查。其中 575 人因没有映射到亲密的社交网络而被排除在外,156 个社交网络集群中的 934 名男性被映射到。453 名男性被随机分配到干预组,481 名男性被随机分配到对照组。733 名男性完成了基线调查(干预组 374 人,对照组 359 人)。干预组中的 353 名男性和对照组中的 313 名男性完成了 3 个月的跟踪评估,并被纳入主要结果的分析中。参与者的年龄中位数为 35-5 岁(IQR 30-1-42-3);85% 已婚,22% 为一夫多妻制。与对照组相比,干预组在 3 个月内通过任何方式进行 HIV 检测的比例更高(65-6 [95% CI 59-5-71-7] vs 31-3% [25-4-37-2],p解释:事实证明,利用 HIV 自我筛查测试的身份中立社会网络干预措施,对于让难以接触到的、流动性强的肯尼亚男性参与 HIV 检测和关怀非常有效。这一策略有望改善全球其他传染病和非传染性疾病的早期检测和护理工作。类似的方法可以利用社交网络中的同伴影响以及自我筛查测试的日益普及,适用于结核病、肝炎和高血压等疾病:国家精神卫生研究所。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lancet Global Health
Lancet Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
44.10
自引率
1.20%
发文量
763
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Global Health is an online publication that releases monthly open access (subscription-free) issues.Each issue includes original research, commentary, and correspondence.In addition to this, the publication also provides regular blog posts. The main focus of The Lancet Global Health is on disadvantaged populations, which can include both entire economic regions and marginalized groups within prosperous nations.The publication prefers to cover topics related to reproductive, maternal, neonatal, child, and adolescent health; infectious diseases (including neglected tropical diseases); non-communicable diseases; mental health; the global health workforce; health systems; surgery; and health policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信